Identifying facilitators, barriers and areas of opportunity in diabetic retinopathy screening: quality improvement through qualitative methods.

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Senxi Du, Matthew Freeby, Maria Han, Sylvia Lambrechts
{"title":"Identifying facilitators, barriers and areas of opportunity in diabetic retinopathy screening: quality improvement through qualitative methods.","authors":"Senxi Du, Matthew Freeby, Maria Han, Sylvia Lambrechts","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Quality improvement efforts have aimed to improve annual diabetic retinopathy screening at our institution, but rates remain well below goal. To better understand facilitators, barriers and operational issues unique to our health system and to develop a comprehensive understanding of the care pathway, the Patient Voice toolkit was applied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In-depth interviews were conducted individually with patients and care team members in a large urban academic medical centre with multiple satellite community clinics. Interviews with patients focused on facilitators and barriers to annual diabetic retinopathy screening. These interviews were transcribed and organised into discrete codes to identify initial themes. We interviewed clinic staff involved in diabetic retinopathy examination scheduling, execution or quality assurance. Interviews with care team members focused on training materials, camera operations and workflow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through analysis of 15 patient interviews, we found that facilitators included internal motivation, automated examination reminders, reminders from providers and utilisation of local optometry offices. Barriers included competing demands, distant retinal camera locations, limited appointment access and financial and insurance issues. Interviews with 13 care team members resulted in the creation of a process map, and areas of opportunity were identified in the training and operational workflows.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The inclusion of different stakeholder perspectives provides in-depth insight into facilitators and barriers to completing annual diabetic retinopathy screening, allowing for recommendations tailored to our specific health system and operations. Suggested operational improvements include expanding clinics that can perform this examination, increasing appointment flexibility, partnering with local optometry clinics and enhancing annual examination reminders to include more details about the examination. Recommendations suggested by staff include increasing patient education, setting expectations around the examination and implementing real-time feedback on image quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Quality improvement efforts have aimed to improve annual diabetic retinopathy screening at our institution, but rates remain well below goal. To better understand facilitators, barriers and operational issues unique to our health system and to develop a comprehensive understanding of the care pathway, the Patient Voice toolkit was applied.

Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted individually with patients and care team members in a large urban academic medical centre with multiple satellite community clinics. Interviews with patients focused on facilitators and barriers to annual diabetic retinopathy screening. These interviews were transcribed and organised into discrete codes to identify initial themes. We interviewed clinic staff involved in diabetic retinopathy examination scheduling, execution or quality assurance. Interviews with care team members focused on training materials, camera operations and workflow.

Results: Through analysis of 15 patient interviews, we found that facilitators included internal motivation, automated examination reminders, reminders from providers and utilisation of local optometry offices. Barriers included competing demands, distant retinal camera locations, limited appointment access and financial and insurance issues. Interviews with 13 care team members resulted in the creation of a process map, and areas of opportunity were identified in the training and operational workflows.

Conclusions: The inclusion of different stakeholder perspectives provides in-depth insight into facilitators and barriers to completing annual diabetic retinopathy screening, allowing for recommendations tailored to our specific health system and operations. Suggested operational improvements include expanding clinics that can perform this examination, increasing appointment flexibility, partnering with local optometry clinics and enhancing annual examination reminders to include more details about the examination. Recommendations suggested by staff include increasing patient education, setting expectations around the examination and implementing real-time feedback on image quality.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

识别糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的促进因素、障碍和机会领域:通过定性方法提高质量。
目的:质量改进工作旨在提高本机构糖尿病视网膜病变的年度筛查,但筛查率仍远低于目标。为了更好地了解我们卫生系统特有的促进因素、障碍和操作问题,并对护理途径有一个全面的了解,我们应用了“患者之声”工具包。方法:在拥有多个卫星社区诊所的大型城市学术医疗中心对患者和护理团队成员进行了深入访谈。与患者的访谈集中在促进和障碍每年糖尿病视网膜病变筛查。这些访谈被转录并组织成离散的代码,以确定初始主题。我们采访了参与糖尿病视网膜病变检查计划、执行或质量保证的临床工作人员。与护理团队成员的访谈集中在培训材料、相机操作和工作流程上。结果:通过对15例患者访谈的分析,我们发现促进因素包括内部动机、自动检查提醒、提供者提醒和当地验光办公室的利用。障碍包括相互竞争的需求、遥远的视网膜摄像头位置、有限的预约以及财务和保险问题。与13名护理团队成员的访谈产生了流程图,并在培训和操作工作流程中确定了机会领域。结论:纳入不同利益相关者的观点,可以深入了解完成年度糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的促进因素和障碍,从而为我们的具体卫生系统和操作提供量身定制的建议。建议的操作改进措施包括扩大可以进行这种检查的诊所,增加预约的灵活性,与当地验光诊所合作,以及加强年度检查提醒,包括更多关于检查的细节。工作人员提出的建议包括加强对患者的教育,设定对检查的期望,以及对图像质量进行实时反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信