Optimizing timing and cost-effective use of plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease.

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hsin-I Chang, Mi-Chia Ma, Kuo-Lun Huang, Chung-Gue Huang, Shu-Hua Huang, Chi-Wei Huang, Kun-Ju Lin, Chiung-Chih Chang
{"title":"Optimizing timing and cost-effective use of plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Hsin-I Chang, Mi-Chia Ma, Kuo-Lun Huang, Chung-Gue Huang, Shu-Hua Huang, Chi-Wei Huang, Kun-Ju Lin, Chiung-Chih Chang","doi":"10.1186/s13195-025-01851-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Early and cost-effective identification of amyloid positivity is crucial for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis. While amyloid PET is the gold standard, plasma biomarkers such as phosphorylated tau 217 (pTau217) provide a potential alternative. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of a combined-panel approach using machine learning models and evaluated the biomarker significance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 371 participants, including AD (n = 143), non-AD (n = 159), and cognitively unimpaired (CU, n = 69) controls. Combined panels of pTau217, pTau181, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NFL), Aβ42/40, and total tau were measured prior to the amyloid PET scan. The multiclass logistic (LR) regression, support vector machines, decision trees, and random forests (RF)-were applied to classify amyloid positivity (A+) at all stages or at early clinical stages (1-3). In AD, we tested whether the biomarker may define the clinical stagings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When benchmarked against amyloid PET, plasma biomarker-based stratification achieves an optimal balance between diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness. The multi-class LR performed equivalently with RF model in identifying A+. The combined plasma panel reached an > 92% accuracy in identifying A+, with performance increasing to 93.4% at early clinical stages. We ranked the importance of individual biomarkers and pTau217 alone achieved comparable accuracy (> 90%) and was the top-ranked biomarker in the LR or RF model. NFL and GFAP correlated significantly with Mini-Mental State Examination; however, these plasma biomarkers did not enhance clinical staging stratification.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The use of multiclass LR model enhances amyloid classification, particularly at earlier clinical stages. While the combined-panel approach is most accurate, pTau217 alone provides a cost-effective alternative for screening. These findings support the integration of plasma biomarkers and ML into clinical workflows for early detection and patient stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"194"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01851-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Early and cost-effective identification of amyloid positivity is crucial for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis. While amyloid PET is the gold standard, plasma biomarkers such as phosphorylated tau 217 (pTau217) provide a potential alternative. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of a combined-panel approach using machine learning models and evaluated the biomarker significance.

Methods: We enrolled 371 participants, including AD (n = 143), non-AD (n = 159), and cognitively unimpaired (CU, n = 69) controls. Combined panels of pTau217, pTau181, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NFL), Aβ42/40, and total tau were measured prior to the amyloid PET scan. The multiclass logistic (LR) regression, support vector machines, decision trees, and random forests (RF)-were applied to classify amyloid positivity (A+) at all stages or at early clinical stages (1-3). In AD, we tested whether the biomarker may define the clinical stagings.

Results: When benchmarked against amyloid PET, plasma biomarker-based stratification achieves an optimal balance between diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness. The multi-class LR performed equivalently with RF model in identifying A+. The combined plasma panel reached an > 92% accuracy in identifying A+, with performance increasing to 93.4% at early clinical stages. We ranked the importance of individual biomarkers and pTau217 alone achieved comparable accuracy (> 90%) and was the top-ranked biomarker in the LR or RF model. NFL and GFAP correlated significantly with Mini-Mental State Examination; however, these plasma biomarkers did not enhance clinical staging stratification.

Discussion: The use of multiclass LR model enhances amyloid classification, particularly at earlier clinical stages. While the combined-panel approach is most accurate, pTau217 alone provides a cost-effective alternative for screening. These findings support the integration of plasma biomarkers and ML into clinical workflows for early detection and patient stratification.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

优化阿尔茨海默病血浆生物标志物的使用时机和成本效益。
背景和目的:淀粉样蛋白阳性的早期和具有成本效益的识别对于阿尔茨海默病(AD)的诊断至关重要。虽然淀粉样蛋白PET是金标准,但血浆生物标志物如磷酸化tau 217 (pTau217)提供了一个潜在的替代方案。本研究评估了使用机器学习模型的组合面板方法的诊断准确性,并评估了生物标志物的意义。方法:我们招募了371名参与者,包括AD (n = 143),非AD (n = 159)和认知未受损(n = 69)对照组。在淀粉样蛋白PET扫描前,测量pTau217、pTau181、胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)、神经丝轻链(NFL)、Aβ42/40和总tau蛋白的组合水平。应用多类别logistic (LR)回归、支持向量机、决策树和随机森林(RF)对所有阶段或早期临床阶段的淀粉样蛋白阳性(A+)进行分类(1-3)。在AD中,我们测试了生物标志物是否可以定义临床分期。结果:当以淀粉样蛋白PET为基准时,基于血浆生物标志物的分层在诊断准确性和成本效益之间实现了最佳平衡。多类LR与RF模型对A+的识别效果相当。联合血浆检测在识别A+方面的准确率达到了50.92%,在早期临床阶段的准确率提高到93.4%。我们对单个生物标志物的重要性进行了排名,pTau217单独获得了相当的准确性(bbb90 %),是LR或RF模型中排名最高的生物标志物。NFL、GFAP与Mini-Mental State Examination有显著相关;然而,这些血浆生物标志物并没有增强临床分期分层。讨论:多分类LR模型的使用增强了淀粉样蛋白的分类,特别是在早期临床阶段。虽然联合面板方法是最准确的,但单独使用pTau217是一种具有成本效益的筛选方法。这些发现支持将血浆生物标志物和ML整合到临床工作流程中,以进行早期检测和患者分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信