Unveiling Structure of Tropical Estuarine Communities Through eDNA and Implications for Biomonitoring

IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Johan Pansu, Christine Chivas, Geoffrey Carlin, Jacob Gruythuysen, Marcelo Merten Cruz, Rachael A. Smith, Fréderique Viard, Stuart L. Simpson, Anthony A. Chariton
{"title":"Unveiling Structure of Tropical Estuarine Communities Through eDNA and Implications for Biomonitoring","authors":"Johan Pansu,&nbsp;Christine Chivas,&nbsp;Geoffrey Carlin,&nbsp;Jacob Gruythuysen,&nbsp;Marcelo Merten Cruz,&nbsp;Rachael A. Smith,&nbsp;Fréderique Viard,&nbsp;Stuart L. Simpson,&nbsp;Anthony A. Chariton","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tropical estuaries are hyper-diverse ecosystems, hosting essential habitats for freshwater, euryhaline, and marine life. Understanding how biological communities are distributed in these systems has long been a challenge because of their inherent dynamic nature and the diversity of interacting natural pressures and anthropogenic stressors they are subjected to. In addition, most studies focus on a single taxonomic group, hindering a comprehensive understanding of the interactive effects of natural and human-driven environmental variations on the different components of tropical estuarian biodiversity. In this study, we used environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to examine the structure of multi-taxonomic communities, from diatoms to fish, and their relationships with environmental drivers in three differentially impacted locations facing the Great Barrier Reef in Central Queensland (Australia). We first demonstrated that eDNA signals from sediment and water matrices provide complementary information and that both should be monitored for a more holistic understanding of community trajectories in anthropogenically impacted aquatic environments. We also observed that, independently of the taxonomic group considered, communities were primarily structured by the ecological conditions of the estuary. A within-estuary differentiation along an upstream–downstream gradient was detected but only for small-bodied organisms, which further adds credence to eDNA approaches as an ecologically relevant tool for monitoring fine-scale biodiversity patterns even in profoundly dynamic environments. Finally, the different communities exhibited contrasting response patterns, in terms of diversity, composition, and uniqueness, to the anthropogenic gradient. Hence, our findings emphasize the need for multi-taxonomic assessments, for which eDNA is well suited, to better understand the impacts of multiple stressors on biodiversity and thereby assist decision makers in the protection and management of tropical estuaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70180","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tropical estuaries are hyper-diverse ecosystems, hosting essential habitats for freshwater, euryhaline, and marine life. Understanding how biological communities are distributed in these systems has long been a challenge because of their inherent dynamic nature and the diversity of interacting natural pressures and anthropogenic stressors they are subjected to. In addition, most studies focus on a single taxonomic group, hindering a comprehensive understanding of the interactive effects of natural and human-driven environmental variations on the different components of tropical estuarian biodiversity. In this study, we used environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to examine the structure of multi-taxonomic communities, from diatoms to fish, and their relationships with environmental drivers in three differentially impacted locations facing the Great Barrier Reef in Central Queensland (Australia). We first demonstrated that eDNA signals from sediment and water matrices provide complementary information and that both should be monitored for a more holistic understanding of community trajectories in anthropogenically impacted aquatic environments. We also observed that, independently of the taxonomic group considered, communities were primarily structured by the ecological conditions of the estuary. A within-estuary differentiation along an upstream–downstream gradient was detected but only for small-bodied organisms, which further adds credence to eDNA approaches as an ecologically relevant tool for monitoring fine-scale biodiversity patterns even in profoundly dynamic environments. Finally, the different communities exhibited contrasting response patterns, in terms of diversity, composition, and uniqueness, to the anthropogenic gradient. Hence, our findings emphasize the need for multi-taxonomic assessments, for which eDNA is well suited, to better understand the impacts of multiple stressors on biodiversity and thereby assist decision makers in the protection and management of tropical estuaries.

Abstract Image

利用eDNA揭示热带河口群落结构及其生物监测意义
热带河口是高度多样化的生态系统,为淡水、泛盐和海洋生物提供了重要的栖息地。长期以来,了解生物群落如何在这些系统中分布一直是一个挑战,因为它们固有的动态性以及它们所受到的相互作用的自然压力和人为压力的多样性。此外,大多数研究集中在单一分类类群上,阻碍了对自然和人为驱动的环境变化对热带河口生物多样性不同组成部分的相互作用的全面理解。在这项研究中,我们使用环境DNA (eDNA)元条形码技术研究了澳大利亚昆士兰州中部大堡礁面临的三个不同影响地点的多分类群落结构,从硅藻到鱼类,以及它们与环境驱动因素的关系。我们首先证明了来自沉积物和水基质的eDNA信号提供了互补的信息,并且应该对两者进行监测,以便更全面地了解人为影响的水生环境中的群落轨迹。我们还观察到,独立于所考虑的分类群,群落主要由河口的生态条件构成。河口内沿上游-下游梯度存在分化,但仅适用于小体生物,这进一步证实了eDNA方法作为监测精细尺度生物多样性模式的生态学相关工具,即使在深度动态环境中也是如此。不同群落对人为梯度的响应模式在多样性、组成和独特性方面存在差异。因此,我们的研究结果强调需要多分类评估,以更好地了解多种压力源对生物多样性的影响,从而帮助决策者保护和管理热带河口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信