Qingwen Li, Wenxia Li, Chuangchuang Pan, Fanfan Nie, Mengjiao Xu, Lei Zhang, Ying Li
{"title":"Mechanical properties and energy evolution of unconfined and CFRP-confined coal samples with different height-to-diameter ratios","authors":"Qingwen Li, Wenxia Li, Chuangchuang Pan, Fanfan Nie, Mengjiao Xu, Lei Zhang, Ying Li","doi":"10.1007/s40571-025-00909-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using uniaxial compression tests and coupled FDM-DEM numerical simulations, the mechanical and energetic evolutions of unconfined and CFRP-confined coal samples were investigated under varying height-to-diameter ratio (HDR). The results indicate that peak strength decreases, while the elastic modulus increases nonlinearly with an increase in the HDR, and CFRP confinement significantly enhances the mechanical properties. The contact number increases, whereas the contact force decreases, with crack initiation and yield stress points identified through the second-order derivative of the crack number. For unconfined coal samples, damage propagation occurs from the center outward, while for CFRP-confined samples, it progresses from the ends toward the center. As the HDR increases, energy density and axial strain decrease, with geometric size differences and energy conversion emerging as critical factors for instability. CFRP-confined coal samples demonstrate greater energy storage and dissipation capacities compared to unconfined samples. The dissipated energy conversion for unconfined samples peaked at 10.76% at a HDR of 1.5 and was lowest at 5.53% at 3.0, while CFRP-confined samples peaked at 16.34% at 0.5 and dropped to 5.62% at 2.0. These findings reveal that an increasing HDR reduces ductility and raises instability risks, whereas CFRP confinement improves deformation resistance and energy dissipation, offering a theoretical basis for the reinforcement of coal samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":524,"journal":{"name":"Computational Particle Mechanics","volume":"12 4","pages":"2133 - 2149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Particle Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40571-025-00909-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Using uniaxial compression tests and coupled FDM-DEM numerical simulations, the mechanical and energetic evolutions of unconfined and CFRP-confined coal samples were investigated under varying height-to-diameter ratio (HDR). The results indicate that peak strength decreases, while the elastic modulus increases nonlinearly with an increase in the HDR, and CFRP confinement significantly enhances the mechanical properties. The contact number increases, whereas the contact force decreases, with crack initiation and yield stress points identified through the second-order derivative of the crack number. For unconfined coal samples, damage propagation occurs from the center outward, while for CFRP-confined samples, it progresses from the ends toward the center. As the HDR increases, energy density and axial strain decrease, with geometric size differences and energy conversion emerging as critical factors for instability. CFRP-confined coal samples demonstrate greater energy storage and dissipation capacities compared to unconfined samples. The dissipated energy conversion for unconfined samples peaked at 10.76% at a HDR of 1.5 and was lowest at 5.53% at 3.0, while CFRP-confined samples peaked at 16.34% at 0.5 and dropped to 5.62% at 2.0. These findings reveal that an increasing HDR reduces ductility and raises instability risks, whereas CFRP confinement improves deformation resistance and energy dissipation, offering a theoretical basis for the reinforcement of coal samples.
期刊介绍:
GENERAL OBJECTIVES: Computational Particle Mechanics (CPM) is a quarterly journal with the goal of publishing full-length original articles addressing the modeling and simulation of systems involving particles and particle methods. The goal is to enhance communication among researchers in the applied sciences who use "particles'''' in one form or another in their research.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES: Particle-based materials and numerical methods have become wide-spread in the natural and applied sciences, engineering, biology. The term "particle methods/mechanics'''' has now come to imply several different things to researchers in the 21st century, including:
(a) Particles as a physical unit in granular media, particulate flows, plasmas, swarms, etc.,
(b) Particles representing material phases in continua at the meso-, micro-and nano-scale and
(c) Particles as a discretization unit in continua and discontinua in numerical methods such as
Discrete Element Methods (DEM), Particle Finite Element Methods (PFEM), Molecular Dynamics (MD), and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH), to name a few.