Predicting geomechanical properties of heterogeneous shale using ensemble learning methods

IF 4.6 0 ENERGY & FUELS
Yang Chen , Shuheng Tang , Zhaodong Xi , Shasha Sun , Jingyu Wang , Donglin Lin , Ke Zhang , Xiaofan Mei
{"title":"Predicting geomechanical properties of heterogeneous shale using ensemble learning methods","authors":"Yang Chen ,&nbsp;Shuheng Tang ,&nbsp;Zhaodong Xi ,&nbsp;Shasha Sun ,&nbsp;Jingyu Wang ,&nbsp;Donglin Lin ,&nbsp;Ke Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaofan Mei","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.214148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate characterizing shale mechanical properties is crucial in oil and gas exploration and development. However, acquiring rock mechanical data remains challenging. This study investigates machine learning algorithms for predicting shale geomechanical properties using readily available data. A comprehensive dataset was collected, including confining pressure (CP), sampling orientation, Young's modulus (<span><math><mrow><mi>E</mi></mrow></math></span>) and Poisson's ratio (<span><math><mrow><mi>ν</mi></mrow></math></span>) from triaxial compression tests, as well as core analysis and conventional logging data. Three ensemble learning models were constructed following two strategies to predict <span><math><mrow><mi>E</mi></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mi>ν</mi></mrow></math></span>, with inputs from core analysis and logging parameters. The results indicate that the Random Forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) outperformed neural networks and other classical models. The LightGBM model exhibited the highest accuracy, with determination coefficient (R<sup>2</sup>) and mean relative error (MRE) being 0.82–0.85 and 6.70 %–8.36 % on test dataset. Density and orientation were the primary factors influencing shale mechanical properties, with relative importance being 0.285–0.301 and 0.178–0.230, respectively, while the CP, mineralogical composition and porosity are secondary controlling factors. Based on different core or logging parameter combinations, model performance was categorized into four levels: “optimal,” “suboptimal”, “poor” and “very poor”, ensuring adaptability to varying data conditions for mechanical property prediction. The LightGBM model was successfully applied in predicting Wufeng-Longmaxi shale mechanical properties, outperforming empirical formulas and demonstrating the advantages of ensemble learning. This study provides a practical tool for the rapid estimation of shale mechanical parameters, facilitating oil and gas development while improving economic efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 214148"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891025005068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate characterizing shale mechanical properties is crucial in oil and gas exploration and development. However, acquiring rock mechanical data remains challenging. This study investigates machine learning algorithms for predicting shale geomechanical properties using readily available data. A comprehensive dataset was collected, including confining pressure (CP), sampling orientation, Young's modulus (E) and Poisson's ratio (ν) from triaxial compression tests, as well as core analysis and conventional logging data. Three ensemble learning models were constructed following two strategies to predict E and ν, with inputs from core analysis and logging parameters. The results indicate that the Random Forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) outperformed neural networks and other classical models. The LightGBM model exhibited the highest accuracy, with determination coefficient (R2) and mean relative error (MRE) being 0.82–0.85 and 6.70 %–8.36 % on test dataset. Density and orientation were the primary factors influencing shale mechanical properties, with relative importance being 0.285–0.301 and 0.178–0.230, respectively, while the CP, mineralogical composition and porosity are secondary controlling factors. Based on different core or logging parameter combinations, model performance was categorized into four levels: “optimal,” “suboptimal”, “poor” and “very poor”, ensuring adaptability to varying data conditions for mechanical property prediction. The LightGBM model was successfully applied in predicting Wufeng-Longmaxi shale mechanical properties, outperforming empirical formulas and demonstrating the advantages of ensemble learning. This study provides a practical tool for the rapid estimation of shale mechanical parameters, facilitating oil and gas development while improving economic efficiency.
应用集合学习方法预测非均质页岩地质力学性质
准确表征页岩力学性质对油气勘探开发至关重要。然而,获取岩石力学数据仍然具有挑战性。本研究探讨了利用现成数据预测页岩地质力学特性的机器学习算法。收集了综合数据集,包括围压(CP)、采样方向、三轴压缩试验的杨氏模量(E)和泊松比(ν),以及岩心分析和常规测井数据。根据岩心分析和测井参数的输入,构建了两种预测E和ν的集成学习模型。结果表明,随机森林、极端梯度增强和光梯度增强机(LightGBM)优于神经网络和其他经典模型。LightGBM模型在测试数据集上的决定系数(R2)和平均相对误差(MRE)分别为0.82 ~ 0.85和6.70% ~ 8.36%,具有最高的准确度。密度和方位是影响页岩力学性质的主要因素,相对重要性分别为0.285 ~ 0.301和0.178 ~ 0.230,CP、矿物组成和孔隙度是次要控制因素。根据不同的岩心或测井参数组合,将模型性能分为“最优”、“次优”、“差”和“非常差”四个级别,保证了力学性能预测对不同数据条件的适应性。LightGBM模型成功应用于五峰—龙马溪页岩力学性质预测,优于经验公式,显示了集成学习的优势。该研究为快速估算页岩力学参数提供了实用工具,为油气开发提供了便利,同时也提高了经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信