{"title":"A custom-made sling to achieve personal goals in shoulder pain or subluxation in the subacute stroke phase: a pilot study","authors":"Emmeline Montané , Magali Pradié , Inès Bigarre , Claire Lebely , Alizée Lelièvre , Camille Cormier , Jacqueline Butterworth , Benoît Lepage , Philippe Marque , Xavier de Boissezon , Evelyne Castel-Lacanal","doi":"10.1016/j.rehab.2025.102014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The efficacy of the different shoulder orthoses available to prevent hemiplegic shoulder complications still remains debatable.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate how wearing a custom-made (CM) shoulder sling affected personal goals and complications among hemiplegic stroke patients undergoing realworld rehabilitation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective, single-center, non-randomized, pilot study on patients having a stroke within the last 6 months with hemiplegic shoulder pain/subluxation >5 mm. The primary outcome was achievement in three personal goals according to Goal Attainment Scaling one month after (week 5) compared to before (day 7) sling wearing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-two patients were included: 60 % male, 56.4 ± 12.1 years old. ≥1 goal was achieved by 90.5 % of patients after sling wearing (week 5) versus 36 % of patients before. VAS pain score (-1.3 ± 2.3; <em>p</em> = 0.01) and subluxation distance (-0.41±0.42 cm; <em>p</em> = 0.0001) were reduced at week 5. Both the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory score (+9.0 ± 13.1; <em>p</em> = 0.0003) and Fugl-Meyer upper-extremity score (+9.5 ± 9.5; <em>p</em> = 0.00002) were improved after sling wearing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We observed improvements in patient-desired outcomes, complications, and upper-limb functional recovery after CM sling wearing for 1-month.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>NCT04028999.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"68 7","pages":"Article 102014"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187706572500079X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The efficacy of the different shoulder orthoses available to prevent hemiplegic shoulder complications still remains debatable.
Objectives
To evaluate how wearing a custom-made (CM) shoulder sling affected personal goals and complications among hemiplegic stroke patients undergoing realworld rehabilitation.
Methods
A prospective, single-center, non-randomized, pilot study on patients having a stroke within the last 6 months with hemiplegic shoulder pain/subluxation >5 mm. The primary outcome was achievement in three personal goals according to Goal Attainment Scaling one month after (week 5) compared to before (day 7) sling wearing.
Results
Twenty-two patients were included: 60 % male, 56.4 ± 12.1 years old. ≥1 goal was achieved by 90.5 % of patients after sling wearing (week 5) versus 36 % of patients before. VAS pain score (-1.3 ± 2.3; p = 0.01) and subluxation distance (-0.41±0.42 cm; p = 0.0001) were reduced at week 5. Both the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory score (+9.0 ± 13.1; p = 0.0003) and Fugl-Meyer upper-extremity score (+9.5 ± 9.5; p = 0.00002) were improved after sling wearing.
Conclusion
We observed improvements in patient-desired outcomes, complications, and upper-limb functional recovery after CM sling wearing for 1-month.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine covers all areas of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine; such as: methods of evaluation of motor, sensory, cognitive and visceral impairments; acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain; disabilities in adult and children ; processes of rehabilitation in orthopaedic, rhumatological, neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary and urological diseases.