Household ownership of latrines does not ensure use: a scoping review.

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-08-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001527
Nicolas Gaffan, Alphonse Kpozehouen, Cyriaque Degbey, Yolaine Glele Ahanhanzo, Moussiliou Noël Paraïso
{"title":"Household ownership of latrines does not ensure use: a scoping review.","authors":"Nicolas Gaffan, Alphonse Kpozehouen, Cyriaque Degbey, Yolaine Glele Ahanhanzo, Moussiliou Noël Paraïso","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to conduct a scoping review of the factors associated with latrine utilisation by households.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We performed a scoping review to determine the factors associated with household latrine utilisation.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We conducted a bibliographic search using PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Epistemonikos and Semantic Scholar until April 2023.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>The papers we included met the following criteria: the study population included members of households equipped with latrines, regardless of their status, excluding children under five; the study followed an observational design; the study design was quantitative; the manuscript was in either French or English; the study focused on factors associated with latrine utilisation; the study employed multivariate methods and the study manuscript was published in a peer-reviewed journal.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>We conducted a narrative synthesis of key results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review selected 31 articles. The percentage of latrine utilisation spanned from 36.00% to 94.30%. Elderly individuals and those with lower educational attainment showed reduced latrine utilisation compared with younger and more educated people, respectively. Households without school-going children, those of larger size and those with lower economic status had less latrine utilisation than those with school-going children, smaller size and a higher wealth index. Some latrine attributes (age, level of household member involvement in construction, hand hygiene facilities, geographical accessibility, functionality, maintenance, cleanliness, type, superstructure, condition, etc) influenced latrine utilisation. Exposure to sanitation communication initiatives heightened the likelihood of latrine utilisation by individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study stresses the importance of improving children's education and implementing poverty reduction initiatives to enable households to afford adequate sanitation facilities. It also suggests empowering communities to build suitable latrines, promoting community-based sanitation models and emphasising the need to raise awareness of the adverse effects of open defecation through educational campaigns.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 2","pages":"e001527"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to conduct a scoping review of the factors associated with latrine utilisation by households.

Design: We performed a scoping review to determine the factors associated with household latrine utilisation.

Data sources: We conducted a bibliographic search using PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Epistemonikos and Semantic Scholar until April 2023.

Eligibility criteria: The papers we included met the following criteria: the study population included members of households equipped with latrines, regardless of their status, excluding children under five; the study followed an observational design; the study design was quantitative; the manuscript was in either French or English; the study focused on factors associated with latrine utilisation; the study employed multivariate methods and the study manuscript was published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Data extraction and synthesis: We conducted a narrative synthesis of key results.

Results: This review selected 31 articles. The percentage of latrine utilisation spanned from 36.00% to 94.30%. Elderly individuals and those with lower educational attainment showed reduced latrine utilisation compared with younger and more educated people, respectively. Households without school-going children, those of larger size and those with lower economic status had less latrine utilisation than those with school-going children, smaller size and a higher wealth index. Some latrine attributes (age, level of household member involvement in construction, hand hygiene facilities, geographical accessibility, functionality, maintenance, cleanliness, type, superstructure, condition, etc) influenced latrine utilisation. Exposure to sanitation communication initiatives heightened the likelihood of latrine utilisation by individuals.

Conclusion: The study stresses the importance of improving children's education and implementing poverty reduction initiatives to enable households to afford adequate sanitation facilities. It also suggests empowering communities to build suitable latrines, promoting community-based sanitation models and emphasising the need to raise awareness of the adverse effects of open defecation through educational campaigns.

家庭拥有厕所并不能保证使用:范围审查。
目的:本研究旨在对与家庭厕所使用相关的因素进行范围审查。设计:我们进行了一项范围审查,以确定与家庭厕所利用相关的因素。数据来源:截至2023年4月,我们使用PubMed、b谷歌Scholar、ScienceDirect、Epistemonikos和Semantic Scholar进行了文献检索。入选标准:我们纳入的论文符合以下标准:研究人群包括配备厕所的家庭成员,无论其状况如何,但不包括5岁以下儿童;该研究采用观察设计;研究设计是定量的;手稿不是法文就是英文;这项研究的重点是与厕所利用有关的因素;该研究采用多变量方法,研究手稿发表在同行评审期刊上。数据提取和综合:我们对关键结果进行了叙述性综合。结果:本综述选取了31篇文献。厕所使用率从36.00%到94.30%不等。与年轻人和受教育程度较高的人相比,老年人和受教育程度较低的人的厕所使用率分别较低。没有学龄儿童的家庭、规模较大的家庭和经济地位较低的家庭的厕所使用率低于有学龄儿童、规模较小和财富指数较高的家庭。一些厕所属性(年龄、家庭成员参与建设的程度、手卫生设施、地理可达性、功能、维护、清洁度、类型、上层建筑、条件等)影响厕所的利用。接触卫生传播倡议提高了个人使用厕所的可能性。结论:该研究强调了改善儿童教育和实施减贫举措的重要性,以使家庭能够负担足够的卫生设施。它还建议授权社区建造合适的厕所,促进以社区为基础的卫生模式,并强调需要通过教育运动提高对露天排便不利影响的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信