Improving the rate of use of fascia iliaca compartment blocks in patients presenting with hip fractures.

IF 2
CJEM Pub Date : 2025-08-18 DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00990-7
Kristin O'Neill, Joseph Boyle, Logan Haynes, Brittany Ellis, Rob Woods, Taofiq Oyedokun, Sachin V Trivedi
{"title":"Improving the rate of use of fascia iliaca compartment blocks in patients presenting with hip fractures.","authors":"Kristin O'Neill, Joseph Boyle, Logan Haynes, Brittany Ellis, Rob Woods, Taofiq Oyedokun, Sachin V Trivedi","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00990-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with hip fractures are typically treated with opioids, which are associated with adverse events such as delirium and respiratory depression. The fascia iliaca compartment block (hereafter fascia iliaca block) is a regional analgesia technique which avoids these negative outcomes. We sought to increase the rate of use of this technique to 50% of all patients with hip fractures who presented to our EDs within an 18-month period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We held three Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles designed in accordance with surveys sent to our physician group. The first cycle consisted of the dissemination of educational materials and standardization of equipment carts. Next, we held educational sessions for staff and trainee physicians. The third cycle consisted of additional education, Audit and Feedback methodology and incentives. Our outcome measure was the rate of fascia iliaca blocks performed. We tracked the number of unique physicians performing the fascia iliaca block as well as physician-reported comfort with the procedure for our process measures. Our balancing measure was the rate of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We went from a baseline rate of 2.0% to 22.6% of patients receiving fascia iliaca blocks. The number of physicians doing this increased from 6 pre-project to 35. Only one adverse event occurred (arterial puncture), which did not cause any significant patient harm. Our statistical process control chart revealed special cause variation in the form of a shift.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although we did not meet our goal, we were able to significantly improve the rate of fascia iliaca blocks performed at our center. This was largely achieved through educational interventions. Our approach can be adapted by other centers looking to pursue a similar project.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00990-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with hip fractures are typically treated with opioids, which are associated with adverse events such as delirium and respiratory depression. The fascia iliaca compartment block (hereafter fascia iliaca block) is a regional analgesia technique which avoids these negative outcomes. We sought to increase the rate of use of this technique to 50% of all patients with hip fractures who presented to our EDs within an 18-month period.

Methods: We held three Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles designed in accordance with surveys sent to our physician group. The first cycle consisted of the dissemination of educational materials and standardization of equipment carts. Next, we held educational sessions for staff and trainee physicians. The third cycle consisted of additional education, Audit and Feedback methodology and incentives. Our outcome measure was the rate of fascia iliaca blocks performed. We tracked the number of unique physicians performing the fascia iliaca block as well as physician-reported comfort with the procedure for our process measures. Our balancing measure was the rate of adverse events.

Results: We went from a baseline rate of 2.0% to 22.6% of patients receiving fascia iliaca blocks. The number of physicians doing this increased from 6 pre-project to 35. Only one adverse event occurred (arterial puncture), which did not cause any significant patient harm. Our statistical process control chart revealed special cause variation in the form of a shift.

Conclusion: Although we did not meet our goal, we were able to significantly improve the rate of fascia iliaca blocks performed at our center. This was largely achieved through educational interventions. Our approach can be adapted by other centers looking to pursue a similar project.

提高髋部骨折患者髂筋膜间室阻滞的使用率。
背景:髋部骨折急诊科(ED)患者通常使用阿片类药物治疗,阿片类药物与谵妄和呼吸抑制等不良事件相关。髂筋膜腔室阻滞(以下简称髂筋膜阻滞)是一种局部镇痛技术,可避免这些不良后果。我们试图在18个月内到急诊科就诊的所有髋部骨折患者中,将该技术的使用率提高到50%。方法:我们进行了三个计划-做-研究-行动周期,根据发给我们医生组的调查设计。第一个周期包括分发教育材料和使设备推车标准化。接下来,我们为员工和实习医生举办了教育课程。第三个周期包括额外的教育、审计和反馈方法和奖励。我们的结果测量是髂筋膜阻滞的实施率。我们跟踪了执行髂筋膜阻滞的独特医生的数量,以及医生报告的对我们的过程措施的程序的舒适度。我们的平衡指标是不良事件发生率。结果:接受髂筋膜阻滞的患者的基线率从2.0%上升到22.6%。从事这项工作的医生人数从项目前的6人增加到35人。仅发生1例不良事件(动脉穿刺),未对患者造成重大伤害。我们的统计过程控制图以移位的形式揭示了特殊原因的变化。结论:虽然我们没有达到我们的目标,但我们能够显著提高在我们中心进行髂筋膜阻滞的率。这在很大程度上是通过教育干预实现的。我们的方法可以被其他寻求类似项目的中心采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信