Long-term outcomes of amputation in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS): a mixed-methods study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Daniël Pc van der Spek, Julian Ghantous, Tjebbe Hagenaars, Marieke A Paping, Frank Jpm Huygen, Maaike Dirckx
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of amputation in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS): a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Daniël Pc van der Spek, Julian Ghantous, Tjebbe Hagenaars, Marieke A Paping, Frank Jpm Huygen, Maaike Dirckx","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Amputation in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) remains controversial, with variable outcomes in quality of life (QoL), disability, pain reduction, and complications. This study aims to evaluate long-term outcomes in CRPS patients who underwent amputation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study combined with a cross-sectional survey of all CRPS patients who underwent limb amputation between 2003 and 2023 at the Erasmus MC University Medical Center. Preamputation and short-term postamputation outcomes were extracted from medical records, with short-term pain scores reflecting measurements within the first year after amputation. Long-term outcomes, including QoL, disability, pain, and satisfaction, were assessed through patient-reported questionnaires. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the presence of a neurostimulator implant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 39 patients with a median CRPS Severity Score of 12 (IQR 11-13) were included. 34 patients (87%) completed the survey a median of 6.4 years (IQR 3.0-11.7) after amputation. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey yielded mean physical and mental health summary scores of 45.4 (±26.1) and 67.7 (±22.3), respectively. The mean Pain Disability Index score was 29.3 (±15.1). Pain decreased by a mean of 3.54 points (95% CI: 2.46 to 4.62) at short-term follow-up (median 5 months, IQR 2-6) and 2.71 points (95% CI: 1.76 to 3.65) at long-term follow-up. Residual limb pain occurred in 77%, phantom limb pain in 85%, and CRPS recurrence in the stump in 10%. Overall, 94% of respondents were satisfied and would choose amputation again. Neurostimulator status did not influence measured outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort of severe, therapy-resistant CRPS, amputation was associated with meaningful improvements in QoL, disability, and pain in carefully selected cases, although complications remained common. Amputation should, therefore, be reserved as a last-resort intervention, offered only in specialized multidisciplinary centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106918","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Amputation in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) remains controversial, with variable outcomes in quality of life (QoL), disability, pain reduction, and complications. This study aims to evaluate long-term outcomes in CRPS patients who underwent amputation.

Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study combined with a cross-sectional survey of all CRPS patients who underwent limb amputation between 2003 and 2023 at the Erasmus MC University Medical Center. Preamputation and short-term postamputation outcomes were extracted from medical records, with short-term pain scores reflecting measurements within the first year after amputation. Long-term outcomes, including QoL, disability, pain, and satisfaction, were assessed through patient-reported questionnaires. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the presence of a neurostimulator implant.

Results: A total of 39 patients with a median CRPS Severity Score of 12 (IQR 11-13) were included. 34 patients (87%) completed the survey a median of 6.4 years (IQR 3.0-11.7) after amputation. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey yielded mean physical and mental health summary scores of 45.4 (±26.1) and 67.7 (±22.3), respectively. The mean Pain Disability Index score was 29.3 (±15.1). Pain decreased by a mean of 3.54 points (95% CI: 2.46 to 4.62) at short-term follow-up (median 5 months, IQR 2-6) and 2.71 points (95% CI: 1.76 to 3.65) at long-term follow-up. Residual limb pain occurred in 77%, phantom limb pain in 85%, and CRPS recurrence in the stump in 10%. Overall, 94% of respondents were satisfied and would choose amputation again. Neurostimulator status did not influence measured outcomes.

Conclusions: In this cohort of severe, therapy-resistant CRPS, amputation was associated with meaningful improvements in QoL, disability, and pain in carefully selected cases, although complications remained common. Amputation should, therefore, be reserved as a last-resort intervention, offered only in specialized multidisciplinary centers.

复杂局部疼痛综合征(CRPS)患者截肢的长期结果:一项混合方法研究。
复杂局部疼痛综合征(CRPS)患者的截肢治疗仍然存在争议,在生活质量(QoL)、残疾、疼痛减轻和并发症方面存在不同的结果。本研究旨在评估接受截肢的CRPS患者的长期预后。方法:我们进行了一项单中心回顾性观察性研究,并对2003年至2023年在Erasmus MC大学医学中心接受截肢手术的所有CRPS患者进行了横断面调查。从医疗记录中提取截肢前和截肢后的短期结果,短期疼痛评分反映截肢后一年内的测量结果。长期结果,包括生活质量、残疾、疼痛和满意度,通过患者报告的问卷进行评估。根据植入神经刺激器的情况进行亚组分析。结果:共纳入39例患者,中位CRPS严重程度评分为12 (IQR 11-13)。34例患者(87%)在截肢后中位6.4年(IQR 3.0-11.7)完成调查。36项简短健康调查的平均身心健康总结得分分别为45.4(±26.1)分和67.7(±22.3)分。平均疼痛失能指数评分为29.3(±15.1)分。短期随访(中位5个月,IQR 2-6)疼痛平均下降3.54点(95% CI: 2.46 - 4.62),长期随访平均下降2.71点(95% CI: 1.76 - 3.65)。残肢痛占77%,幻肢痛占85%,残肢CRPS复发占10%。总体而言,94%的受访者满意并愿意再次选择截肢。神经刺激器状态不影响测量结果。结论:在这组严重的、治疗难治性CRPS患者中,在精心挑选的病例中,截肢与生活质量、残疾和疼痛的显著改善相关,尽管并发症仍然很常见。因此,截肢应保留为最后手段,只在专门的多学科中心提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信