Effectiveness of multimodal analgesia on surgically treated geriatric hip fracture patients: a propensity score matching analysis.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Eic Ju Lim, Chul-Ho Kim, Ji Wan Kim
{"title":"Effectiveness of multimodal analgesia on surgically treated geriatric hip fracture patients: a propensity score matching analysis.","authors":"Eic Ju Lim, Chul-Ho Kim, Ji Wan Kim","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate whether multimodal analgesia can decrease pain scores while reducing opioid usage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative study was performed in a single institution. Data were collected from medical records between January 2008 and December 2023 for patients who underwent surgical treatment for hip fracture (femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric fractures). A standardized multimodal analgesia protocol for hip fracture, encompassing a systematic approach for analgesic prescription, anesthesia type, and regional nerve block, was implemented starting in 2022. We excluded the years 2019-2021 as a transition period. Patients treated between 2008 and 2018 formed the group without multimodal analgesia (the control group, n=1088), and those treated between 2022 and 2023 formed the multimodal analgesia group (n=306). Using propensity score matching, we matched patients in the multimodal analgesia group 1:1 to those in the control group. Primary outcomes were pain scores (visual analog scale: 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours postoperatively) and oral opioid use within 48 hours postoperatively, both compared between the two groups. Rehabilitation rates, postoperative complications, and mortality were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following propensity score matching, each group included 280 patients. The mean age was 75.5±11.9 years (range, 20-99 years) and 76.9±11.7 years (range, 35-99 years) in the control group and multimodal analgesia group, respectively. Male patients accounted for 31% and 30%, respectively. Postoperatively, the multimodal analgesia group showed lower pain scores (6 hour: 1.9 vs 2.9, p<0.001; 24 hours: 2.0 vs 2.4, p=0.001; 48 hours: 1.7 vs 2.2, p<0.001) and 48-hour opioid usage (5.5 vs 13.3 mg, p=0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings showed that implementing a multimodal analgesia protocol for hip fracture surgery was associated with lower postoperative pain and reduced opioid consumption, supporting the adoption of multimodal analgesia as a standardized perioperative pain management approach in geriatric patients with hip fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To investigate whether multimodal analgesia can decrease pain scores while reducing opioid usage.

Methods: This retrospective comparative study was performed in a single institution. Data were collected from medical records between January 2008 and December 2023 for patients who underwent surgical treatment for hip fracture (femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric fractures). A standardized multimodal analgesia protocol for hip fracture, encompassing a systematic approach for analgesic prescription, anesthesia type, and regional nerve block, was implemented starting in 2022. We excluded the years 2019-2021 as a transition period. Patients treated between 2008 and 2018 formed the group without multimodal analgesia (the control group, n=1088), and those treated between 2022 and 2023 formed the multimodal analgesia group (n=306). Using propensity score matching, we matched patients in the multimodal analgesia group 1:1 to those in the control group. Primary outcomes were pain scores (visual analog scale: 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours postoperatively) and oral opioid use within 48 hours postoperatively, both compared between the two groups. Rehabilitation rates, postoperative complications, and mortality were also compared.

Results: Following propensity score matching, each group included 280 patients. The mean age was 75.5±11.9 years (range, 20-99 years) and 76.9±11.7 years (range, 35-99 years) in the control group and multimodal analgesia group, respectively. Male patients accounted for 31% and 30%, respectively. Postoperatively, the multimodal analgesia group showed lower pain scores (6 hour: 1.9 vs 2.9, p<0.001; 24 hours: 2.0 vs 2.4, p=0.001; 48 hours: 1.7 vs 2.2, p<0.001) and 48-hour opioid usage (5.5 vs 13.3 mg, p=0.014).

Conclusions: Our findings showed that implementing a multimodal analgesia protocol for hip fracture surgery was associated with lower postoperative pain and reduced opioid consumption, supporting the adoption of multimodal analgesia as a standardized perioperative pain management approach in geriatric patients with hip fractures.

多模式镇痛对手术治疗的老年髋部骨折患者的有效性:倾向评分匹配分析。
背景:探讨多模式镇痛是否能在减少阿片类药物使用的同时降低疼痛评分。方法:本回顾性比较研究在单一机构进行。数据收集自2008年1月至2023年12月接受髋部骨折(股骨颈、粗隆间和粗隆下骨折)手术治疗的患者的医疗记录。从2022年开始实施髋部骨折的标准化多模式镇痛方案,包括镇痛处方、麻醉类型和区域神经阻滞的系统方法。我们排除了2019-2021年作为过渡期。2008年至2018年治疗的患者为无多模态镇痛组(对照组,n=1088), 2022年至2023年治疗的患者为多模态镇痛组(n=306)。使用倾向评分匹配,我们将多模式镇痛组患者与对照组患者1:1匹配。主要结果是疼痛评分(视觉模拟量表:术后6小时、12小时、24小时和48小时)和术后48小时内口服阿片类药物的使用,两组之间进行比较。比较两组患者的康复率、术后并发症和死亡率。结果:经倾向评分匹配,每组纳入280例患者。对照组和多模式镇痛组患者平均年龄分别为75.5±11.9岁(范围20 ~ 99岁)和76.9±11.7岁(范围35 ~ 99岁)。男性患者分别占31%和30%。术后,多模式镇痛组疼痛评分较低(6小时:1.9 vs 2.9)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在髋部骨折手术中实施多模式镇痛方案与术后疼痛降低和阿片类药物消耗减少相关,支持采用多模式镇痛作为老年髋部骨折患者围手术期疼痛管理的标准化方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信