Involvement of older adults in shared decision-making on care transitions in the UK: An interpretative qualitative systematic review.

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Lucia Halamová, Louise Locock, Andrew Maclaren, Stephen Makin, Louise Phillips
{"title":"Involvement of older adults in shared decision-making on care transitions in the UK: An interpretative qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Lucia Halamová, Louise Locock, Andrew Maclaren, Stephen Makin, Louise Phillips","doi":"10.1017/S0144686X25100123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global population is ageing rapidly, emphasising the need to understand the decision-making processes of older adults regarding potential care transitions. Gerontological research has focused on healthcare decisions, with less information on living situation choices of older adults. This review explored older adults' experiences with their involvement in decision-making processes related to transitioning into care facilities in the United Kingdom. From a systematic search of articles, nine were reviewed using thematic narrative synthesis. Four themes with nine subthemes were identified: <i>Involvement in decision-making</i> (Exclusion of older adults, Usefulness of involvement), <i>The necessity of moving</i> (Triggers for moves, The role of family), <i>Timely planning</i> (Helpfulness of planning, Planning avoidance), and <i>Factors for choosing a care home</i> (Non-quality factors, Quality factors, Continuity of life). These themes highlighted the issue of inadequate involvement of older adults in decision-making, often resulting in negative consequences like regret and difficulty settling into new care settings. <i>The necessity of moving</i> arose from sudden events or increased support needs. Some older adults acknowledged the necessity due to declining health or to spare family burden, while relatives grappled emotionally, postponing the choice. <i>Timely planning</i> was found to be beneficial practically and emotionally, facilitating smoother transitions. However, participants would rarely plan and discuss such matters early. Older adults focused on personal experiences and trusted sources rather than publicly available information when considering <i>Factors for choosing a care home</i>. The findings show the need for greater inclusion of older adults in decisions related to their care and the importance of early planning and providing preferred types and formats of information to aid decisions. Future research should focus on a better understanding of older adults' preferences for successful involvement in care decisions, with support and guidance for others involved in the decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51364,"journal":{"name":"Ageing & Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7618013/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X25100123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global population is ageing rapidly, emphasising the need to understand the decision-making processes of older adults regarding potential care transitions. Gerontological research has focused on healthcare decisions, with less information on living situation choices of older adults. This review explored older adults' experiences with their involvement in decision-making processes related to transitioning into care facilities in the United Kingdom. From a systematic search of articles, nine were reviewed using thematic narrative synthesis. Four themes with nine subthemes were identified: Involvement in decision-making (Exclusion of older adults, Usefulness of involvement), The necessity of moving (Triggers for moves, The role of family), Timely planning (Helpfulness of planning, Planning avoidance), and Factors for choosing a care home (Non-quality factors, Quality factors, Continuity of life). These themes highlighted the issue of inadequate involvement of older adults in decision-making, often resulting in negative consequences like regret and difficulty settling into new care settings. The necessity of moving arose from sudden events or increased support needs. Some older adults acknowledged the necessity due to declining health or to spare family burden, while relatives grappled emotionally, postponing the choice. Timely planning was found to be beneficial practically and emotionally, facilitating smoother transitions. However, participants would rarely plan and discuss such matters early. Older adults focused on personal experiences and trusted sources rather than publicly available information when considering Factors for choosing a care home. The findings show the need for greater inclusion of older adults in decisions related to their care and the importance of early planning and providing preferred types and formats of information to aid decisions. Future research should focus on a better understanding of older adults' preferences for successful involvement in care decisions, with support and guidance for others involved in the decisions.

在英国,老年人参与护理过渡的共同决策:一项解释性质的系统评价。
全球人口正在迅速老龄化,这强调了了解老年人关于潜在护理转变的决策过程的必要性。老年学研究主要集中在医疗保健决策上,而关于老年人生活状况选择的信息较少。本综述探讨了英国老年人参与过渡到护理机构的决策过程的经验。通过对文章的系统检索,九篇文章采用主题叙事综合法进行了综述。确定了四个主题和九个副主题:参与决策(老年人的排除,参与的有用性),搬家的必要性(搬家的触发因素,家庭的角色),及时计划(计划的帮助,计划的回避)和选择养老院的因素(非质量因素,质量因素,生活的连续性)。这些主题突出了老年人参与决策不足的问题,往往导致后悔和难以适应新的护理环境等负面后果。搬家的必要性来自突发事件或增加的支持需求。一些老年人承认,由于健康状况下降或减轻家庭负担,这是必要的,而亲戚们则在情绪上挣扎,推迟了选择。及时的计划被发现在实际和情感上都是有益的,促进了更顺利的过渡。然而,与会者很少会提前计划和讨论这些问题。老年人在考虑选择养老院的因素时,更关注个人经历和可信赖的来源,而不是公开的信息。研究结果表明,需要更多地让老年人参与与其护理有关的决策,以及早期规划和提供首选类型和格式的信息以帮助决策的重要性。未来的研究应侧重于更好地了解老年人对成功参与护理决策的偏好,并为参与决策的其他人提供支持和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ageing & Society
Ageing & Society GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.00%
发文量
144
期刊介绍: Ageing & Society is an interdisciplinary and international journal devoted to the understanding of human ageing and the circumstances of older people in their social and cultural contexts. It draws contributions and has readers from many disciplines including gerontology, sociology, demography, psychology, economics, medicine, social policy and the humanities. Ageing & Society promotes high-quality original research which is relevant to an international audience to encourage the exchange of ideas across the broad audience of multidisciplinary academics and practitioners working in the field of ageing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信