Parent-Engaged Development of the Emergency Pediatric Inclusive Communication Framework.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Colleen K Gutman, Antionette McFarlane, K Casey Lion, Carma L Bylund, Carla L Fisher, Paul L Aronson, Rosemarie Fernandez
{"title":"Parent-Engaged Development of the Emergency Pediatric Inclusive Communication Framework.","authors":"Colleen K Gutman, Antionette McFarlane, K Casey Lion, Carma L Bylund, Carla L Fisher, Paul L Aronson, Rosemarie Fernandez","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.103125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implicit racial biases are well documented in the pediatric emergency department (ED). Physician communication may be a modifiable behavior through which biases contribute to health disparities. We aimed to establish expert consensus regarding the ways in which physician communication is likely to be influenced by racial bias and lead to inequity in the pediatric ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a modified Delphi approach to establish consensus among a panel of experts (parents of pediatric ED patients of color [n =3], physicians and researchers with relevant expertise [n = 10]). The consensus process involved two rounds of moderated panel discussion followed by an online questionnaire. Assessed physician behaviors were generated from the panel discussions and from our prior qualitative research with physicians and parents from the pediatric ED. Panelists used 5-point Likert scales to rank the likelihood that physician behaviors were racially biased and the extent to which this contributed to inequity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 49 assessed physician behaviors, 28 met consensus as likely to be racially biased, including 12 assumptions that inform physician communication (assumptions about parent social capacity, parent emotions, and the physician's role in the parent-physician interaction) and 16 communication behaviors (empathic communication, listening, information sharing, and engagement in decisions).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Guided by communication accommodation theory and patient-centered communication, our findings support a conceptual framework demonstrating pathways through which implicit racial biases lead to child health inequity. This research creates a foundation for subsequent efforts aimed at identifying and mitigating the effects of implicit racial bias in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"103125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2025.103125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Implicit racial biases are well documented in the pediatric emergency department (ED). Physician communication may be a modifiable behavior through which biases contribute to health disparities. We aimed to establish expert consensus regarding the ways in which physician communication is likely to be influenced by racial bias and lead to inequity in the pediatric ED.

Methods: We used a modified Delphi approach to establish consensus among a panel of experts (parents of pediatric ED patients of color [n =3], physicians and researchers with relevant expertise [n = 10]). The consensus process involved two rounds of moderated panel discussion followed by an online questionnaire. Assessed physician behaviors were generated from the panel discussions and from our prior qualitative research with physicians and parents from the pediatric ED. Panelists used 5-point Likert scales to rank the likelihood that physician behaviors were racially biased and the extent to which this contributed to inequity.

Results: Of 49 assessed physician behaviors, 28 met consensus as likely to be racially biased, including 12 assumptions that inform physician communication (assumptions about parent social capacity, parent emotions, and the physician's role in the parent-physician interaction) and 16 communication behaviors (empathic communication, listening, information sharing, and engagement in decisions).

Conclusion: Guided by communication accommodation theory and patient-centered communication, our findings support a conceptual framework demonstrating pathways through which implicit racial biases lead to child health inequity. This research creates a foundation for subsequent efforts aimed at identifying and mitigating the effects of implicit racial bias in the ED.

急诊儿童包容性沟通框架的家长参与发展。
背景:隐性种族偏见在儿科急诊科(ED)中有很好的记录。医生沟通可能是一种可改变的行为,偏见通过这种行为导致健康差异。我们的目标是就医生沟通可能受到种族偏见影响并导致儿科ED不公平的方式建立专家共识。方法:我们使用改进的德尔菲法在专家小组(有色人种儿科ED患者的父母[n =3],医生和具有相关专业知识的研究人员[n = 10])中建立共识。达成共识的过程包括两轮有主持人的小组讨论,然后是一份在线问卷。评估的医生行为来自小组讨论和我们之前对儿科急诊科医生和家长的定性研究。小组成员使用5分李克特量表对医生行为存在种族偏见的可能性及其导致不平等的程度进行排名。结果:在49项被评估的医生行为中,28项被认为可能存在种族偏见,包括12项关于医生沟通的假设(关于父母社会能力、父母情绪和医生在父母-医生互动中的角色的假设)和16项沟通行为(共情沟通、倾听、信息共享和参与决策)。结论:在沟通调节理论和以患者为中心的沟通的指导下,我们的研究结果支持了一个概念框架,揭示了隐性种族偏见导致儿童健康不平等的途径。这项研究为后续旨在识别和减轻ED中隐性种族偏见影响的努力奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信