A Greater Rate of Return to High-Impact Sports Favoring Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Compared with Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Roderick J M Vossen, Gaby V Ten Noever de Brauw, Jelle P van der List, Gino M M J Kerkhoffs, Andrew D Pearle, Hendrik A Zuiderbaan
{"title":"A Greater Rate of Return to High-Impact Sports Favoring Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Compared with Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Roderick J M Vossen, Gaby V Ten Noever de Brauw, Jelle P van der List, Gino M M J Kerkhoffs, Andrew D Pearle, Hendrik A Zuiderbaan","doi":"10.1055/a-2684-8148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several studies have demonstrated the importance of patient expectation management following surgery, as this is a crucial factor influencing postoperative outcomes. Informing patients on the likelihood on return to sport (RTS) following a knee arthroplasty is therefore important. This systematic review aimed to compare RTS rates and RTS rates per sport-impact level for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), or patellofemoral knee arthroplasty (PFA). A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane up to June 1, 2024. Studies reporting on RTS rate following TKA, medial UKA, or PFA were included. RTS rates per sport impact level, Tegner-Lysholm, and University of California and Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scores were extracted. Outcomes were compared with meta-analysis using random-effect models. Thirty-eight studies were included for qualitative assessment, of which eight for meta-analysis, comprising 7,634 patients. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly greater likelihood for UKA patients (80.7% [18.4-100%]) to RTS than TKA patients (69.0% [4.1-100%]; odds ratio: 1.87 [1.23-2.85], <i>p</i> = 0.004). In high-impact sports, UKA patients (65.4% [18.4-100%]) were able to RTS at a higher rate than TKA patients (TKA 4.4% [4.1-12.5%]). RTS to low- and moderate-impact sports were similar. Postoperative UCLA activity score was superior for UKA patients and postoperative Tegner scores between UKA and TKA were similar. PFA patients returned to sports at a low rate (low-impact 42.4% [41.2-43.5%]; moderate-impact 35.0% [34.8-41.2%]; high-impact 20.5% [17.4-35.3%]). UKA Patients had a significantly higher overall RTS rate than TKA patients. Over 50% of UKA patients were able to return to high-impact sports, whereas only 5% of TKA patients achieved this outcome. The likelihood of RTS appeared lowest among patients who underwent PFA. A more liberal counseling regarding return to high-impact sports following UKA may be justified.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2684-8148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated the importance of patient expectation management following surgery, as this is a crucial factor influencing postoperative outcomes. Informing patients on the likelihood on return to sport (RTS) following a knee arthroplasty is therefore important. This systematic review aimed to compare RTS rates and RTS rates per sport-impact level for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), or patellofemoral knee arthroplasty (PFA). A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane up to June 1, 2024. Studies reporting on RTS rate following TKA, medial UKA, or PFA were included. RTS rates per sport impact level, Tegner-Lysholm, and University of California and Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scores were extracted. Outcomes were compared with meta-analysis using random-effect models. Thirty-eight studies were included for qualitative assessment, of which eight for meta-analysis, comprising 7,634 patients. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly greater likelihood for UKA patients (80.7% [18.4-100%]) to RTS than TKA patients (69.0% [4.1-100%]; odds ratio: 1.87 [1.23-2.85], p = 0.004). In high-impact sports, UKA patients (65.4% [18.4-100%]) were able to RTS at a higher rate than TKA patients (TKA 4.4% [4.1-12.5%]). RTS to low- and moderate-impact sports were similar. Postoperative UCLA activity score was superior for UKA patients and postoperative Tegner scores between UKA and TKA were similar. PFA patients returned to sports at a low rate (low-impact 42.4% [41.2-43.5%]; moderate-impact 35.0% [34.8-41.2%]; high-impact 20.5% [17.4-35.3%]). UKA Patients had a significantly higher overall RTS rate than TKA patients. Over 50% of UKA patients were able to return to high-impact sports, whereas only 5% of TKA patients achieved this outcome. The likelihood of RTS appeared lowest among patients who underwent PFA. A more liberal counseling regarding return to high-impact sports following UKA may be justified.

与全膝关节置换术相比,单室膝关节置换术的高冲击运动的回报率更高:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
一些研究已经证明了术后患者期望管理的重要性,因为这是影响术后结果的关键因素。因此告知患者膝关节置换术后恢复运动的可能性(RTS)是很重要的。本系统综述旨在比较原发性全膝关节置换术(TKA)、单室膝关节置换术(UKA)或髌骨股膝关节置换术(PFA)的RTS率和每运动冲击水平的RTS率。文献检索在PubMed, Embase和Cochrane进行,截止到2024年6月1日。报告TKA、内侧UKA或PFA后RTS率的研究被纳入。提取了每项运动影响水平的RTS率、Tegner-Lysholm和加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)的活动得分。结果采用随机效应模型进行meta分析比较。38项研究纳入定性评估,其中8项用于荟萃分析,包括7,634例患者。meta分析显示,UKA患者发生RTS的可能性(80.7%[18.4-100%])显著高于TKA患者(69.0%[4.1-100%]);优势比:1.87 [1.23-2.85],p = 0.004。在高强度运动中,UKA患者(65.4%[18.4-100%])的RTS发生率高于TKA患者(4.4%[4.1-12.5%])。RTS与低冲击和中等冲击运动相似。UKA患者术后UCLA活动评分优于TKA患者,UKA与TKA患者术后Tegner评分相似。PFA患者恢复运动的比例较低(低冲击42.4%[41.2-43.5%],中等冲击35.0%[34.8-41.2%],高冲击20.5%[17.4-35.3%])。UKA患者的总体RTS率明显高于TKA患者。超过50%的UKA患者能够恢复高强度运动,而只有5%的TKA患者实现了这一结果。接受PFA的患者发生RTS的可能性最低。在UKA之后,对重返高强度运动进行更宽松的咨询可能是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信