"It's a Big Ordeal": A Mixed Methods Study of the Experiences of non-HIV STI Testing Among Trans and Gender Diverse People.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ashley Lacombe-Duncan, Shanna K Kattari, Rebecca Emrick, Flyn Alexander, Hadas Kluger, Leo Kattari, Ashton Niedzwiecki, Ayden I Scheim, Brayden A Misiolek
{"title":"\"It's a Big Ordeal\": A Mixed Methods Study of the Experiences of non-HIV STI Testing Among Trans and Gender Diverse People.","authors":"Ashley Lacombe-Duncan, Shanna K Kattari, Rebecca Emrick, Flyn Alexander, Hadas Kluger, Leo Kattari, Ashton Niedzwiecki, Ayden I Scheim, Brayden A Misiolek","doi":"10.1080/19317611.2025.2536252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) persons are disproportionately affected by sexually transmitted infection (STI) inequities. Research predominantly focuses on HIV disparities among transfeminine persons, whereas non-HIV STIs (e.g., chlamydia) and transmasculine and nonbinary persons are overlooked. Thus, we examined barriers and facilitators to uptake of non-HIV STI testing among TGD persons, inclusive of transmasculine, transfeminine, and nonbinary persons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This community-based explanatory sequential mixed-methods study utilized secondary quantitative data collected 2018-2019 from the Michigan Trans Health Survey (n = 528) analyzed utilizing logistic regression to test associations between social ecological hypothesized factors and non-HIV STI testing. Primary qualitative focus group data collected 2022 (n = 36 TGD participants) were analyzed using a reflexive thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In multivariable analyses adjusting for age and race, reporting a very/somewhat inclusive primary care provider and ever experiencing sexual violence were statistically significantly positively associated with testing. Five themes were identified that illustrated the complexity of the testing process: 1) The \"why\" motivating testing; 2) \"I've been vocal\": The impact of individual agency on TGD peoples' testing practices; 3) \"It's a big ordeal\": Running the gauntlet of testing; 4) \"Doesn't give me a hassle\": Gratitude for bare minimum dignity when accessing care; and, 5) \"Open, honest, and transparent\": Increased testing access due to collaborative, judgment-free, and trustworthy patient-provider relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings inform future interventions to increase STI testing among TGD populations, such as enhanced trauma-informed, intersectional, and gender-affirming STI testing, across urgent care, sexual and reproductive healthcare, and primary care. Findings call for systems-level change to promote such care to increase STI testing and advance health equity among TGD populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46855,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sexual Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sexual Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2025.2536252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) persons are disproportionately affected by sexually transmitted infection (STI) inequities. Research predominantly focuses on HIV disparities among transfeminine persons, whereas non-HIV STIs (e.g., chlamydia) and transmasculine and nonbinary persons are overlooked. Thus, we examined barriers and facilitators to uptake of non-HIV STI testing among TGD persons, inclusive of transmasculine, transfeminine, and nonbinary persons.

Methods: This community-based explanatory sequential mixed-methods study utilized secondary quantitative data collected 2018-2019 from the Michigan Trans Health Survey (n = 528) analyzed utilizing logistic regression to test associations between social ecological hypothesized factors and non-HIV STI testing. Primary qualitative focus group data collected 2022 (n = 36 TGD participants) were analyzed using a reflexive thematic approach.

Results: In multivariable analyses adjusting for age and race, reporting a very/somewhat inclusive primary care provider and ever experiencing sexual violence were statistically significantly positively associated with testing. Five themes were identified that illustrated the complexity of the testing process: 1) The "why" motivating testing; 2) "I've been vocal": The impact of individual agency on TGD peoples' testing practices; 3) "It's a big ordeal": Running the gauntlet of testing; 4) "Doesn't give me a hassle": Gratitude for bare minimum dignity when accessing care; and, 5) "Open, honest, and transparent": Increased testing access due to collaborative, judgment-free, and trustworthy patient-provider relationships.

Conclusions: Findings inform future interventions to increase STI testing among TGD populations, such as enhanced trauma-informed, intersectional, and gender-affirming STI testing, across urgent care, sexual and reproductive healthcare, and primary care. Findings call for systems-level change to promote such care to increase STI testing and advance health equity among TGD populations.

“这是一个巨大的考验”:跨性别和性别多元化人群非hiv性传播感染检测经历的混合方法研究。
目的:跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)的人不成比例地受到性传播感染(STI)不平等的影响。研究主要集中在跨性别者之间的艾滋病毒差异,而非艾滋病毒性传播感染(如衣原体)和跨性别者和非二元性别者被忽视。因此,我们研究了TGD人群(包括跨男性、跨女性和非二元性别人群)接受非hiv性传播感染检测的障碍和促进因素。方法:这项以社区为基础的解释顺序混合方法研究利用2018-2019年从密歇根跨健康调查(n = 528)收集的二次定量数据,利用逻辑回归分析社会生态假设因素与非艾滋病毒性传播感染检测之间的关联。使用反身性主题方法分析了收集的2022年(n = 36 TGD参与者)的主要定性焦点小组数据。结果:在调整年龄和种族的多变量分析中,报告一个非常/有些包容性的初级保健提供者和曾经经历过性暴力在统计上与测试显著正相关。确定了五个主题,说明了测试过程的复杂性:1)“为什么”激励测试;2)“我一直在发声”:个体机构对TGD人员测试实践的影响;3)“这是一场巨大的考验”:经受测试的考验;4)“不给我添麻烦”:感谢在获得护理时最低限度的尊严;5)“开放、诚实和透明”:由于协作、无判断和值得信赖的医患关系,增加了检测的可及性。结论:研究结果为未来的干预措施提供了信息,以增加TGD人群中的性传播感染检测,例如在紧急护理、性和生殖保健以及初级保健中加强创伤知情、交叉和性别确认性传播感染检测。研究结果呼吁进行系统层面的变革,以促进此类护理,以增加性传播感染检测并促进TGD人群的卫生公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health, the International Journal of Sexual Health promotes sexual health as a state of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being through a positive approach to sexuality and sexual rights. The journal publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers, editorials, and reviews, using quantitative and qualitative methods, descriptive and critical analysis, instrument development, surveys, and case studies to examine the essential elements of this broad concept. Leading experts from around the world present original work that covers a variety of disciplines, including sexology, biology, medicine, psychology, sociology, anthropology, history, and religion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信