The Role of Diabetes Distress and Self-Efficacy as Mediators of Barriers to Diabetes Self-Management in Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Q3 Medicine
Diabetes Spectrum Pub Date : 2025-06-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2337/ds24-0087
Ngozi D Nnoli, John Sideris, Pey-Jiuan Lee, Steven Fox, Jennifer K Raymond, Elizabeth A Pyatak
{"title":"The Role of Diabetes Distress and Self-Efficacy as Mediators of Barriers to Diabetes Self-Management in Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Ngozi D Nnoli, John Sideris, Pey-Jiuan Lee, Steven Fox, Jennifer K Raymond, Elizabeth A Pyatak","doi":"10.2337/ds24-0087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined how structural and contextual barriers, including social needs and gender, influence diabetes self-management (DSM) through psychosocial pathways, particularly diabetes distress (DD) and self-efficacy (SE). Although these barriers are well documented, their interactions with psychosocial factors remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We analyzed cross-sectional baseline data from the REAL-T (Resilient, Empowered, Active Living-Telehealth) study (<i>n</i> = 198). Using hierarchical regression, we assessed factors influencing DSM. Structural predictors included unmet social needs and limited insulin access; contextual predictors included gender and ethnicity. Hypothesized mediators were the scores on the Diabetes Distress Scale, the Diabetes Empowerment Scale, and the Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life. After identifying significant predictors and potential mediators through hierarchical multivariate regression analysis, separate path models were tested for each hypothesized mediator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unmet social needs, as well as female and nonconforming genders, were found likely to increase DSM challenges. All selected predictors became nonsignificant when accounting for all psychosocial variables. DD mediated all tested relationships, and SE partially mediated the relationship between unmet social needs and DSM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed model suggests the need for targeted interventions addressing psychosocial pathways, particularly DD and SE, to mitigate the downstream effects of structural barriers to DSM. Inclusive gender-specific care models and systemic reforms to reduce social inequities are crucial for improving DSM outcomes and overall well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":39737,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Spectrum","volume":"38 3","pages":"335-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/ds24-0087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examined how structural and contextual barriers, including social needs and gender, influence diabetes self-management (DSM) through psychosocial pathways, particularly diabetes distress (DD) and self-efficacy (SE). Although these barriers are well documented, their interactions with psychosocial factors remain underexplored.

Research design and methods: We analyzed cross-sectional baseline data from the REAL-T (Resilient, Empowered, Active Living-Telehealth) study (n = 198). Using hierarchical regression, we assessed factors influencing DSM. Structural predictors included unmet social needs and limited insulin access; contextual predictors included gender and ethnicity. Hypothesized mediators were the scores on the Diabetes Distress Scale, the Diabetes Empowerment Scale, and the Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life. After identifying significant predictors and potential mediators through hierarchical multivariate regression analysis, separate path models were tested for each hypothesized mediator.

Results: Unmet social needs, as well as female and nonconforming genders, were found likely to increase DSM challenges. All selected predictors became nonsignificant when accounting for all psychosocial variables. DD mediated all tested relationships, and SE partially mediated the relationship between unmet social needs and DSM.

Conclusion: The proposed model suggests the need for targeted interventions addressing psychosocial pathways, particularly DD and SE, to mitigate the downstream effects of structural barriers to DSM. Inclusive gender-specific care models and systemic reforms to reduce social inequities are crucial for improving DSM outcomes and overall well-being.

一项横断面研究:糖尿病困扰和自我效能作为1型糖尿病青年糖尿病自我管理障碍的中介
目的:本研究探讨了结构和背景障碍,包括社会需求和性别,如何通过社会心理途径影响糖尿病自我管理(DSM),特别是糖尿病痛苦(DD)和自我效能(SE)。尽管这些障碍有充分的文献记载,但它们与社会心理因素的相互作用仍未得到充分探讨。研究设计和方法:我们分析了REAL-T(弹性、赋权、积极生活-远程医疗)研究的横断面基线数据(n = 198)。采用层次回归,我们评估了影响DSM的因素。结构性预测因素包括未满足的社会需求和有限的胰岛素获取;背景预测因素包括性别和种族。假设的中介是糖尿病痛苦量表、糖尿病授权量表和糖尿病依赖生活质量审计的分数。在通过分层多元回归分析确定了显著的预测因子和潜在的中介因子后,对每个假设的中介因子进行了单独的路径模型测试。结果:未满足的社会需求,以及女性和不符合性别,可能会增加DSM的挑战。当考虑到所有社会心理变量时,所有选定的预测因子都变得不显著。DD在所有被测关系中起中介作用,SE在未满足的社会需求与DSM之间起部分中介作用。结论:提出的模型表明,需要针对心理社会途径,特别是DD和SE进行有针对性的干预,以减轻结构性障碍对DSM的下游影响。包容性的针对性别的护理模式和旨在减少社会不平等的系统性改革对于改善DSM结果和整体福祉至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Spectrum
Diabetes Spectrum Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The mission of Diabetes Spectrum: From Research to Practice is to assist health care professionals in the development of strategies to individualize treatment and diabetes self-management education for improved quality of life and diabetes control. These goals are achieved by presenting review as well as original, peer-reviewed articles on topics in clinical diabetes management, professional and patient education, nutrition, behavioral science and counseling, educational program development, and advocacy. In each issue, the FROM RESEARCH TO PRACTICE section explores, in depth, a diabetes care topic and provides practical application of current research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信