Identifying phenotypes in OSA patients with an indication for CPAP treatment using clinical data and experienced symptom severity.

IF 2.9 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Marion Teunissen, Pascal Wielders, Catherine Bolman
{"title":"Identifying phenotypes in OSA patients with an indication for CPAP treatment using clinical data and experienced symptom severity.","authors":"Marion Teunissen, Pascal Wielders, Catherine Bolman","doi":"10.1186/s41687-025-00915-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the group of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is very heterogeneous, OSA's severity is mainly expressed by an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), which does not correlate well with the experienced symptom severity. As a first step to develop a more personalized approach for treatment, the purpose of the current study was to create, through cluster analysis, meaningful OSA phenotypes linked to the Patient Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through a survey, new OSA patients indicated for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment completed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the PRAQ to rate their experienced symptom severity. Clinical data, such as the AHI and comorbidity, were assessed from the patient file. Cluster analysis has been performed to derive OSA phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the AHI, comorbidity and experienced symptom severity data of 151 patients, a two-step cluster analysis revealed five OSA phenotypes: \"no comorbidity\", \"hypertension\", \"high symptom severity\", \"low symptom severity\" and \"unclassified\". The five phenotypes mainly differ in the experienced level of fatigue, partner-observed snoring severity and symptoms related to performing regular daily activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Not only the AHI, but also comorbidity and subjective symptoms should be taken into consideration when diagnosing OSA, assessing its severity and in providing a more patient-oriented treatment, including deciding about CPAP treatment. Not the often-used ESS but the modified PRAQ scales provide relevant information to assess experienced symptom severity. In addition, for an improved prognostication, we propose an evaluation of the CPAP treatment effectiveness for the five reported OSA phenotypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":"9 1","pages":"104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00915-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although the group of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is very heterogeneous, OSA's severity is mainly expressed by an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), which does not correlate well with the experienced symptom severity. As a first step to develop a more personalized approach for treatment, the purpose of the current study was to create, through cluster analysis, meaningful OSA phenotypes linked to the Patient Reported Apnea Questionnaire (PRAQ).

Methods: Through a survey, new OSA patients indicated for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment completed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the PRAQ to rate their experienced symptom severity. Clinical data, such as the AHI and comorbidity, were assessed from the patient file. Cluster analysis has been performed to derive OSA phenotypes.

Results: Based on the AHI, comorbidity and experienced symptom severity data of 151 patients, a two-step cluster analysis revealed five OSA phenotypes: "no comorbidity", "hypertension", "high symptom severity", "low symptom severity" and "unclassified". The five phenotypes mainly differ in the experienced level of fatigue, partner-observed snoring severity and symptoms related to performing regular daily activities.

Conclusion: Not only the AHI, but also comorbidity and subjective symptoms should be taken into consideration when diagnosing OSA, assessing its severity and in providing a more patient-oriented treatment, including deciding about CPAP treatment. Not the often-used ESS but the modified PRAQ scales provide relevant information to assess experienced symptom severity. In addition, for an improved prognostication, we propose an evaluation of the CPAP treatment effectiveness for the five reported OSA phenotypes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用临床数据和经历过的症状严重程度来识别具有CPAP治疗指征的OSA患者的表型。
背景:虽然阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者的群体非常异质性,但OSA的严重程度主要通过呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)来表达,AHI与所经历的症状严重程度相关性不强。作为开发更个性化治疗方法的第一步,本研究的目的是通过聚类分析,创建与患者报告的呼吸暂停问卷(PRAQ)相关的有意义的OSA表型。方法:通过问卷调查,对新入组接受持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗的OSA患者进行Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)和PRAQ评分,评估其经历的症状严重程度。临床数据,如AHI和合并症,从患者档案中评估。已进行聚类分析以获得OSA表型。结果:根据151例患者的AHI、合并症和经历过的症状严重程度数据,两步聚类分析得出5种OSA表型:“无合并症”、“高血压”、“高症状严重程度”、“低症状严重程度”和“未分类”。这五种表型的差异主要体现在体验到的疲劳程度、伴侣观察到的打鼾严重程度以及与进行常规日常活动相关的症状。结论:在诊断OSA、评估其严重程度、提供更以患者为导向的治疗时,包括决定是否进行CPAP治疗时,不仅要考虑AHI,还要考虑合并症和主观症状。不是常用的ESS,而是修改后的PRAQ量表提供了评估经验症状严重程度的相关信息。此外,为了改善预后,我们建议评估CPAP对五种已报道的OSA表型的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信