Assessing the Time for Living and Caring (TLC) Study: Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study of a Web-Based Caregiver Intervention to Improve Respite.

IF 4.8 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2025-08-18 DOI:10.2196/71792
Amber D Thompson, Alexandra L Terrill, Michael Caserta, Bob Wong, Eli Iacob, Catharine Sparks, Louisa Stark, Rebecca L Utz
{"title":"Assessing the Time for Living and Caring (TLC) Study: Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study of a Web-Based Caregiver Intervention to Improve Respite.","authors":"Amber D Thompson, Alexandra L Terrill, Michael Caserta, Bob Wong, Eli Iacob, Catharine Sparks, Louisa Stark, Rebecca L Utz","doi":"10.2196/71792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interventions that are self-administered and delivered online are increasingly being seen as a flexible way to support family caregivers. Intervention research should prioritize the measurement of feasibility throughout all of the stages of intervention development and evaluation to provide the essential feedback loop needed for the iterative development and refinement process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We describe the methodology and data used to assess the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of the Time for Living and Caring (TLC) intervention, a technology-delivered intervention (app) for dementia caregivers to improve respite time use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The feasibility analysis is theoretically guided by a multidimensional definition of feasibility and uses a mixed-methods research design. Stakeholder feedback collected via focus groups during intervention development (n=15), self-reported surveys from participants enrolled in the pilot trial of the intervention (n=163), surveys of a nationwide sample of respite providers (n=57), and end-user statistics, captured passively by Google Analytics from those using the app, were used in the feasibility analysis of the TLC intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TLC study used an appropriate design and data collection procedures, along with acceptable recruitment capability. Out of 5 intervention features, 4 received favorable ratings (range of 82%-99%) by intervention participants and respite providers, which, when combined with open-ended recommendations for improvements, indicate a high degree of usability. Acceptability was measured through appraisal of the intervention experience (135/159, 85% positive), potential future use (127/163, 78%), willingness to recommend (148/163, 91%), and perceived benefit (135/163, 83%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Taken together, the data suggest that the TLC app is a promising intervention that could be implemented as an on-demand resource for respite-using caregivers, irrespective of where they are located or when they choose to access it. Additionally, this paper provides a blueprint for systematically evaluating multiple dimensions of feasibility, using various forms of mixed-methods data collected during intervention development and pilot testing of an intervention, which should help streamline the eventual implementation of effective interventions in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"8 ","pages":"e71792"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/71792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interventions that are self-administered and delivered online are increasingly being seen as a flexible way to support family caregivers. Intervention research should prioritize the measurement of feasibility throughout all of the stages of intervention development and evaluation to provide the essential feedback loop needed for the iterative development and refinement process.

Objective: We describe the methodology and data used to assess the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of the Time for Living and Caring (TLC) intervention, a technology-delivered intervention (app) for dementia caregivers to improve respite time use.

Methods: The feasibility analysis is theoretically guided by a multidimensional definition of feasibility and uses a mixed-methods research design. Stakeholder feedback collected via focus groups during intervention development (n=15), self-reported surveys from participants enrolled in the pilot trial of the intervention (n=163), surveys of a nationwide sample of respite providers (n=57), and end-user statistics, captured passively by Google Analytics from those using the app, were used in the feasibility analysis of the TLC intervention.

Results: The TLC study used an appropriate design and data collection procedures, along with acceptable recruitment capability. Out of 5 intervention features, 4 received favorable ratings (range of 82%-99%) by intervention participants and respite providers, which, when combined with open-ended recommendations for improvements, indicate a high degree of usability. Acceptability was measured through appraisal of the intervention experience (135/159, 85% positive), potential future use (127/163, 78%), willingness to recommend (148/163, 91%), and perceived benefit (135/163, 83%).

Conclusions: Taken together, the data suggest that the TLC app is a promising intervention that could be implemented as an on-demand resource for respite-using caregivers, irrespective of where they are located or when they choose to access it. Additionally, this paper provides a blueprint for systematically evaluating multiple dimensions of feasibility, using various forms of mixed-methods data collected during intervention development and pilot testing of an intervention, which should help streamline the eventual implementation of effective interventions in real-world settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估生活和护理时间(TLC)研究:基于网络的护理人员干预改善喘息的混合方法可行性研究。
背景:自我管理和在线提供的干预措施越来越被视为支持家庭照顾者的一种灵活方式。干预研究应优先考虑在干预开发和评估的所有阶段测量可行性,以提供迭代开发和改进过程所需的基本反馈回路。目的:我们描述了用于评估生活和护理时间(TLC)干预的可行性、可用性和可接受性的方法和数据,TLC是一种技术交付的干预(app),用于痴呆症护理人员改善喘息时间的使用。方法:可行性分析以多维度的可行性定义为理论指导,采用混合方法研究设计。通过干预开发过程中的焦点小组收集的利益相关者反馈(n=15),干预试点试验参与者的自我报告调查(n=163),全国范围内的临时提供者样本调查(n=57),以及谷歌Analytics从使用该应用程序的人那里被动获取的最终用户统计数据,用于TLC干预的可行性分析。结果:薄层色谱研究采用了适当的设计和数据收集程序,以及可接受的招募能力。在5个干预功能中,4个获得了干预参与者和喘息提供者的好评(范围为82%-99%),当与开放式改进建议相结合时,表明高度可用性。通过评估干预体验(135/159,85%为阳性)、未来潜在使用(127/163,78%)、推荐意愿(148/163,91%)和感知效益(135/163,83%)来衡量可接受性。结论:综上所述,数据表明,TLC应用程序是一种很有前途的干预措施,可以作为一种按需资源实施,用于使用喘息的护理人员,无论他们位于何处或何时选择访问它。此外,本文还提供了一个蓝图,利用在干预措施开发和干预措施试点测试期间收集的各种形式的混合方法数据,系统地评估多个维度的可行性,这将有助于简化在现实环境中有效干预措施的最终实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信