ASSESSING THE UTILITY OF THE HEART SCORE IN THE ERA OF HIGH-SENSITIVITY TROPONIN.

Q3 Medicine
Ethan F Kramer, Jonathan Van Name, Rogina Rezk, Nicolas J Abchee, Emily P Meisel, Michelle Waples, Reece Frechette, Brandon R Allen, Mohammed Ruzieh
{"title":"ASSESSING THE UTILITY OF THE HEART SCORE IN THE ERA OF HIGH-SENSITIVITY TROPONIN.","authors":"Ethan F Kramer, Jonathan Van Name, Rogina Rezk, Nicolas J Abchee, Emily P Meisel, Michelle Waples, Reece Frechette, Brandon R Allen, Mohammed Ruzieh","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is uncertainty in the clinical utility of the HEART score, given its incorporation of an older generation of troponin assay. We sought to determine whether high-sensitivity troponin I (Hs-TnI) alone can effectively stratify cardiovascular risk in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with moderate or high HEART score by analyzing the management and outcomes of adults presenting to our ED with chest pain, moderate or high HEART score, and Hs-TnI below the 99th percentile. For this population, we calculated the negative predictive value (NPV) of Hs-TnI in ruling out a major adverse cardiac event (MACE; defined as myocardial infarction or death from a cardiovascular or unknown cause) at 30 days. The average HEART score was 5.1, and 1224 patients (92.0%) had a moderate HEART score (4-6) and 107 patients (8.0%) had a high HEART score (7+). The average age of patients was 59.0 years and 52.7% were women. The incidence of 30-day MACE was 0.2%. Overall, in this cohort of patients with moderate or high HEART score, Hs-TnI below the 99th percentile had an NPV of 99.8% (95% CI: 99.6% - 100.0%) in ruling out MACE at 30 days. Given the low event rate, a moderate or high HEART score should not be the sole determinant for admission when Hs-Tnl is not elevated.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is uncertainty in the clinical utility of the HEART score, given its incorporation of an older generation of troponin assay. We sought to determine whether high-sensitivity troponin I (Hs-TnI) alone can effectively stratify cardiovascular risk in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with moderate or high HEART score by analyzing the management and outcomes of adults presenting to our ED with chest pain, moderate or high HEART score, and Hs-TnI below the 99th percentile. For this population, we calculated the negative predictive value (NPV) of Hs-TnI in ruling out a major adverse cardiac event (MACE; defined as myocardial infarction or death from a cardiovascular or unknown cause) at 30 days. The average HEART score was 5.1, and 1224 patients (92.0%) had a moderate HEART score (4-6) and 107 patients (8.0%) had a high HEART score (7+). The average age of patients was 59.0 years and 52.7% were women. The incidence of 30-day MACE was 0.2%. Overall, in this cohort of patients with moderate or high HEART score, Hs-TnI below the 99th percentile had an NPV of 99.8% (95% CI: 99.6% - 100.0%) in ruling out MACE at 30 days. Given the low event rate, a moderate or high HEART score should not be the sole determinant for admission when Hs-Tnl is not elevated.

评估高敏感性肌钙蛋白时代心脏评分的效用。
HEART评分的临床应用存在不确定性,因为它与老一代肌钙蛋白检测相结合。我们试图通过分析胸痛、中高HEART评分和Hs-TnI低于99百分位的急诊科(ED)成人患者的处理和结果,确定单独使用高敏感性肌钙蛋白I (Hs-TnI)是否可以有效地对中高HEART评分的急诊科(ED)患者进行心血管风险分层。对于这一人群,我们计算了30天Hs-TnI在排除主要不良心脏事件(MACE,定义为心肌梗死或心血管或未知原因导致的死亡)时的阴性预测值(NPV)。平均HEART评分为5.1分,1224例(92.0%)为中度HEART评分(4-6分),107例(8.0%)为高评分(7+)。患者平均年龄59.0岁,女性占52.7%。30天MACE发生率为0.2%。总体而言,在HEART评分中高的患者队列中,低于第99百分位的Hs-TnI在30天排除MACE的NPV为99.8% (95% CI: 99.6% - 100.0%)。鉴于低事件发生率,当Hs-Tnl未升高时,中等或较高的HEART评分不应成为入院的唯一决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Pathways in Cardiology
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Critical Pathways in Cardiology provides a single source for the diagnostic and therapeutic protocols in use at hospitals worldwide for patients with cardiac disorders. The Journal presents critical pathways for specific diagnoses—complete with evidence-based rationales—and also publishes studies of these protocols" effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信