Impact of transversus abdominis plane block on length of stay and postoperative opioid use in anterior lumbar interbody fusions.

IF 2.5 Q3 Medicine
North American Spine Society Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-18 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100771
Katherine Drexelius, Steven Baltic, Kennedy Gachigi, Caleb Lifsey, Rebecca Kelso, P Bradley Segebarth
{"title":"Impact of transversus abdominis plane block on length of stay and postoperative opioid use in anterior lumbar interbody fusions.","authors":"Katherine Drexelius, Steven Baltic, Kennedy Gachigi, Caleb Lifsey, Rebecca Kelso, P Bradley Segebarth","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is an increasingly common surgical procedure for a variety of spinal pathologies. As both opioid use and healthcare costs remain major national healthcare crises, it is crucial to understand methods of effective pain management in spine surgery, including regional anesthesia. While transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are also commonly performed for anterior spinal surgery, literature evaluating outcomes after TAP blocks for ALIF patients is sparse. This retrospective cohort study aims to determine the effect of TAP blocks on perioperative opioid use and hospital length of stay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review was performed for patients 18 years or older undergoing 1- or 2-level ALIF with or without posterior percutaneous instrumented fusion. Baseline demographics, surgical details, length of stay (LOS), and data on inpatient opioid use (converted to morphine milliequivalents, MME) was collected. Total MME and MME stratified by postoperative day (POD) was collected. Bivariable and multivariable regression models were used to analyze the relationship of TAP blocks with LOS and narcotic use postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 295 patients were included, with 102 (34.6%) undergoing TAP block and 193 (65.4%) patients without TAP block. There were no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics. Use of a TAP block had no statistically significant effect on LOS, and bivariable analysis revealed no effect when groups were analyzed by sex, age, BMI, preoperative opioid use, or number of levels fused. TAP block patients received significantly more MME on POD 0 and on combined POD 1 and 2 than those without a TAP block. Bivariable analysis did not reveal any subgroup who benefitted from a TAP block.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With the largest patient cohort reported to date, we found no statistically significant improvements in length of stay or short-term postoperative opioid usage when patients received TAP blocks for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":"23 ","pages":"100771"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is an increasingly common surgical procedure for a variety of spinal pathologies. As both opioid use and healthcare costs remain major national healthcare crises, it is crucial to understand methods of effective pain management in spine surgery, including regional anesthesia. While transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are also commonly performed for anterior spinal surgery, literature evaluating outcomes after TAP blocks for ALIF patients is sparse. This retrospective cohort study aims to determine the effect of TAP blocks on perioperative opioid use and hospital length of stay.

Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed for patients 18 years or older undergoing 1- or 2-level ALIF with or without posterior percutaneous instrumented fusion. Baseline demographics, surgical details, length of stay (LOS), and data on inpatient opioid use (converted to morphine milliequivalents, MME) was collected. Total MME and MME stratified by postoperative day (POD) was collected. Bivariable and multivariable regression models were used to analyze the relationship of TAP blocks with LOS and narcotic use postoperatively.

Results: About 295 patients were included, with 102 (34.6%) undergoing TAP block and 193 (65.4%) patients without TAP block. There were no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics. Use of a TAP block had no statistically significant effect on LOS, and bivariable analysis revealed no effect when groups were analyzed by sex, age, BMI, preoperative opioid use, or number of levels fused. TAP block patients received significantly more MME on POD 0 and on combined POD 1 and 2 than those without a TAP block. Bivariable analysis did not reveal any subgroup who benefitted from a TAP block.

Conclusions: With the largest patient cohort reported to date, we found no statistically significant improvements in length of stay or short-term postoperative opioid usage when patients received TAP blocks for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

经腹平面阻滞对腰椎前路椎体间融合术住院时间和术后阿片类药物使用的影响。
背景:腰椎前路椎体间融合术(ALIF)是一种越来越常见的外科手术,用于治疗各种脊柱病变。由于阿片类药物的使用和医疗费用仍然是主要的国家医疗危机,了解脊柱手术中有效的疼痛管理方法,包括区域麻醉,是至关重要的。虽然腹横截面(TAP)阻滞也常用于脊柱前路手术,但评估ALIF患者TAP阻滞后疗效的文献很少。本回顾性队列研究旨在确定TAP阻滞对围手术期阿片类药物使用和住院时间的影响。方法:回顾性回顾18岁及以上接受1或2节段ALIF伴或不伴后路经皮内固定融合术的患者。收集基线人口统计、手术细节、住院时间(LOS)和住院阿片类药物使用数据(转换为吗啡毫当量,MME)。收集总MME和按术后天数(POD)分层的MME。采用双变量和多变量回归模型分析TAP阻滞与术后LOS和麻醉使用的关系。结果:共纳入295例患者,其中102例(34.6%)接受TAP阻滞,193例(65.4%)未接受TAP阻滞。两组患者的基线特征无显著差异。TAP阻滞的使用对LOS没有统计学上的显著影响,双变量分析显示,当按性别、年龄、BMI、术前阿片类药物使用或融合水平数量进行分组分析时,没有影响。与没有TAP阻断的患者相比,TAP阻断患者在POD 0和联合POD 1和2上接受了更多的MME。双变量分析未显示任何亚组受益于TAP阻断。结论:在迄今为止报道的最大的患者队列中,我们发现当患者接受前路腰椎椎体间融合术的TAP阻滞时,在住院时间或术后短期阿片类药物使用方面没有统计学上显著的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信