Cost-effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis after successful thrombectomy.

IF 1.6 Q2 SURGERY
BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies Pub Date : 2025-08-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000372
Bart Jeroen Emmer, Victor Durieux, Johannes Kaesmacher, Charles B L M Majoie, Albert J Yoo, Arturo Renú, Thomas Barthe, Anne-Laure Bocquet, Ángel Chamorro
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis after successful thrombectomy.","authors":"Bart Jeroen Emmer, Victor Durieux, Johannes Kaesmacher, Charles B L M Majoie, Albert J Yoo, Arturo Renú, Thomas Barthe, Anne-Laure Bocquet, Ángel Chamorro","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To study the cost-effectiveness of additional intra-arterial thrombolysis (IA lysis) after successful recanalization with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cost-effectiveness model was used to estimate both direct medical costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in six European countries (Spain, the Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom, France, Germany) and the USA.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The model was based on published data from those countries on health economics.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Cost of procedure as well as acute, mid-term and long-term care costs were estimated based on expected modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores as reported in the Chemical Optimization of Cerebral Embolectomy (CHOICE) trial, which reported improved neurological outcomes after adjunctive IA lysis following EVT.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>QALYs in the model were calculated by mapping mRS outcomes from the CHOICE trial to EQ-5D utility values from a validated poststroke cohort, projecting these over a 20-year lifetime horizon with 3% annual discounting, assuming health state transitions only after recurrent stroke (always to a worse mRS) and no recurrent stroke risk in the first 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IA lysis was found to be a cost-effective option in seven different countries (Spain, the Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and the USA). We found an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ranging from US$-2350 per QALY gained in Germany to US$9628 per QALY gained in the USA. A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed 90% acceptability of IA lysis at the willingness to pay varying between US$10 000 and US$45 000 depending on the country.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IA lysis after successful EVT was cost-efficient after reperfusion in the seven countries studied. The early termination, small sample and limited power of the CHOICE trial reduce generalizability of our results. Larger trials are needed to confirm cost-effectiveness of IA lysis after successful EVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":"7 1","pages":"e000372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To study the cost-effectiveness of additional intra-arterial thrombolysis (IA lysis) after successful recanalization with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).

Design: A cost-effectiveness model was used to estimate both direct medical costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in six European countries (Spain, the Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom, France, Germany) and the USA.

Setting: The model was based on published data from those countries on health economics.

Participants: Cost of procedure as well as acute, mid-term and long-term care costs were estimated based on expected modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores as reported in the Chemical Optimization of Cerebral Embolectomy (CHOICE) trial, which reported improved neurological outcomes after adjunctive IA lysis following EVT.

Main outcome measures: QALYs in the model were calculated by mapping mRS outcomes from the CHOICE trial to EQ-5D utility values from a validated poststroke cohort, projecting these over a 20-year lifetime horizon with 3% annual discounting, assuming health state transitions only after recurrent stroke (always to a worse mRS) and no recurrent stroke risk in the first 90 days.

Results: IA lysis was found to be a cost-effective option in seven different countries (Spain, the Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and the USA). We found an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ranging from US$-2350 per QALY gained in Germany to US$9628 per QALY gained in the USA. A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed 90% acceptability of IA lysis at the willingness to pay varying between US$10 000 and US$45 000 depending on the country.

Conclusions: IA lysis after successful EVT was cost-efficient after reperfusion in the seven countries studied. The early termination, small sample and limited power of the CHOICE trial reduce generalizability of our results. Larger trials are needed to confirm cost-effectiveness of IA lysis after successful EVT.

成功取栓后动脉溶栓的成本-效果。
目的:研究血管内取栓(EVT)再通成功后动脉内溶栓(IA lysis)的成本-效果。设计:在六个欧洲国家(西班牙、荷兰、意大利、英国、法国、德国)和美国,使用成本-效果模型来估计获得的直接医疗费用和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。背景:该模型基于来自这些国家的卫生经济学公开数据。参与者:手术费用以及急性、中期和长期护理费用是根据预期的修正兰金量表(mRS)评分进行估计的,该评分在脑栓塞化学优化(CHOICE)试验中报道,该试验报告了EVT后辅助IA溶解后神经系统预后的改善。主要结局指标:模型中的QALYs通过将CHOICE试验的mRS结果与卒中后验证队列的EQ-5D效用值进行映射来计算,以3%的年折现率预测20年的生命周期,假设健康状态仅在卒中复发后发生转变(总是向更差的mRS转变),并且在前90天内没有卒中复发风险。结果:在七个不同的国家(西班牙、荷兰、意大利、英国、法国、德国和美国),发现IA裂解是一种具有成本效益的选择。我们发现,增量成本效益比的范围从德国获得的每质量aly -2350美元到美国获得的每质量aly 9628美元不等。成本效益可接受性曲线显示,在支付意愿在1万美元至4.5万美元之间的情况下,90%的IA裂解可接受性取决于国家。结论:在研究的七个国家中,EVT成功后再灌注IA溶解具有成本效益。CHOICE试验的早期终止、小样本和有限的威力降低了我们研究结果的普遍性。在EVT成功后,需要更大规模的试验来确认IA裂解的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信