[Current status of pre-hospital and in-hospital emergency medical information connectivity of 13 provincial-level administrative regions in China: a multi-center cross-sectional survey].

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the current status of pre-hospital and in-hospital emergency medical information connectivity in China and provide evidence for optimizing the emergency medical system.

Methods: A multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted using a multi-level convenience sampling method to select provincial-level administrative regions and their corresponding capital cities, prefectural cities, and county-level emergency medical institutions. The questionnaire included basic information about respondents, the institutions, the current status of pre-hospital and in-hospital emergency information connectivity, and the satisfaction with the connectivity. The questionnaire has undergone reliability testing and split-half reliability testing, supplemented by semi-structured interviews. Data collection was carried out from January to May 2024, with one responsible person from each institution completing the questionnaire. Multiple Logistic regression analysis to investigated the relevant factors of pre-hospital and in-hospital information connectivity.

Results: A total of 225 questionnaires were distributed, and 199 valid responses were collected, with a response rate of 88.4%. Participants were from 199 emergency medical institutions across 13 provincial-level administrative regions. Of the institutions, 112 (56.3%) could achieve pre-hospital and in-hospital information connectivity. The proportion of pre-hospital to in-hospital information connection between emergency institutions in different provinces varies (χ² = 39.398, P < 0.001), with Beijing and Zhejiang having the highest proportion of information connection (both at 100%), and Hainan having the lowest (11.8%). The proportion of information integration in county-level emergency institution was lower than that of provincial and municipal level emergency institutions [40.4% (19/47) vs. 61.7% (29/47), 61.0% (64/105), χ² = 6.304, P = 0.043]. Provinces with high per capita disposable income have a higher proportion of information connectivity than provinces with low per capita disposable income [77.3% (34/44) vs. 50.3% (78/155), χ² = 10.122, P = 0.001]. The information connection ratio of independent pre-hospital emergency centers was higher than that of hospital emergency departments/hospital records [74.6% (47/63) vs. 47.8% (65/136), χ² = 12.581, P < 0.001]. The proportion of information integration in advanced provinces with digital development was higher than that in other provinces [77.6% (38/49) vs. 49.3% (74/150), χ² = 11.849, P = 0.001]. Logistic regression analysis showed that the per capita disposable income of residents in the province was an independent risk factor for the information connection between pre-hospital and in-hospital emergency institutions [odds ratio (OR) = 3.21, 95% confidence interval was 1.56-6.62, P < 0.01]. 72.3% institutions used the information connection mode for less than 5 years. Telephone and WeChat were the main communication methods (83.0%), and 17.0% of emergency institutions use dedicated APP for communication. 52.7% of respondents were very or relatively satisfied with the information integration before and after the hospital. The main deficiencies in current information integration were insufficient, untimely, inaccurate communication and delayed feedback between pre-hospital and in-hospital information. Optimizing top-level design and improving network quality are the directions for improving the integration of pre-hospital and in-hospital information in the future.

Conclusions: Pre-hospital and in-hospital emergency information connectivity in some provinces in China remains underdeveloped, with significant regional and institutional disparities. Future efforts should focus on integrating digital technologies and strengthening grassroots-level connectivity systems.