Developing a Comprehensive Framework for Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Insights from a Systematic Review.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Christopher G Fawsitt, Elaine Gallagher, Alka Singh, Hannah Baker, Edward Kayongo, Howard Thom, Noman Paracha
{"title":"Developing a Comprehensive Framework for Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Insights from a Systematic Review.","authors":"Christopher G Fawsitt, Elaine Gallagher, Alka Singh, Hannah Baker, Edward Kayongo, Howard Thom, Noman Paracha","doi":"10.1007/s40273-025-01532-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) imposes a significant economic burden and necessitates more cost-effective treatment strategies. The variability among the components of published economic evaluation models leads to methodological inconsistencies, underscoring the need for an optimal framework to minimise unwarranted structural variation. This paper reviews existing economic evaluations, establishes a comprehensive framework and aims to support future economic evaluations and decision-making in mCSPC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to identify relevant economic evaluations in mCSPC. Health technology assessments (HTAs) by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and Canada's Drug Agency were reviewed to gather insights on critiques and limitations. On the basis of these findings, a comprehensive cost-effectiveness modelling framework was established. Furthermore, two additional SLRs were conducted to identify cost and resource utilisation inputs, as well as health state utility scores derived from published studies and HTA assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Markov models and partitioned survival models (PSMs) were commonly reported in literature and published HTA evaluations. Despite the strong precedence of PSMs, we propose an optimal framework for mCSPC utilising a semi-Markov structure. This approach offers increased flexibility, allowing transition rates from progressed states to depend on time since progression occurred. We also present key sources of cost and utility data identified in the SLR.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This work aligns with methodologies recommended by the Innovative Medicine Initiative (IMI) PIONEER external group and published studies. The optimal framework, including healthcare resource utilisation and utility data, consolidates existing modelling precedents in mCSPC and will assist the cost-effectiveness assessment of treatments for this condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":19807,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-025-01532-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) imposes a significant economic burden and necessitates more cost-effective treatment strategies. The variability among the components of published economic evaluation models leads to methodological inconsistencies, underscoring the need for an optimal framework to minimise unwarranted structural variation. This paper reviews existing economic evaluations, establishes a comprehensive framework and aims to support future economic evaluations and decision-making in mCSPC.

Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to identify relevant economic evaluations in mCSPC. Health technology assessments (HTAs) by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and Canada's Drug Agency were reviewed to gather insights on critiques and limitations. On the basis of these findings, a comprehensive cost-effectiveness modelling framework was established. Furthermore, two additional SLRs were conducted to identify cost and resource utilisation inputs, as well as health state utility scores derived from published studies and HTA assessments.

Results: Markov models and partitioned survival models (PSMs) were commonly reported in literature and published HTA evaluations. Despite the strong precedence of PSMs, we propose an optimal framework for mCSPC utilising a semi-Markov structure. This approach offers increased flexibility, allowing transition rates from progressed states to depend on time since progression occurred. We also present key sources of cost and utility data identified in the SLR.

Discussion: This work aligns with methodologies recommended by the Innovative Medicine Initiative (IMI) PIONEER external group and published studies. The optimal framework, including healthcare resource utilisation and utility data, consolidates existing modelling precedents in mCSPC and will assist the cost-effectiveness assessment of treatments for this condition.

开发转移性去势敏感前列腺癌成本-效果评估的综合框架:来自系统综述的见解。
背景和目的:转移性去势敏感前列腺癌(mCSPC)带来了巨大的经济负担,需要更具成本效益的治疗策略。已公布的经济评估模型的组成部分之间的可变性导致方法上的不一致,强调需要一个最佳框架来尽量减少不必要的结构变化。本文回顾了现有的经济评价,建立了综合框架,旨在为mCSPC未来的经济评价和决策提供支持。方法:通过系统的文献回顾(SLR)来确定mCSPC的相关经济评价。审查了国家卫生和保健卓越研究所和加拿大药品管理局的卫生技术评估(hta),以收集关于批评和局限性的见解。在这些发现的基础上,建立了一个全面的成本效益模型框架。此外,还进行了两个额外的slr,以确定成本和资源利用投入,以及从已发表的研究和HTA评估得出的健康状态效用分数。结果:马尔可夫模型和分区生存模型(psm)在文献和已发表的HTA评价中被广泛报道。尽管psm具有很强的优先性,但我们提出了利用半马尔可夫结构的mCSPC的最佳框架。这种方法提供了更大的灵活性,允许从进展状态的转换速率取决于进展发生后的时间。我们还介绍了SLR中确定的成本和效用数据的主要来源。讨论:这项工作与创新医学倡议(IMI)先锋外部小组和已发表的研究推荐的方法一致。最佳框架,包括医疗资源利用和效用数据,整合了mCSPC中现有的建模先例,并将有助于对这种情况的治疗进行成本效益评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PharmacoEconomics
PharmacoEconomics 医学-药学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics is the benchmark journal for peer-reviewed, authoritative and practical articles on the application of pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life assessment to optimum drug therapy and health outcomes. An invaluable source of applied pharmacoeconomic original research and educational material for the healthcare decision maker. PharmacoEconomics is dedicated to the clear communication of complex pharmacoeconomic issues related to patient care and drug utilization. PharmacoEconomics offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信