Prevalence and associated outcomes of right ventricular dysfunction in peripartum cardiomyopathy: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Matthew Aldo Wijayanto, Christopher Daniel Tristan, Graciella Angelica Lukas, Annisa Aghnia Rahma, Muhana Fawwazy Ilyas, Risalina Myrtha, Hary Sakti Muliawan, Bambang Budi Siswanto
{"title":"Prevalence and associated outcomes of right ventricular dysfunction in peripartum cardiomyopathy: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.","authors":"Matthew Aldo Wijayanto, Christopher Daniel Tristan, Graciella Angelica Lukas, Annisa Aghnia Rahma, Muhana Fawwazy Ilyas, Risalina Myrtha, Hary Sakti Muliawan, Bambang Budi Siswanto","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2025-003253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent studies have highlighted the presence of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in a substantial proportion of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM), with evidence suggesting that RVD is associated with worse outcomes and a lower likelihood of left ventricular (LV) recovery. This study aims to comprehensively assess the pooled prevalence, associated outcomes and LV recovery of RVD in PPCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Scopus and ScienceDirect were used to identify relevant literature prior to 19 January 2025. Statistical analysis was conducted using RStudio. All meta-analyses were performed using random effects, with subsequent subgroup analysis and univariate meta-regression conducted for prevalence meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled prevalence of RVD in PPCM was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.36 to 0.59; I² 95.3%) across 14 studies (1385 patients). RVD was diagnosed using multimodality imaging (e.g., echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging), with diagnostic criteria defined in the original studies. Meta-regression showed a decreasing trend in RVD prevalence in more recent publications (p=0.03), with variability based on study design, location and diagnostic modality on subgroup analysis. Patients with RVD had a significantly higher risk of composite adverse outcomes (including death, LV assist device implantation, heart transplantation or the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; hazard ratio 2.71; 95% CI 1.08 to 6.84; p=0.04; three studies) and heart transplantation (risk ratio (RR) 4.71; 95% CI 1.82 to 12.20; p<0.01; two studies). Additionally, RVD was associated with a lower baseline LV ejection fraction (mean difference -10.94; 95% CI -14.80 to -7.08; p<0.01; six studies) and an increased risk of unrecovered LV function (RR 1.62; 95% CI 1.25 to 2.11; p<0.01; four studies).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RVD occurs in nearly half of patients with PPCM and is associated with a poor prognosis. It may represent a crucial marker for prognostic stratification, particularly for the risk of unrecovered LV function.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42025626739.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359473/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Recent studies have highlighted the presence of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in a substantial proportion of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM), with evidence suggesting that RVD is associated with worse outcomes and a lower likelihood of left ventricular (LV) recovery. This study aims to comprehensively assess the pooled prevalence, associated outcomes and LV recovery of RVD in PPCM.
Methods: PubMed, Scopus and ScienceDirect were used to identify relevant literature prior to 19 January 2025. Statistical analysis was conducted using RStudio. All meta-analyses were performed using random effects, with subsequent subgroup analysis and univariate meta-regression conducted for prevalence meta-analysis.
Results: The pooled prevalence of RVD in PPCM was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.36 to 0.59; I² 95.3%) across 14 studies (1385 patients). RVD was diagnosed using multimodality imaging (e.g., echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging), with diagnostic criteria defined in the original studies. Meta-regression showed a decreasing trend in RVD prevalence in more recent publications (p=0.03), with variability based on study design, location and diagnostic modality on subgroup analysis. Patients with RVD had a significantly higher risk of composite adverse outcomes (including death, LV assist device implantation, heart transplantation or the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; hazard ratio 2.71; 95% CI 1.08 to 6.84; p=0.04; three studies) and heart transplantation (risk ratio (RR) 4.71; 95% CI 1.82 to 12.20; p<0.01; two studies). Additionally, RVD was associated with a lower baseline LV ejection fraction (mean difference -10.94; 95% CI -14.80 to -7.08; p<0.01; six studies) and an increased risk of unrecovered LV function (RR 1.62; 95% CI 1.25 to 2.11; p<0.01; four studies).
Conclusion: RVD occurs in nearly half of patients with PPCM and is associated with a poor prognosis. It may represent a crucial marker for prognostic stratification, particularly for the risk of unrecovered LV function.
期刊介绍:
Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.