Differences in the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction among physicians from Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: an international survey.
Mohamed H Omer, Anastasia Shchendrygina, Omar Ahmad, Clara Saldarriaga, Sydney Goldfeder de Gracia, Mosaad Alhussain, Najmeddine Echahidi, Suleiman M Kharabsheh, Fakhr Ayoubi, Kamal Alghalayni, Jehad Alburaiki, Bahaa Fadel, Feras Bader, Hadi Skouri, Mohamad Hamade, Marta Załęska-Kocięcka, Federica Guidetti, Nathan Mewton, Dania Mohty
{"title":"Differences in the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction among physicians from Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: an international survey.","authors":"Mohamed H Omer, Anastasia Shchendrygina, Omar Ahmad, Clara Saldarriaga, Sydney Goldfeder de Gracia, Mosaad Alhussain, Najmeddine Echahidi, Suleiman M Kharabsheh, Fakhr Ayoubi, Kamal Alghalayni, Jehad Alburaiki, Bahaa Fadel, Feras Bader, Hadi Skouri, Mohamad Hamade, Marta Załęska-Kocięcka, Federica Guidetti, Nathan Mewton, Dania Mohty","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2025-003548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) poses global diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with potential regional differences in clinical practice that remain underexplored. This study aimed to map physician-reported HFpEF diagnostic and management practices across Europe and the Middle East-North Africa (MENA) region to identify similarities, differences and opportunities for improved care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An independent, academically developed survey consisting of 29 questions was designed through expert collaboration to capture detailed information on physician demographics, diagnostic strategies, screening practices, pathophysiological understanding and treatment approaches for HFpEF. The survey was validated by heart failure specialists to ensure relevance and accuracy and distributed widely through professional societies, email and social media channels to reach cardiologists, general practitioners and other physicians involved in heart failure care across Europe and MENA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 723 physicians participated (77 from MENA, 646 from Europe). The proportion of heart failure specialists was higher in Europe (26%) than in MENA (12%, p<0.001), while general cardiologists comprised a larger share in MENA (81% vs 59%, p<0.001). Natriuretic peptide testing use was lower in MENA (82%) compared with Europe (92%, p=0.023). Pharmacotherapy preferences showed both regional similarities and differences, with SGLT2 inhibitors being the most preferred drug of choice universally. In contrast, there was a higher ranking of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in Europe (p=0.007) and greater reported use of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors in MENA (p=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This large international survey offers a descriptive mapping of HFpEF care practices across Europe and MENA, revealing overall guideline alignment but also regional differences in diagnostic test use and pharmacotherapy preferences. These findings underscore the need for targeted education, improved diagnostic and therapeutic access and tailored guideline implementation to ensure equitable, evidence-based HFpEF management across diverse healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359493/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) poses global diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with potential regional differences in clinical practice that remain underexplored. This study aimed to map physician-reported HFpEF diagnostic and management practices across Europe and the Middle East-North Africa (MENA) region to identify similarities, differences and opportunities for improved care.
Methods: An independent, academically developed survey consisting of 29 questions was designed through expert collaboration to capture detailed information on physician demographics, diagnostic strategies, screening practices, pathophysiological understanding and treatment approaches for HFpEF. The survey was validated by heart failure specialists to ensure relevance and accuracy and distributed widely through professional societies, email and social media channels to reach cardiologists, general practitioners and other physicians involved in heart failure care across Europe and MENA.
Results: A total of 723 physicians participated (77 from MENA, 646 from Europe). The proportion of heart failure specialists was higher in Europe (26%) than in MENA (12%, p<0.001), while general cardiologists comprised a larger share in MENA (81% vs 59%, p<0.001). Natriuretic peptide testing use was lower in MENA (82%) compared with Europe (92%, p=0.023). Pharmacotherapy preferences showed both regional similarities and differences, with SGLT2 inhibitors being the most preferred drug of choice universally. In contrast, there was a higher ranking of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in Europe (p=0.007) and greater reported use of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors in MENA (p=0.03).
Conclusion: This large international survey offers a descriptive mapping of HFpEF care practices across Europe and MENA, revealing overall guideline alignment but also regional differences in diagnostic test use and pharmacotherapy preferences. These findings underscore the need for targeted education, improved diagnostic and therapeutic access and tailored guideline implementation to ensure equitable, evidence-based HFpEF management across diverse healthcare settings.
期刊介绍:
Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.