Renaud Descourt, Florian Guisier, Maurice Pérol, Jacques Cadranel, Helene Doubre, Michael Duruisseaux, Stéphane Culine, Bertrand Mennecier, Olivier Bylicki, Christos Chouaid, Laurent Greillier
{"title":"Alectinib Efficacy Post-Brigatinib Against Advanced <i>ALK</i>+ Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (BrigALK2-GFPC 02-2019 Study).","authors":"Renaud Descourt, Florian Guisier, Maurice Pérol, Jacques Cadranel, Helene Doubre, Michael Duruisseaux, Stéphane Culine, Bertrand Mennecier, Olivier Bylicki, Christos Chouaid, Laurent Greillier","doi":"10.2147/LCTT.S522038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brigatinib and alectinib are next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors (ALKis) showing efficacy against naïve and post-crizotinib-treated advanced <i>ALK</i>+ non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Real-world data on alectinib efficacy after brigatinib failure are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Alectinib efficacy was retrospectively assessed in patients previously treated with brigatinib during an early-access program (EAP) from 1 August 2016 to 21 January 2019. The primary endpoint was alectinib median progression-free survival (mPFS) according to local investigators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 183 patients included in the brigatinib EAP, 92 (50.3%) received ≥1 agent(s) post-brigatinib; 30 (16.4%) received alectinib, 19 (10.4%) immediately post-brigatinib; 11 (6%) after ≥1 other treatment line(s). With median follow-up at 25.5 (95% CI: 10.6-30.5) months, mPFS on brigatinib for the study population (n = 30) was 13.6 (95% CI: 6.3-17.7) months. For patients given alectinib immediately post-brigatinib, mPFS and median overall survival (mOS) were 4.8 (95% CI: 2.0-12.5) and 27 (95% CI: 12.5-not reached (NR)) months, respectively. In this subgroup, brigatinib was discontinued for toxicity or progression for 5/19 (26%) or 14/19 (74%) patients, with mPFS lasting 12.5 (95% CI: 3.3-17.9 and 3.4 (95% CI: 0.9-9.2) months, respectively. For patients receiving ≥1 agent(s) between brigatinib and alectinib, with median follow-up at 13.3 (95% CI: 2.3-31.5) months, mPFS and mOS were 5.0 (95% CI: 0.5-18.8) and 19 (95% CI: 2.3-NR) months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results of this retrospective real-world study, alectinib post-brigatinib showed limited overall activity but remains an option for patients with advanced <i>ALK</i>+ NSCLCs, especially when brigatinib was discontinued because of toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":18066,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","volume":"16 ","pages":"107-114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S522038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Brigatinib and alectinib are next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors (ALKis) showing efficacy against naïve and post-crizotinib-treated advanced ALK+ non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Real-world data on alectinib efficacy after brigatinib failure are lacking.
Methods: Alectinib efficacy was retrospectively assessed in patients previously treated with brigatinib during an early-access program (EAP) from 1 August 2016 to 21 January 2019. The primary endpoint was alectinib median progression-free survival (mPFS) according to local investigators.
Results: Among the 183 patients included in the brigatinib EAP, 92 (50.3%) received ≥1 agent(s) post-brigatinib; 30 (16.4%) received alectinib, 19 (10.4%) immediately post-brigatinib; 11 (6%) after ≥1 other treatment line(s). With median follow-up at 25.5 (95% CI: 10.6-30.5) months, mPFS on brigatinib for the study population (n = 30) was 13.6 (95% CI: 6.3-17.7) months. For patients given alectinib immediately post-brigatinib, mPFS and median overall survival (mOS) were 4.8 (95% CI: 2.0-12.5) and 27 (95% CI: 12.5-not reached (NR)) months, respectively. In this subgroup, brigatinib was discontinued for toxicity or progression for 5/19 (26%) or 14/19 (74%) patients, with mPFS lasting 12.5 (95% CI: 3.3-17.9 and 3.4 (95% CI: 0.9-9.2) months, respectively. For patients receiving ≥1 agent(s) between brigatinib and alectinib, with median follow-up at 13.3 (95% CI: 2.3-31.5) months, mPFS and mOS were 5.0 (95% CI: 0.5-18.8) and 19 (95% CI: 2.3-NR) months, respectively.
Conclusion: According to the results of this retrospective real-world study, alectinib post-brigatinib showed limited overall activity but remains an option for patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLCs, especially when brigatinib was discontinued because of toxicity.