Hysteroscopy in Asymptomatic Postmenopausal Women with Thickened Endometrium: Analyzing Clinical Characteristics and Pathology With an Emphasis on SERM History.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ze Liang, Xiangyu Gu, Yifan Dong, Wenbo Li, Changshuai Lv, Ling Li, Jiali Tong
{"title":"Hysteroscopy in Asymptomatic Postmenopausal Women with Thickened Endometrium: Analyzing Clinical Characteristics and Pathology With an Emphasis on SERM History.","authors":"Ze Liang, Xiangyu Gu, Yifan Dong, Wenbo Li, Changshuai Lv, Ling Li, Jiali Tong","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To optimize cut-off values of endometrial thickness for referral to hysteroscopy among asymptomatic postmenopausal women with thickened endometrium.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>415 asymptomatic postmenopausal cases who underwent hysteroscopy with thickened endometrium between January 2014 to January 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients with endometrium thicker than 5mm underwent hysteroscopy for endometrial pathological examination.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Transvaginal sonography (TVS) reports of 37732 patients who had ET ≥ 5mm were reviewed. Among them, 415 patients were postmenopausal and asymptomatic. Their clinical characteristics were analyzed retrospectively, including demographic data, TVS reports, hysteroscopy surgery records, and pathology results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Endometrial thickness significantly differed between patients whose samples were pathologically benign and those who turned out premalignant or malignant (χ<sup>2</sup> = 70.7, P < .001). The observed endometrial morphology during hysteroscopy varied notably between these groups (χ<sup>2</sup> = 33.3, p < .001). Logistic regression revealed significant associations between treatment by Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator (SERM; OR = 3.2, p = .04), increased endometrial thickness (OR = 3.7, p < .001), and abnormal endometrial morphology (OR = 3.4, p < .001) with non-benign outcomes. To differentiate for non-benign pathology, the optimal endometrial thickness cut-offs were 10.5mm for all asymptomatic patients with thickened endometrium, 10.5mm for those with concurrent intrauterine lesions, and 19.5mm for those with a history of SERM treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing the endometrial thickness cut-off value in asymptomatic postmenopausal women, especially for those with a history of SERM treatment, would improve patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.08.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To optimize cut-off values of endometrial thickness for referral to hysteroscopy among asymptomatic postmenopausal women with thickened endometrium.

Design: A retrospective observational analysis.

Setting: A teaching hospital.

Patients: 415 asymptomatic postmenopausal cases who underwent hysteroscopy with thickened endometrium between January 2014 to January 2023.

Interventions: Patients with endometrium thicker than 5mm underwent hysteroscopy for endometrial pathological examination.

Measurements: Transvaginal sonography (TVS) reports of 37732 patients who had ET ≥ 5mm were reviewed. Among them, 415 patients were postmenopausal and asymptomatic. Their clinical characteristics were analyzed retrospectively, including demographic data, TVS reports, hysteroscopy surgery records, and pathology results.

Results: Endometrial thickness significantly differed between patients whose samples were pathologically benign and those who turned out premalignant or malignant (χ2 = 70.7, P < .001). The observed endometrial morphology during hysteroscopy varied notably between these groups (χ2 = 33.3, p < .001). Logistic regression revealed significant associations between treatment by Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator (SERM; OR = 3.2, p = .04), increased endometrial thickness (OR = 3.7, p < .001), and abnormal endometrial morphology (OR = 3.4, p < .001) with non-benign outcomes. To differentiate for non-benign pathology, the optimal endometrial thickness cut-offs were 10.5mm for all asymptomatic patients with thickened endometrium, 10.5mm for those with concurrent intrauterine lesions, and 19.5mm for those with a history of SERM treatment.

Conclusions: Increasing the endometrial thickness cut-off value in asymptomatic postmenopausal women, especially for those with a history of SERM treatment, would improve patient management.

无症状绝经后子宫内膜增厚妇女的宫腔镜检查:分析临床特征和病理,重点是SERM史。
目的:优化无症状的绝经后子宫内膜增厚妇女转宫腔镜的子宫内膜厚度临界值。设计:回顾性观察性分析。环境:教学医院。患者:2014年1月至2023年1月行子宫内膜增厚宫腔镜检查的无症状绝经后患者415例。干预措施:子宫内膜厚度大于5mm的患者行宫腔镜检查子宫内膜病理。测量方法:回顾了37732例ET≥5mm患者的经阴道超声(TVS)报告。其中绝经后无症状415例。回顾性分析其临床特征,包括人口统计学资料、TVS报告、宫腔镜手术记录和病理结果。结果:病理良性组与癌前、恶性组子宫内膜厚度差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 70.7,P < 0.001)。两组间宫腔镜检查子宫内膜形态差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 33.3,P < 0.001)。Logistic回归分析显示,选择性雌激素受体调节剂(SERM)治疗组与对照组之间存在显著相关性;OR = 3.2,P = 。04),子宫内膜厚度增加(OR = 3.7,P < .001),子宫内膜形态异常(OR = 3.4,P < .001),伴有非良性结局。为了区分非良性病理,所有无症状的子宫内膜增厚患者的最佳子宫内膜厚度临界值为10.5mm,同时伴有宫内病变的患者为10.5mm,有SERM治疗史的患者为19.5mm。结论:增加无症状绝经后妇女的子宫内膜厚度临界值,特别是那些有SERM治疗史的妇女,将改善患者的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信