Intravenous Argatroban or Eptifibatide in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Subgroup Analysis of the MOST Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 21.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ian Rines, Opeolu Adeoye, Andrew D Barreto, Joseph Broderick, Janice Carrozzella, Hui Chen, Mauricio Concha, Jordan Elm, James C Grotta, Adam S Jasne, Pooja Khatri, Akash Roy, Achala Vagal, Max Wintermark, Albert J Yoo, Colin P Derdeyn
{"title":"Intravenous Argatroban or Eptifibatide in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Subgroup Analysis of the MOST Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Ian Rines, Opeolu Adeoye, Andrew D Barreto, Joseph Broderick, Janice Carrozzella, Hui Chen, Mauricio Concha, Jordan Elm, James C Grotta, Adam S Jasne, Pooja Khatri, Akash Roy, Achala Vagal, Max Wintermark, Albert J Yoo, Colin P Derdeyn","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.2794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The addition of direct thrombin inhibitors or glycoprotein platelet inhibitors to intravenous thrombolysis in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke may improve reperfusion rates and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the safety and efficacy of these agents.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a preplanned cohort analysis from the Multi-Arm Optimization of Stroke Thrombolysis (MOST) randomized clinical trial, which lasted from 2019 to 2023 with a 90-day follow-up. Centrally read outcomes were assessed blinded to treatment. The MOST study was a multicenter, multiarm, adaptive, single-blind, phase 3 trial that included patients with acute ischemic stroke who were selected for thrombectomy per standard of care.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized to placebo, argatroban, or eptifibatide within 75 minutes of intravenous thrombolysis.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The 90-day utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (UW-mRS) score (range, 0-10, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes) was used as the primary outcome measure. Reperfusion rates and safety (hemorrhage rates) were also assessed, where good reperfusion was defined as a Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b/2c/3 on the completion angiogram.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5376 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of these individuals, 4332 did not meet inclusion criteria, 251 eligible patients did not have consent obtained, 279 were excluded for other reasons, and 514 were randomized in the MOST trial. A total of 254 were planned for thrombectomy (110 in the placebo group, 31 in the argatroban group, and 113 in the eptifibatide group). Mean (SD) age was 68 (14.3) years, and 134 (53%) were female. Of these patients, 219 received thrombectomy: 94 in the placebo group, 27 in the argatroban group, and 98 in the eptifibatide group. There was no effect of treatment on outcome (mean UW-mRS score: eptifibatide, 6.47; 95% CI, 5.79-7.15; argatroban, 5.35; 95% CI, 4.13-6.58; placebo, 6.68; 95% CI, 5.98-7.39). Rates of good reperfusion were similar between groups (83 of 92 in the placebo group [83%]; 17 of 27 in the argatroban group [63%], and 82 of 98 in the eptifibatide group [84%]). The proportion of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results of this secondary analysis of the MOST randomized clinical trial reveal that the addition of argatroban or eptifibatide to intravenous thrombolysis was not associated with better reperfusion rates or clinical outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. Future investigations of these agents as intravenous adjuncts to thrombectomy should focus on populations who are ineligible for intravenous thrombolysis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03735979.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.2794","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The addition of direct thrombin inhibitors or glycoprotein platelet inhibitors to intravenous thrombolysis in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke may improve reperfusion rates and clinical outcomes.

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of these agents.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a preplanned cohort analysis from the Multi-Arm Optimization of Stroke Thrombolysis (MOST) randomized clinical trial, which lasted from 2019 to 2023 with a 90-day follow-up. Centrally read outcomes were assessed blinded to treatment. The MOST study was a multicenter, multiarm, adaptive, single-blind, phase 3 trial that included patients with acute ischemic stroke who were selected for thrombectomy per standard of care.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to placebo, argatroban, or eptifibatide within 75 minutes of intravenous thrombolysis.

Main outcomes and measures: The 90-day utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (UW-mRS) score (range, 0-10, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes) was used as the primary outcome measure. Reperfusion rates and safety (hemorrhage rates) were also assessed, where good reperfusion was defined as a Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b/2c/3 on the completion angiogram.

Results: A total of 5376 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of these individuals, 4332 did not meet inclusion criteria, 251 eligible patients did not have consent obtained, 279 were excluded for other reasons, and 514 were randomized in the MOST trial. A total of 254 were planned for thrombectomy (110 in the placebo group, 31 in the argatroban group, and 113 in the eptifibatide group). Mean (SD) age was 68 (14.3) years, and 134 (53%) were female. Of these patients, 219 received thrombectomy: 94 in the placebo group, 27 in the argatroban group, and 98 in the eptifibatide group. There was no effect of treatment on outcome (mean UW-mRS score: eptifibatide, 6.47; 95% CI, 5.79-7.15; argatroban, 5.35; 95% CI, 4.13-6.58; placebo, 6.68; 95% CI, 5.98-7.39). Rates of good reperfusion were similar between groups (83 of 92 in the placebo group [83%]; 17 of 27 in the argatroban group [63%], and 82 of 98 in the eptifibatide group [84%]). The proportion of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was similar between groups.

Conclusions and relevance: Results of this secondary analysis of the MOST randomized clinical trial reveal that the addition of argatroban or eptifibatide to intravenous thrombolysis was not associated with better reperfusion rates or clinical outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. Future investigations of these agents as intravenous adjuncts to thrombectomy should focus on populations who are ineligible for intravenous thrombolysis.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03735979.

机械取栓患者静脉注射阿加曲班或依替巴肽:MOST随机临床试验的亚组分析
重要性:急性缺血性卒中血管内取栓患者静脉溶栓时,直接加入凝血酶抑制剂或糖蛋白血小板抑制剂可能改善再灌注率和临床结果。目的:探讨这些药物的安全性和有效性。设计、环境和参与者:这是一项来自多臂优化脑卒中溶栓(MOST)随机临床试验的预先计划队列分析,该试验从2019年持续到2023年,随访90天。中心阅读的结果对治疗进行盲法评估。MOST研究是一项多中心、多组、适应性、单盲、3期试验,纳入了急性缺血性卒中患者,这些患者根据标准护理被选择进行血栓切除术。干预措施:患者在静脉溶栓75分钟内随机分到安慰剂、阿加曲班或依替巴肽组。主要结局和测量方法:采用90天效用加权修正兰金量表(UW-mRS)评分(范围0-10,得分越高反映结果越好)作为主要结局测量方法。再灌注率和安全性(出血率)也被评估,再灌注良好被定义为脑梗死溶栓完成血管造影评分为2b/2c/3。结果:共有5376例患者被评估为合格。在这些个体中,4332名不符合纳入标准,251名符合条件的患者未获得同意,279名因其他原因被排除在外,514名随机纳入MOST试验。总共有254人计划进行血栓切除术(安慰剂组110人,阿加曲班组31人,依替巴肽组113人)。平均(SD)年龄为68岁(14.3岁),女性134例(53%)。在这些患者中,219人接受了取栓术:安慰剂组94人,阿加曲班组27人,依替巴肽组98人。治疗对结局没有影响(平均UW-mRS评分:依替巴肽,6.47;95% CI, 5.79-7.15;阿加曲班,5.35;95% CI, 4.13-6.58;安慰剂,6.68;95% CI, 5.98-7.39)。两组间良好再灌注率相似(安慰剂组92例中83例[83%],阿加曲班组27例中17例[63%],依替巴肽组98例中82例[84%])。两组间出现症状性颅内出血的比例相似。结论和相关性:MOST随机临床试验的二级分析结果显示,静脉溶栓中加入阿加曲班或依替巴肽与血管内取栓患者更好的再灌注率或临床结果无关。未来对这些药物作为静脉溶栓辅助药物的研究应集中在不适合静脉溶栓的人群中。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03735979。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信