Refining the Interaction Between Social Norms and Uncertainty About Risk Perceptions in Health and Environmental Behaviors- A Cross-Cultural Replication and Extension.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Jie Zhuang, Jingyuan Shi, Jian Rui, Xiaoyu Xia, Jing Zeng
{"title":"Refining the Interaction Between Social Norms and Uncertainty About Risk Perceptions in Health and Environmental Behaviors- A Cross-Cultural Replication and Extension.","authors":"Jie Zhuang, Jingyuan Shi, Jian Rui, Xiaoyu Xia, Jing Zeng","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2544234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social norms play a crucial role in shaping risk-mitigating behaviors, prompting extensive research to advance theory, and inform practices. However, until recently, limited attention has been given to how individuals' (meta)cognitive appraisals of risks may interact with social norms to affect risk-mitigating behaviors. Expanding previous work, this study employs a cross-sectional survey (<i>N</i> = 1,249) to (1) further differentiates <i>risk perceptions</i> from <i>uncertainty about risk perceptions</i>, (2) test the interaction between two types of social norms and (uncertainty about) risk perceptions, and (3) replicate the findings across two cultural contexts (i.e. Hong Kong, and US). Findings reveal that uncertainty about perceived risk, rather than risk perceptions, shapes the strength and direction of the effects of social norms on behavioral intention. Specifically, when uncertainty about perceived susceptibility is high, the effect of social norms on behavioral intention is stronger for individuals who are more than less uncertain about the severity of a risk. Although the findings are largely consistent across the two subsamples, notable cultural variations also emerge. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2544234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social norms play a crucial role in shaping risk-mitigating behaviors, prompting extensive research to advance theory, and inform practices. However, until recently, limited attention has been given to how individuals' (meta)cognitive appraisals of risks may interact with social norms to affect risk-mitigating behaviors. Expanding previous work, this study employs a cross-sectional survey (N = 1,249) to (1) further differentiates risk perceptions from uncertainty about risk perceptions, (2) test the interaction between two types of social norms and (uncertainty about) risk perceptions, and (3) replicate the findings across two cultural contexts (i.e. Hong Kong, and US). Findings reveal that uncertainty about perceived risk, rather than risk perceptions, shapes the strength and direction of the effects of social norms on behavioral intention. Specifically, when uncertainty about perceived susceptibility is high, the effect of social norms on behavioral intention is stronger for individuals who are more than less uncertain about the severity of a risk. Although the findings are largely consistent across the two subsamples, notable cultural variations also emerge. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

细化社会规范与健康和环境行为中风险感知的不确定性之间的相互作用——跨文化复制和扩展。
社会规范在塑造风险缓解行为方面发挥着至关重要的作用,促使广泛的研究来推进理论,并为实践提供信息。然而,直到最近,很少有人关注个体对风险的(元)认知评估如何与社会规范相互作用,从而影响风险缓解行为。本研究采用横截面调查(N = 1,249)来扩展先前的工作,以:(1)进一步区分风险感知与风险感知的不确定性,(2)测试两种社会规范与风险感知(不确定性)之间的相互作用,以及(3)在两个文化背景下(即香港和美国)复制研究结果。研究结果表明,对感知风险的不确定性,而不是对风险的感知,决定了社会规范对行为意向影响的强度和方向。具体来说,当感知易感性的不确定性很高时,社会规范对行为意图的影响对于那些对风险严重程度不确定的个体来说更强。尽管这两个子样本的研究结果在很大程度上是一致的,但也出现了显著的文化差异。讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信