Epilepsy as a dynamic disease: Toward actionable, individualized seizure risk prediction.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-08-18 DOI:10.1111/epi.18602
Kai Michael Schubert, Anthony G Marson, Eugen Trinka, Marian Galovic
{"title":"Epilepsy as a dynamic disease: Toward actionable, individualized seizure risk prediction.","authors":"Kai Michael Schubert, Anthony G Marson, Eugen Trinka, Marian Galovic","doi":"10.1111/epi.18602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current definition of epilepsy allows diagnosis after a single unprovoked seizure if the estimated 10-year recurrence risk is ≥60%. While this framework is grounded in epidemiological evidence, it does not align with the shorter time horizons that guide many clinical and personal decisions. In acquired epilepsies, such as those following stroke, traumatic brain injury, or CNS infections, most recurrences occur within 1-2 years, with risk declining sharply thereafter. This temporal clustering challenges the use of static, long-term risk thresholds in isolation. Dynamic tools, such as the Chance of an Occurrence of a Seizure in the Next Year (COSY) and validated prognostic models (e.g., SeLECT, CAVE, RISE), offer recalculable, near-term estimates that reflect evolving patient status. These metrics can improve communication, inform treatment thresholds through Number Needed to Treat (NNT) calculations, and enhance clinical trial recruitment by targeting periods of highest risk. However, barriers remain, including limited integration into guidelines, gaps in external validation, and the \"Oedipus effect,\" where probabilistic predictions influence patient behavior, treatment decisions, and research outcomes. Incorporating individualized, time-sensitive risk prediction into clinical frameworks may better align diagnostic definitions with patient needs, reduce overtreatment, and optimize both everyday care and research in epilepsy prevention and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18602","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current definition of epilepsy allows diagnosis after a single unprovoked seizure if the estimated 10-year recurrence risk is ≥60%. While this framework is grounded in epidemiological evidence, it does not align with the shorter time horizons that guide many clinical and personal decisions. In acquired epilepsies, such as those following stroke, traumatic brain injury, or CNS infections, most recurrences occur within 1-2 years, with risk declining sharply thereafter. This temporal clustering challenges the use of static, long-term risk thresholds in isolation. Dynamic tools, such as the Chance of an Occurrence of a Seizure in the Next Year (COSY) and validated prognostic models (e.g., SeLECT, CAVE, RISE), offer recalculable, near-term estimates that reflect evolving patient status. These metrics can improve communication, inform treatment thresholds through Number Needed to Treat (NNT) calculations, and enhance clinical trial recruitment by targeting periods of highest risk. However, barriers remain, including limited integration into guidelines, gaps in external validation, and the "Oedipus effect," where probabilistic predictions influence patient behavior, treatment decisions, and research outcomes. Incorporating individualized, time-sensitive risk prediction into clinical frameworks may better align diagnostic definitions with patient needs, reduce overtreatment, and optimize both everyday care and research in epilepsy prevention and management.

癫痫作为一种动态疾病:走向可操作的、个体化的癫痫发作风险预测。
目前对癫痫的定义是,如果估计10年复发风险≥60%,则允许在单次非诱发性癫痫发作后进行诊断。虽然这一框架以流行病学证据为基础,但它与指导许多临床和个人决定的较短时间范围不一致。在获得性癫痫中,如中风、外伤性脑损伤或中枢神经系统感染后的癫痫,大多数复发发生在1-2年内,此后风险急剧下降。这种时间聚类对孤立地使用静态长期风险阈值提出了挑战。动态工具,如明年发生癫痫发作的几率(COSY)和经过验证的预后模型(如SeLECT、CAVE、RISE),提供了可重新计算的近期估计,反映了不断变化的患者状态。这些指标可以改善沟通,通过计算所需治疗数量(NNT)告知治疗阈值,并通过针对最高风险期加强临床试验招募。然而,障碍仍然存在,包括指南的有限整合,外部验证的差距,以及“俄狄浦斯效应”,即概率预测影响患者行为,治疗决策和研究结果。将个体化、时变风险预测纳入临床框架,可以更好地使诊断定义与患者需求保持一致,减少过度治疗,并优化癫痫预防和管理方面的日常护理和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信