Martin Stork, Jakub Radocha, Jana Mihalyova, Ivan Spicka, Tomas Pika, Alexandra Jungova, Ivanna Boichuk, Klara Mensikova, Jan Straub, Frantisek Sedlak, Jiri Minarik, Petra Krhovska, Denisa Novakova, Michaela Hornakova, Zdenka Knechtova, Nela Sendlerova, Tereza Dekojova, Vladimir Maisnar, Tomas Jelinek, Roman Hajek, Ludek Pour
{"title":"De-escalated Teclistamab dosing in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Czech myeloma group real-world evidence analysis","authors":"Martin Stork, Jakub Radocha, Jana Mihalyova, Ivan Spicka, Tomas Pika, Alexandra Jungova, Ivanna Boichuk, Klara Mensikova, Jan Straub, Frantisek Sedlak, Jiri Minarik, Petra Krhovska, Denisa Novakova, Michaela Hornakova, Zdenka Knechtova, Nela Sendlerova, Tereza Dekojova, Vladimir Maisnar, Tomas Jelinek, Roman Hajek, Ludek Pour","doi":"10.1007/s00277-025-06529-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Teclistamab, a BCMA×CD3 bispecific antibody, demonstrates high efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, optimal dosing strategies outside clinical trials remain undefined. Thus, we performed a retrospective, multicentre analysis of 73 RRMM patients treated with teclistamab monotherapy at Czech Myeloma Group centres between 2023 and 2025. The study compared efficacy and safety between patients receiving standard weekly dosing and those with reduced-frequency dosing. The whole cohort had a median age of 67 years; 68.5% were penta-refractory. Dosing was de-escalated in 24.7% of patients, typically within one month of treatment initiation. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.41 months and was comparable between weekly and non-weekly groups (9.1 vs. 11.3 months; <i>p</i> = 0.141), despite a significantly lower relative dose intensity in the latter (60.5% vs. 87.0%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Infection rates and severe adverse events were similar between groups. A lower incidence of neutropenia was observed with less frequent dosing, but this did not translate into reduced infection burden. In conclusion, in real-world practice, early de-escalation of teclistamab dosing appears to maintain clinical efficacy. These findings support ongoing efforts to individualize treatment schedules with the aim of balancing effectiveness, tolerability, and patient-specific factors in BCMA-targeted therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":"104 8","pages":"4141 - 4147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00277-025-06529-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00277-025-06529-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Teclistamab, a BCMA×CD3 bispecific antibody, demonstrates high efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, optimal dosing strategies outside clinical trials remain undefined. Thus, we performed a retrospective, multicentre analysis of 73 RRMM patients treated with teclistamab monotherapy at Czech Myeloma Group centres between 2023 and 2025. The study compared efficacy and safety between patients receiving standard weekly dosing and those with reduced-frequency dosing. The whole cohort had a median age of 67 years; 68.5% were penta-refractory. Dosing was de-escalated in 24.7% of patients, typically within one month of treatment initiation. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.41 months and was comparable between weekly and non-weekly groups (9.1 vs. 11.3 months; p = 0.141), despite a significantly lower relative dose intensity in the latter (60.5% vs. 87.0%; p < 0.001). Infection rates and severe adverse events were similar between groups. A lower incidence of neutropenia was observed with less frequent dosing, but this did not translate into reduced infection burden. In conclusion, in real-world practice, early de-escalation of teclistamab dosing appears to maintain clinical efficacy. These findings support ongoing efforts to individualize treatment schedules with the aim of balancing effectiveness, tolerability, and patient-specific factors in BCMA-targeted therapy.
Teclistamab是一种BCMA×CD3双特异性抗体,对复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)有很高的疗效。然而,临床试验之外的最佳给药策略仍不明确。因此,我们对2023年至2025年间捷克骨髓瘤集团中心接受teclistamab单药治疗的73例RRMM患者进行了回顾性多中心分析。该研究比较了接受标准每周给药和减少频率给药的患者的疗效和安全性。整个队列的中位年龄为67岁;68.5%为五耐火材料。24.7%的患者在开始治疗的一个月内减少了剂量。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为9.41个月,在每周治疗组和非每周治疗组之间具有可比性(9.1个月vs. 11.3个月;p = 0.141),尽管后者的相对剂量强度明显较低(60.5% vs. 87.0%; p = 0.141)
期刊介绍:
Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.