Validated prediction of xerostomia in a real-world population: a step toward model-guided radiotherapy.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Emmy Dalqvist, Tiziana Rancati, Anna Embring, Gabriella Alexandersson von Döbeln, Ingmar Lax, Signe Friesland, Eva Onjukka
{"title":"Validated prediction of xerostomia in a real-world population: a step toward model-guided radiotherapy.","authors":"Emmy Dalqvist, Tiziana Rancati, Anna Embring, Gabriella Alexandersson von Döbeln, Ingmar Lax, Signe Friesland, Eva Onjukka","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to validate an Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) model for xerostomia in a large quality-registry cohort, enabling its future use in individualized NTCP-based treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A model predicting grade ≥ 2 xerostomia (6 months post-radiotherapy) was selected for validation, including the mean dose to both the parotid and the submandibular glands, in addition to the baseline score for xerostomia, as predictors. Our local validation cohort consisted of 674 patients (204 events), treated between 2012 and 2024, with a median follow-up of 10.3 months (range 5-24). A closed testing procedure was performed to investigate the need for model updating, and the performance of the models was assessed with calibration curves, discrimination, the Brier score, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The calibration curve demonstrated that the model predicted the dose-response relationship well. The validation cohort showed a slightly stronger dose response, with a slope of 1.16. The calibration intercept of -0.12 revealed an overestimation of xerostomia. However, the closed testing procedure indicated that a recalibration of the model was needed, and the HL-test showed a significant deviation. The recalibrated model showed perfect calibration but still limited discrimination (Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The validated model performed well in our real-life dataset despite the differences between the training and validation cohorts, particularly considering the lack of baseline score in our cohort. This highlights the potential for improved performance with baseline inclusion but still suggests that an individualized NTCP-based treatment-planning protocol can be developed using the recalibrated published model.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"1087-1094"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The aim of this study is to validate an Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) model for xerostomia in a large quality-registry cohort, enabling its future use in individualized NTCP-based treatment planning.

Material and methods: A model predicting grade ≥ 2 xerostomia (6 months post-radiotherapy) was selected for validation, including the mean dose to both the parotid and the submandibular glands, in addition to the baseline score for xerostomia, as predictors. Our local validation cohort consisted of 674 patients (204 events), treated between 2012 and 2024, with a median follow-up of 10.3 months (range 5-24). A closed testing procedure was performed to investigate the need for model updating, and the performance of the models was assessed with calibration curves, discrimination, the Brier score, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

Results: The calibration curve demonstrated that the model predicted the dose-response relationship well. The validation cohort showed a slightly stronger dose response, with a slope of 1.16. The calibration intercept of -0.12 revealed an overestimation of xerostomia. However, the closed testing procedure indicated that a recalibration of the model was needed, and the HL-test showed a significant deviation. The recalibrated model showed perfect calibration but still limited discrimination (Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0.62).

Conclusion: The validated model performed well in our real-life dataset despite the differences between the training and validation cohorts, particularly considering the lack of baseline score in our cohort. This highlights the potential for improved performance with baseline inclusion but still suggests that an individualized NTCP-based treatment-planning protocol can be developed using the recalibrated published model.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在现实世界人群中对口干症的有效预测:迈向模型引导放疗的一步。
背景和目的:本研究的目的是在一个大型质量注册队列中验证正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)模型对口干症的影响,使其能够在未来个性化的基于NTCP的治疗计划中使用。材料和方法:选择一个预测≥2级口干症(放疗后6个月)的模型进行验证,包括腮腺和下颌下腺的平均剂量,以及口干症的基线评分作为预测因素。我们的本地验证队列包括674名患者(204个事件),在2012年至2024年期间接受治疗,中位随访时间为10.3个月(范围5-24)。采用封闭检验程序来调查模型更新的必要性,并通过校准曲线、判别、Brier评分和Hosmer-Lemeshow检验来评估模型的性能。结果:标定曲线表明,该模型能较好地预测剂量-反应关系。验证队列显示稍强的剂量反应,斜率为1.16。校正截距为-0.12,表明对口干症的估计过高。然而,封闭测试程序表明需要对模型进行重新校准,并且hl测试显示有显着偏差。重新校正后的模型具有良好的校正效果,但识别能力仍然有限(曲线下面积(AUC)为0.62)。结论:尽管训练队列和验证队列之间存在差异,但经过验证的模型在我们的真实数据集中表现良好,特别是考虑到我们的队列中缺乏基线评分。这突出了纳入基线后提高疗效的潜力,但仍然表明,可以使用重新校准的已发表模型制定基于非传染性疾病的个体化治疗计划方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信