Liver and Intestinal Fatty Acid Binding Proteins Are Not Critical for Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) Tissue Distribution and Elimination in Mice

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Seyed Mohamad Sadegh Modaresi, Jitka Becanova, Simon Vojta, Sangwoo Ryu, Emily M. Kaye, Juliana Agudelo, Anastasia Diolintzi, Olga Skende, Judith Storch, Fabian C. Fischer* and Angela Slitt*, 
{"title":"Liver and Intestinal Fatty Acid Binding Proteins Are Not Critical for Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) Tissue Distribution and Elimination in Mice","authors":"Seyed Mohamad Sadegh Modaresi,&nbsp;Jitka Becanova,&nbsp;Simon Vojta,&nbsp;Sangwoo Ryu,&nbsp;Emily M. Kaye,&nbsp;Juliana Agudelo,&nbsp;Anastasia Diolintzi,&nbsp;Olga Skende,&nbsp;Judith Storch,&nbsp;Fabian C. Fischer* and Angela Slitt*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) is a persistent environmental pollutant in the per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) class, known to accumulate in the liver and trigger hepatotoxicity. While <i>in vitro</i> studies suggested that fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) drive the hepatic accumulation of PFAS, <i>in vivo</i> evidence is entirely lacking. Using wild-type and mice with global deletion of liver-type and intestine-type FABP (L-FABP<sup>–/–</sup>, I-FABP<sup>–/–</sup>), we measured PFOS toxicokinetics by administering single oral doses (0.1, 0.5, and 5 mg/kg) and tracking blood and excreta levels for 65 days. PFOS levels in various tissues were measured at test end. Additionally, we measured PFAS binding to liver tissues from wild-type and FABP knockout mice. Contrary to previous <i>in vitro</i> findings, FABP deletion did not significantly alter PFOS blood concentrations, tissue distribution, or elimination rates. Elimination half-lives, clearances, and volumes of distribution were consistent across genotypes, suggesting that neither L-FABP nor I-FABP are critical drivers for PFOS <i>in vivo</i> toxicokinetics. <i>In vitro</i> binding assays showed similar liver partition coefficients between wild-type and knockout livers for 15 of 19 PFAS, with small differences for some sulfonamides and fluorotelomer sulfonates. These results challenge the presumed role of L-FABP and/or I-FABP in PFAS toxicokinetics, highlighting the need to explore alternative toxicokinetic mechanisms─such as phospholipid binding and transporter-mediated uptake─driving PFAS distribution and elimination.</p>","PeriodicalId":31,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","volume":"38 9","pages":"1576–1584"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00199","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) is a persistent environmental pollutant in the per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) class, known to accumulate in the liver and trigger hepatotoxicity. While in vitro studies suggested that fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) drive the hepatic accumulation of PFAS, in vivo evidence is entirely lacking. Using wild-type and mice with global deletion of liver-type and intestine-type FABP (L-FABP–/–, I-FABP–/–), we measured PFOS toxicokinetics by administering single oral doses (0.1, 0.5, and 5 mg/kg) and tracking blood and excreta levels for 65 days. PFOS levels in various tissues were measured at test end. Additionally, we measured PFAS binding to liver tissues from wild-type and FABP knockout mice. Contrary to previous in vitro findings, FABP deletion did not significantly alter PFOS blood concentrations, tissue distribution, or elimination rates. Elimination half-lives, clearances, and volumes of distribution were consistent across genotypes, suggesting that neither L-FABP nor I-FABP are critical drivers for PFOS in vivo toxicokinetics. In vitro binding assays showed similar liver partition coefficients between wild-type and knockout livers for 15 of 19 PFAS, with small differences for some sulfonamides and fluorotelomer sulfonates. These results challenge the presumed role of L-FABP and/or I-FABP in PFAS toxicokinetics, highlighting the need to explore alternative toxicokinetic mechanisms─such as phospholipid binding and transporter-mediated uptake─driving PFAS distribution and elimination.

肝脏和肠道脂肪酸结合蛋白对小鼠全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)的组织分布和消除并不重要。
全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)是一种持久性环境污染物,属于全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)类,已知会在肝脏中积累并引发肝毒性。虽然体外研究表明脂肪酸结合蛋白(FABPs)驱动PFAS的肝脏积累,但体内证据完全缺乏。使用野生型和肝脏型和肠道型FABP (L-FABP-/-, I-FABP-/-)全缺失的小鼠,我们通过单次口服剂量(0.1,0.5和5mg /kg)并跟踪血液和排泄物水平,测量了PFOS的毒性动力学,持续65天。在试验结束时测量各组织的全氟辛烷磺酸水平。此外,我们测量了野生型和FABP敲除小鼠的PFAS与肝脏组织的结合。与先前的体外研究结果相反,FABP的缺失并没有显著改变全氟辛烷磺酸的血液浓度、组织分布或消除率。消除半衰期、清除率和分布量在不同基因型中是一致的,这表明L-FABP和I-FABP都不是PFOS体内毒性动力学的关键驱动因素。体外结合试验显示,19种PFAS中有15种的野生型和敲除型肝脏之间的肝脏分割系数相似,某些磺胺类和氟端聚体磺酸盐之间的差异很小。这些结果挑战了假定的L-FABP和/或I-FABP在PFAS毒性动力学中的作用,强调了探索替代毒性动力学机制(如磷脂结合和转运体介导的摄取)驱动PFAS分布和消除的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Research in Toxicology publishes Articles, Rapid Reports, Chemical Profiles, Reviews, Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and ToxWatch on a wide range of topics in Toxicology that inform a chemical and molecular understanding and capacity to predict biological outcomes on the basis of structures and processes. The overarching goal of activities reported in the Journal are to provide knowledge and innovative approaches needed to promote intelligent solutions for human safety and ecosystem preservation. The journal emphasizes insight concerning mechanisms of toxicity over phenomenological observations. It upholds rigorous chemical, physical and mathematical standards for characterization and application of modern techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信