Selective Attention in Early Word Learning: An Eye-Tracking Study on Viewing Naturalistic Egocentric Scenes

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Infancy Pub Date : 2025-08-20 DOI:10.1111/infa.70043
Yayun Zhang, Chen Yu
{"title":"Selective Attention in Early Word Learning: An Eye-Tracking Study on Viewing Naturalistic Egocentric Scenes","authors":"Yayun Zhang,&nbsp;Chen Yu","doi":"10.1111/infa.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To learn a word from an everyday context, infants need to be able to link the heard word with the correct object perceived. A prevailing view of the early learning environment is that infants' world is bombarded with objects and words. Therefore, it is difficult to find the named object from many possible candidates. However, building correct word-referent mappings relies on in-moment visual selection, it is not clear what infants attend to when learning words in a naturalistic context. Toward this goal, we conducted an eye-tracking experiment in which 12-month-old infants were presented with complex visual scenes extracted from infants' egocentric videos recorded during naturalistic parent-child toy play. These scenes were selected at naming moments when parents labeled a toy object during free-flowing play. We selected visual scenes from a mix of more or less ambiguous naming events that contained different visual properties of the named objects and measured infants' real-time object-looking behaviors. We found that, despite the different visual properties of infants' egocentric scenes, early visual attention is both selective and variable. Selective visual attention is highly constrained by the visual saliency of the learning scenes, but not influenced by labels or existing word knowledge. Infants are more likely to attend to the named object when it is salient in the egocentric view. Our results suggest that although infants' naturalistic learning environment appears to be messy in terms of the number of possible objects for a heard object name, their selective attention significantly reduces the in-moment uncertainty associated with object name learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":47895,"journal":{"name":"Infancy","volume":"30 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/infa.70043","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infancy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/infa.70043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To learn a word from an everyday context, infants need to be able to link the heard word with the correct object perceived. A prevailing view of the early learning environment is that infants' world is bombarded with objects and words. Therefore, it is difficult to find the named object from many possible candidates. However, building correct word-referent mappings relies on in-moment visual selection, it is not clear what infants attend to when learning words in a naturalistic context. Toward this goal, we conducted an eye-tracking experiment in which 12-month-old infants were presented with complex visual scenes extracted from infants' egocentric videos recorded during naturalistic parent-child toy play. These scenes were selected at naming moments when parents labeled a toy object during free-flowing play. We selected visual scenes from a mix of more or less ambiguous naming events that contained different visual properties of the named objects and measured infants' real-time object-looking behaviors. We found that, despite the different visual properties of infants' egocentric scenes, early visual attention is both selective and variable. Selective visual attention is highly constrained by the visual saliency of the learning scenes, but not influenced by labels or existing word knowledge. Infants are more likely to attend to the named object when it is salient in the egocentric view. Our results suggest that although infants' naturalistic learning environment appears to be messy in terms of the number of possible objects for a heard object name, their selective attention significantly reduces the in-moment uncertainty associated with object name learning.

Abstract Image

幼儿词汇学习中的选择性注意:观察自然主义自我中心场景的眼动追踪研究
为了从日常环境中学习一个单词,婴儿需要能够将听到的单词与感知到的正确物体联系起来。关于早期学习环境的一个普遍观点是,婴儿的世界被物体和词语轰炸。因此,很难从许多可能的候选对象中找到命名对象。然而,建立正确的词-指称映射依赖于即时视觉选择,目前尚不清楚婴儿在自然语境中学习单词时关注的是什么。为此,我们对12个月大的婴儿进行了一项眼动追踪实验,实验中,我们向他们展示了从婴儿在自然主义亲子玩具中录制的以自我为中心的视频中提取的复杂视觉场景。这些场景是在父母在自由玩耍时给玩具物体贴上标签的命名时刻选择的。我们从混合的或多或少模糊的命名事件中选择了视觉场景,这些事件包含了被命名物体的不同视觉属性,并测量了婴儿的实时对象观看行为。我们发现,尽管婴儿以自我为中心的场景具有不同的视觉特性,但早期视觉注意具有选择性和可变性。选择性视觉注意受学习场景的视觉显着性的高度约束,而不受标签或已有词汇知识的影响。当被命名的物体在自我中心观点中突出时,婴儿更有可能注意到它。我们的研究结果表明,尽管婴儿的自然学习环境在听到物体名称的可能对象数量方面似乎是混乱的,但他们的选择性注意显着减少了与物体名称学习相关的即时不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infancy
Infancy PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Infancy, the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies, emphasizes the highest quality original research on normal and aberrant infant development during the first two years. Both human and animal research are included. In addition to regular length research articles and brief reports (3000-word maximum), the journal includes solicited target articles along with a series of commentaries; debates, in which different theoretical positions are presented along with a series of commentaries; and thematic collections, a group of three to five reports or summaries of research on the same issue, conducted independently at different laboratories, with invited commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信