William M. Brandon, Alan Jacob, Colin Dunn, Song Zhang, Ang Gao, Fernando Torres, Adrian Lawrence, Irina Timofte, Srinivas Bollineni, Manish Mohanka, Juan Deleija-Lujano, Adnan Khan, Joseph Crossno, Michael Wait, Matthias Peltz, Christopher Heid, Lynn Huffman, Steve Ring, John Murala, Suresh Keshavamurthy, Alex Jaye Weston, Vaidehi Kaza
{"title":"Association of Community Distress With Lung Transplant Waitlist Acceptance","authors":"William M. Brandon, Alan Jacob, Colin Dunn, Song Zhang, Ang Gao, Fernando Torres, Adrian Lawrence, Irina Timofte, Srinivas Bollineni, Manish Mohanka, Juan Deleija-Lujano, Adnan Khan, Joseph Crossno, Michael Wait, Matthias Peltz, Christopher Heid, Lynn Huffman, Steve Ring, John Murala, Suresh Keshavamurthy, Alex Jaye Weston, Vaidehi Kaza","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Access to transplantation is not entirely equitable with several studies demonstrating racial and socioeconomic disparities affecting the transplant process and thereby outcomes. Notably, few studies have focused on disparities prior to waitlisting. This study aimed to characterize the impact of community socioeconomic factors as measured by the Distressed Community Index (DCI) on acceptance for lung transplant waitlisting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective review was performed on 463 patients evaluated for lung transplant waitlisting at our institution between 2016 and 2020. Community distress was calculated using the DCI, which yields a composite Distress Index (cDI) and includes data on various community characteristics. Statistical analysis was done using descriptive statistics and logistic regression methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 463 patients included, 333 (71.9%) were accepted and 130 (28.1%) were denied for waitlisting. The mean cDI was 42.5 (±30.0) and 44.8 (±30.8) (<i>p</i> = 0.45) for the accepted and declined groups, respectively, indicating mid-tier distress for both groups by DCI metrics. The cDI was not found to be associated with odds of waitlist acceptance (OR 0.997, CI 0.99–1.004, <i>p</i> = 0.455). Furthermore, there was no association between sex, race, ethnicity, public insurance coverage, or any of the subcomponents of the DCI and the odds of successful waitlisting at our institution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This single-center retrospective evaluation found that cDI, as calculated by the DCI, and the DCI subcomponents were not associated with transplant waitlist acceptance. Future studies should be done evaluating community-level socioeconomic disparities and the utility of community disadvantage indexing tools in the lung transplant waitlisting process, with the intentions of conceptually expanding our understanding of the link between transplant outcomes and biopsychosocial candidacy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.70289","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Access to transplantation is not entirely equitable with several studies demonstrating racial and socioeconomic disparities affecting the transplant process and thereby outcomes. Notably, few studies have focused on disparities prior to waitlisting. This study aimed to characterize the impact of community socioeconomic factors as measured by the Distressed Community Index (DCI) on acceptance for lung transplant waitlisting.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed on 463 patients evaluated for lung transplant waitlisting at our institution between 2016 and 2020. Community distress was calculated using the DCI, which yields a composite Distress Index (cDI) and includes data on various community characteristics. Statistical analysis was done using descriptive statistics and logistic regression methods.
Results
Of the 463 patients included, 333 (71.9%) were accepted and 130 (28.1%) were denied for waitlisting. The mean cDI was 42.5 (±30.0) and 44.8 (±30.8) (p = 0.45) for the accepted and declined groups, respectively, indicating mid-tier distress for both groups by DCI metrics. The cDI was not found to be associated with odds of waitlist acceptance (OR 0.997, CI 0.99–1.004, p = 0.455). Furthermore, there was no association between sex, race, ethnicity, public insurance coverage, or any of the subcomponents of the DCI and the odds of successful waitlisting at our institution.
Conclusion
This single-center retrospective evaluation found that cDI, as calculated by the DCI, and the DCI subcomponents were not associated with transplant waitlist acceptance. Future studies should be done evaluating community-level socioeconomic disparities and the utility of community disadvantage indexing tools in the lung transplant waitlisting process, with the intentions of conceptually expanding our understanding of the link between transplant outcomes and biopsychosocial candidacy.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.