Prospective parents' views on reproductive genetic carrier screening: “You know better, you do better”

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Chaya M. Goldman, Sharon Lewis, John Massie, Edwin P. Kirk, Allison Symons, Martin B. Delatycki
{"title":"Prospective parents' views on reproductive genetic carrier screening: “You know better, you do better”","authors":"Chaya M. Goldman,&nbsp;Sharon Lewis,&nbsp;John Massie,&nbsp;Edwin P. Kirk,&nbsp;Allison Symons,&nbsp;Martin B. Delatycki","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) allows screening for hundreds of autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions. Multiple clinical professional bodies recommend that RGCS be offered to all prospective parents. There is some research into attitudes to targeted carrier screening for conditions common in specific populations. However, the attitudes of the public to RGCS for many conditions have not been extensively studied in Australia. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of adults without a personal or familial history of a genetic condition on the inclusion of conditions with varying clinical characteristics in RGCS panels. In 15 semi-structured telephone interviews, participants of reproductive age recruited from an obstetric ultrasound clinic and with convenience sampling in Melbourne, Australia, were presented with descriptions of seven groups of conditions with a range of severities. Participants were asked their views on whether the condition should be included in RGCS and whether they would choose to undertake screening for the condition. Data was co-coded by at least two members of the research team and analyzed with quantitative content analysis and qualitative inductive content analysis. Most participants support the inclusion of a wide range of conditions on screening panels. The perceived severity of the conditions presented to prospective parents influenced their reproductive decision-making. Even if they would not alter their reproductive choices based on a high-risk result, this largely did not influence their views regarding the full range of conditions they believe should be included in carrier screening panels. Participants saw value in the choice and knowledge provided by RGCS panels. Reasons for excluding certain types of conditions included a perceived mild impact on quality of life and concern over societal impacts from broad screening. This study indicates that prospective parents want a tiered approach to RGCS and the ability to choose the severity of conditions included in screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70100","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) allows screening for hundreds of autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions. Multiple clinical professional bodies recommend that RGCS be offered to all prospective parents. There is some research into attitudes to targeted carrier screening for conditions common in specific populations. However, the attitudes of the public to RGCS for many conditions have not been extensively studied in Australia. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of adults without a personal or familial history of a genetic condition on the inclusion of conditions with varying clinical characteristics in RGCS panels. In 15 semi-structured telephone interviews, participants of reproductive age recruited from an obstetric ultrasound clinic and with convenience sampling in Melbourne, Australia, were presented with descriptions of seven groups of conditions with a range of severities. Participants were asked their views on whether the condition should be included in RGCS and whether they would choose to undertake screening for the condition. Data was co-coded by at least two members of the research team and analyzed with quantitative content analysis and qualitative inductive content analysis. Most participants support the inclusion of a wide range of conditions on screening panels. The perceived severity of the conditions presented to prospective parents influenced their reproductive decision-making. Even if they would not alter their reproductive choices based on a high-risk result, this largely did not influence their views regarding the full range of conditions they believe should be included in carrier screening panels. Participants saw value in the choice and knowledge provided by RGCS panels. Reasons for excluding certain types of conditions included a perceived mild impact on quality of life and concern over societal impacts from broad screening. This study indicates that prospective parents want a tiered approach to RGCS and the ability to choose the severity of conditions included in screening.

准父母对生殖基因携带者筛查的看法:“你懂的越好,你做的越好”
生殖遗传载体筛查(RGCS)允许筛查数百种常染色体隐性和x连锁病症。多个临床专业机构建议向所有准父母提供RGCS。有一些研究是关于对特定人群中常见疾病的靶向携带者筛查的态度。然而,公众对RGCS在许多情况下的态度在澳大利亚还没有得到广泛的研究。本研究的目的是调查没有个人或家族遗传病史的成年人对纳入RGCS小组中具有不同临床特征的疾病的看法。在15个半结构化的电话访谈中,从澳大利亚墨尔本的一家产科超声诊所和方便的抽样中招募了育龄参与者,向他们介绍了七组严重程度不同的情况。参加者被问及他们对是否应将该疾病纳入RGCS的意见,以及他们是否会选择对该疾病进行筛查。数据由至少两名研究小组成员共同编码,并采用定量内容分析和定性归纳内容分析进行分析。大多数嘉宾支持在甄选小组中加入范围广泛的条件。对未来父母的病情严重性的感知影响了他们的生育决策。即使他们不会因为高风险的结果而改变他们的生育选择,这在很大程度上也不会影响他们对他们认为应该包括在携带者筛查小组中的所有条件的看法。与会者看到了RGCS小组提供的选择和知识的价值。排除某些类型疾病的原因包括对生活质量的轻微影响以及对广泛筛查的社会影响的担忧。这项研究表明,未来的父母需要一种分层的RGCS方法,并能够选择筛查中包括的条件的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信