Adapting the Indigenous Three Sisters system to modern row cropping practices

IF 6.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Junxian Guo, Hannah Mooney, Peng Wu, Ernest Owusu-Sekyere, Kobby Acquah, Zhenyu Tang, Hunter Slobodian, Zach Yarechewski, Changjie Han, Panpan Yuan, Leno Guzman, Dustin Hoft, Ying Chen
{"title":"Adapting the Indigenous Three Sisters system to modern row cropping practices","authors":"Junxian Guo,&nbsp;Hannah Mooney,&nbsp;Peng Wu,&nbsp;Ernest Owusu-Sekyere,&nbsp;Kobby Acquah,&nbsp;Zhenyu Tang,&nbsp;Hunter Slobodian,&nbsp;Zach Yarechewski,&nbsp;Changjie Han,&nbsp;Panpan Yuan,&nbsp;Leno Guzman,&nbsp;Dustin Hoft,&nbsp;Ying Chen","doi":"10.1007/s13593-025-01041-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Indigenous companion planting technique known as the <i>Three Sisters</i> system improves soil health, weed control, and crop yields by combining mutually beneficial crops. However, existing research focuses on small-scale gardening, while modern agriculture’s reliance on large land and machinery makes the traditional garden-based approach impractical. This study is the first to explore the adaptation of the <i>Three Sisters</i> system to modern row-cropping practices. Two-year field experiments were conducted in Manitoba, Canada. The <i>Three Sisters</i> crops, sweet corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.), pole bean, and summer squash, were grown under four planting modes: corn monoculture, corn with bean companion, corn with bean and squash companion, and squash monoculture. Key measurements included soil moisture content, leaf area index, crop yield components, and soil nitrogen levels. Results showed that companion plots with two or three crops generally had lower soil moisture compared to monocultures, with squash monoculture plots retaining the most soil moisture. Among the companion plots, similar soil moisture levels indicated corn as the dominant water consumer. The leaf area index of squash monoculture plots increased rapidly in mid-season, with plots containing squash achieving the highest indices later in the season. Bean contributions to leaf area index were minimal due to corn canopy dominance during early growth stages and squash canopy dominance later. Monoculture plots produced higher individual crop yields, whereas companion planting offered greater produce diversity and a higher total yield of combined crops. The timing of bean planting had inconclusive effects on corn yields but consistently improved bean yields when delayed. Companion plots with three crops exhibited lower residual soil nitrogen, suggesting potential water quality benefits. This study offers guidance on adapting the traditional <i>Three Sisters</i> system to modern row-cropping practices, presenting a sustainable approach that balances agricultural productivity with ecological and human health benefits.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"45 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-025-01041-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Indigenous companion planting technique known as the Three Sisters system improves soil health, weed control, and crop yields by combining mutually beneficial crops. However, existing research focuses on small-scale gardening, while modern agriculture’s reliance on large land and machinery makes the traditional garden-based approach impractical. This study is the first to explore the adaptation of the Three Sisters system to modern row-cropping practices. Two-year field experiments were conducted in Manitoba, Canada. The Three Sisters crops, sweet corn (Zea mays L.), pole bean, and summer squash, were grown under four planting modes: corn monoculture, corn with bean companion, corn with bean and squash companion, and squash monoculture. Key measurements included soil moisture content, leaf area index, crop yield components, and soil nitrogen levels. Results showed that companion plots with two or three crops generally had lower soil moisture compared to monocultures, with squash monoculture plots retaining the most soil moisture. Among the companion plots, similar soil moisture levels indicated corn as the dominant water consumer. The leaf area index of squash monoculture plots increased rapidly in mid-season, with plots containing squash achieving the highest indices later in the season. Bean contributions to leaf area index were minimal due to corn canopy dominance during early growth stages and squash canopy dominance later. Monoculture plots produced higher individual crop yields, whereas companion planting offered greater produce diversity and a higher total yield of combined crops. The timing of bean planting had inconclusive effects on corn yields but consistently improved bean yields when delayed. Companion plots with three crops exhibited lower residual soil nitrogen, suggesting potential water quality benefits. This study offers guidance on adapting the traditional Three Sisters system to modern row-cropping practices, presenting a sustainable approach that balances agricultural productivity with ecological and human health benefits.

使土著三姐妹制度适应现代行种植做法
被称为三姐妹系统的土著伴生种植技术通过组合互利作物来改善土壤健康、杂草控制和作物产量。然而,现有的研究主要集中在小规模的园艺上,而现代农业对大片土地和机械的依赖使得传统的以花园为基础的方法不切实际。本研究首次探讨了三姐妹制度对现代种植方式的适应性。在加拿大马尼托巴省进行了为期两年的实地试验。三姐妹作物甜玉米(Zea mays L.)、扁豆和夏南瓜分别在玉米单作、玉米与豆类伴生、玉米与豆类和南瓜伴生、南瓜单作四种种植模式下种植。关键测量包括土壤水分含量、叶面积指数、作物产量成分和土壤氮水平。结果表明,与单一栽培相比,两种或三种作物伴生的土壤水分普遍较低,其中南瓜单一栽培的土壤水分保留最多。在伴生样地中,相似的土壤湿度水平表明玉米是主要的水分消耗者。南瓜单作地的叶面积指数在季中迅速上升,南瓜单作地的叶面积指数在季后期最高。由于早期玉米冠层优势和后期南瓜冠层优势,大豆对叶面积指数的贡献最小。单作地块单作作物产量较高,而伴作提供了更大的产品多样性和更高的组合作物总产量。大豆种植的时间对玉米产量没有决定性的影响,但延迟种植后大豆产量持续提高。三种作物伴生小区土壤残余氮含量较低,表明潜在的水质效益。这项研究为使传统的三姐妹系统适应现代的连作种植方式提供了指导,提出了一种平衡农业生产力与生态和人类健康效益的可持续方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信