{"title":"Intraoperative evaluation of bone resection accuracy in total knee arthroplasty using an augmented reality-based navigation system","authors":"Atsushi Sato, Masataka Ota, Toshiharu Miyazawa, Misako Takizawa, Reo Nagasaka, Marika Mukunoki, Kanako Izukashi, Jun Oike, Takayuki Okumo, Saki Yagura, Takayuki Koya, Koji Kanzaki","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-06033-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has seen growing adoption, with over 30% of primary TKA procedures in Japan using CAS as of 2021. Augmented reality (AR) navigation has emerged as a novel alternative, providing real-time visualization and high-precision guidance during surgery. However, standardized protocols, long-term outcomes, and quantitative accuracy data remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the intraoperative bone resection accuracy achieved with an AR-based navigation system during TKA.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed 100 knees that underwent primary TKA using the NextAR navigation system (Medacta International SA, Switzerland). Bone resection accuracy was assessed by comparing intraoperative cut angles and thicknesses to preoperative plans. Evaluated parameters included femoral coronal, sagittal, and rotational angles; distal and posterior resection thicknesses (medial/lateral); tibial coronal, posterior slope, and rotational angles; tibial resection thicknesses (medial/lateral); and implant size concordance.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean absolute differences from preoperative plans were as follows: femoral coronal angle 0.46° ± 0.48°, sagittal angle 0.72° ± 0.61°, and rotational angle 0.30° ± 0.33°; distal cut thickness 0.56 ± 0.46 mm (medial) and 0.54 ± 0.49 mm (lateral); posterior condyle cut thickness 0.23 ± 0.35 mm (medial) and 0.35 ± 0.44 mm (lateral). Tibial parameters showed coronal error of 0.64° ± 0.56°, posterior slope 0.66° ± 0.55°, and rotation 0.25° ± 0.60°; resection thickness 0.73 ± 0.69 mm (medial) and 0.79 ± 0.75 mm (lateral). Implant size matched 100% with preoperative planning.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The AR-based navigation system enabled precise three-dimensional intraoperative assessment and execution of bone resections in TKA. All angular and thickness errors remained within 1° and 1 mm, respectively, confirming high reproducibility and precision across multiple planes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-06033-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has seen growing adoption, with over 30% of primary TKA procedures in Japan using CAS as of 2021. Augmented reality (AR) navigation has emerged as a novel alternative, providing real-time visualization and high-precision guidance during surgery. However, standardized protocols, long-term outcomes, and quantitative accuracy data remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the intraoperative bone resection accuracy achieved with an AR-based navigation system during TKA.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 100 knees that underwent primary TKA using the NextAR navigation system (Medacta International SA, Switzerland). Bone resection accuracy was assessed by comparing intraoperative cut angles and thicknesses to preoperative plans. Evaluated parameters included femoral coronal, sagittal, and rotational angles; distal and posterior resection thicknesses (medial/lateral); tibial coronal, posterior slope, and rotational angles; tibial resection thicknesses (medial/lateral); and implant size concordance.
Results
Mean absolute differences from preoperative plans were as follows: femoral coronal angle 0.46° ± 0.48°, sagittal angle 0.72° ± 0.61°, and rotational angle 0.30° ± 0.33°; distal cut thickness 0.56 ± 0.46 mm (medial) and 0.54 ± 0.49 mm (lateral); posterior condyle cut thickness 0.23 ± 0.35 mm (medial) and 0.35 ± 0.44 mm (lateral). Tibial parameters showed coronal error of 0.64° ± 0.56°, posterior slope 0.66° ± 0.55°, and rotation 0.25° ± 0.60°; resection thickness 0.73 ± 0.69 mm (medial) and 0.79 ± 0.75 mm (lateral). Implant size matched 100% with preoperative planning.
Conclusion
The AR-based navigation system enabled precise three-dimensional intraoperative assessment and execution of bone resections in TKA. All angular and thickness errors remained within 1° and 1 mm, respectively, confirming high reproducibility and precision across multiple planes.
期刊介绍:
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance.
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).