Intraoperative evaluation of bone resection accuracy in total knee arthroplasty using an augmented reality-based navigation system

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Atsushi Sato, Masataka Ota, Toshiharu Miyazawa, Misako Takizawa, Reo Nagasaka, Marika Mukunoki, Kanako Izukashi, Jun Oike, Takayuki Okumo, Saki Yagura, Takayuki Koya, Koji Kanzaki
{"title":"Intraoperative evaluation of bone resection accuracy in total knee arthroplasty using an augmented reality-based navigation system","authors":"Atsushi Sato,&nbsp;Masataka Ota,&nbsp;Toshiharu Miyazawa,&nbsp;Misako Takizawa,&nbsp;Reo Nagasaka,&nbsp;Marika Mukunoki,&nbsp;Kanako Izukashi,&nbsp;Jun Oike,&nbsp;Takayuki Okumo,&nbsp;Saki Yagura,&nbsp;Takayuki Koya,&nbsp;Koji Kanzaki","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-06033-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has seen growing adoption, with over 30% of primary TKA procedures in Japan using CAS as of 2021. Augmented reality (AR) navigation has emerged as a novel alternative, providing real-time visualization and high-precision guidance during surgery. However, standardized protocols, long-term outcomes, and quantitative accuracy data remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the intraoperative bone resection accuracy achieved with an AR-based navigation system during TKA.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed 100 knees that underwent primary TKA using the NextAR navigation system (Medacta International SA, Switzerland). Bone resection accuracy was assessed by comparing intraoperative cut angles and thicknesses to preoperative plans. Evaluated parameters included femoral coronal, sagittal, and rotational angles; distal and posterior resection thicknesses (medial/lateral); tibial coronal, posterior slope, and rotational angles; tibial resection thicknesses (medial/lateral); and implant size concordance.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean absolute differences from preoperative plans were as follows: femoral coronal angle 0.46° ± 0.48°, sagittal angle 0.72° ± 0.61°, and rotational angle 0.30° ± 0.33°; distal cut thickness 0.56 ± 0.46 mm (medial) and 0.54 ± 0.49 mm (lateral); posterior condyle cut thickness 0.23 ± 0.35 mm (medial) and 0.35 ± 0.44 mm (lateral). Tibial parameters showed coronal error of 0.64° ± 0.56°, posterior slope 0.66° ± 0.55°, and rotation 0.25° ± 0.60°; resection thickness 0.73 ± 0.69 mm (medial) and 0.79 ± 0.75 mm (lateral). Implant size matched 100% with preoperative planning.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The AR-based navigation system enabled precise three-dimensional intraoperative assessment and execution of bone resections in TKA. All angular and thickness errors remained within 1° and 1 mm, respectively, confirming high reproducibility and precision across multiple planes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-06033-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has seen growing adoption, with over 30% of primary TKA procedures in Japan using CAS as of 2021. Augmented reality (AR) navigation has emerged as a novel alternative, providing real-time visualization and high-precision guidance during surgery. However, standardized protocols, long-term outcomes, and quantitative accuracy data remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the intraoperative bone resection accuracy achieved with an AR-based navigation system during TKA.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 100 knees that underwent primary TKA using the NextAR navigation system (Medacta International SA, Switzerland). Bone resection accuracy was assessed by comparing intraoperative cut angles and thicknesses to preoperative plans. Evaluated parameters included femoral coronal, sagittal, and rotational angles; distal and posterior resection thicknesses (medial/lateral); tibial coronal, posterior slope, and rotational angles; tibial resection thicknesses (medial/lateral); and implant size concordance.

Results

Mean absolute differences from preoperative plans were as follows: femoral coronal angle 0.46° ± 0.48°, sagittal angle 0.72° ± 0.61°, and rotational angle 0.30° ± 0.33°; distal cut thickness 0.56 ± 0.46 mm (medial) and 0.54 ± 0.49 mm (lateral); posterior condyle cut thickness 0.23 ± 0.35 mm (medial) and 0.35 ± 0.44 mm (lateral). Tibial parameters showed coronal error of 0.64° ± 0.56°, posterior slope 0.66° ± 0.55°, and rotation 0.25° ± 0.60°; resection thickness 0.73 ± 0.69 mm (medial) and 0.79 ± 0.75 mm (lateral). Implant size matched 100% with preoperative planning.

Conclusion

The AR-based navigation system enabled precise three-dimensional intraoperative assessment and execution of bone resections in TKA. All angular and thickness errors remained within 1° and 1 mm, respectively, confirming high reproducibility and precision across multiple planes.

术中使用增强现实导航系统评估全膝关节置换术中骨切除的准确性
计算机辅助手术(CAS)在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中的应用越来越广泛,截至2021年,日本超过30%的初级TKA手术使用CAS。增强现实(AR)导航已经成为一种新的选择,在手术过程中提供实时可视化和高精度指导。然而,标准化方案、长期结果和定量准确性数据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估术中基于ar的导航系统在TKA中实现的骨切除准确性。方法回顾性分析100例使用NextAR导航系统(Medacta International SA,瑞士)进行原发性全膝关节置换术的膝关节。通过比较术中切口的角度和厚度与术前的计划来评估骨切除的准确性。评估参数包括股骨冠状角、矢状角和旋转角;远端和后端切除厚度(内侧/外侧);胫骨冠状角、后斜角和旋转角;胫骨切除厚度(内侧/外侧);与种植体尺寸相符。结果与术前方案的平均绝对差异为:股冠状角0.46°±0.48°,矢状角0.72°±0.61°,旋转角0.30°±0.33°;远端切口厚度0.56±0.46 mm(内侧)和0.54±0.49 mm(外侧);后髁切口厚度0.23±0.35 mm(内侧)和0.35±0.44 mm(外侧)。胫骨参数冠状面误差0.64°±0.56°,后倾角0.66°±0.55°,旋转0.25°±0.60°;切除厚度0.73±0.69 mm(内侧)和0.79±0.75 mm(外侧)。种植体大小与术前计划匹配100%。结论基于ar的导航系统能够在TKA中对骨切除进行精确的三维术中评估和执行。所有角度和厚度误差分别保持在1°和1 mm以内,证实了跨多个平面的高再现性和精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信