Uncertainty quantification analysis of electrochemical reduction of CO2†

IF 3.1 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. K. Hariharan and Himanshu Goyal
{"title":"Uncertainty quantification analysis of electrochemical reduction of CO2†","authors":"R. K. Hariharan and Himanshu Goyal","doi":"10.1039/D4RE00610K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Electrochemical reduction of CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> is a promising technique for converting CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> to value-added products. However, a lack of quantitative understanding of how design and operating conditions impact a CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> electrolyzer's performance is a hurdle in its optimization and scale-up. In this context, mathematical modeling and simulations can play a significant role. However, the uncertainty in the model parameters poses a significant challenge. This uncertainty propagates to the model predictions, making the model validation difficult and reducing its utility. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is imperative in investigating the impact of various uncertainties in the model parameters on the model predictions. In this work, we develop a UQ framework for electrochemical reduction of CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>. To this end, a one-dimensional mathematical model is developed, and the model parameters' uncertainties are quantified and propagated through the model. The model predictions of partial current densities containing uncertainty are compared with experimental data. We show that the uncertainty in the kinetic parameters is essential to consider in the UQ analysis. This uncertainty arises from human bias, polarization technique, and the catalyst preparation method. Moreover, the uncertainty in the kinetic parameters can explain the deviations between the model predictions and experimental measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":101,"journal":{"name":"Reaction Chemistry & Engineering","volume":" 9","pages":" 2018-2029"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reaction Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/re/d4re00610k","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electrochemical reduction of CO2 is a promising technique for converting CO2 to value-added products. However, a lack of quantitative understanding of how design and operating conditions impact a CO2 electrolyzer's performance is a hurdle in its optimization and scale-up. In this context, mathematical modeling and simulations can play a significant role. However, the uncertainty in the model parameters poses a significant challenge. This uncertainty propagates to the model predictions, making the model validation difficult and reducing its utility. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is imperative in investigating the impact of various uncertainties in the model parameters on the model predictions. In this work, we develop a UQ framework for electrochemical reduction of CO2. To this end, a one-dimensional mathematical model is developed, and the model parameters' uncertainties are quantified and propagated through the model. The model predictions of partial current densities containing uncertainty are compared with experimental data. We show that the uncertainty in the kinetic parameters is essential to consider in the UQ analysis. This uncertainty arises from human bias, polarization technique, and the catalyst preparation method. Moreover, the uncertainty in the kinetic parameters can explain the deviations between the model predictions and experimental measurements.

Abstract Image

电化学还原CO2†的不确定度定量分析
电化学还原CO2是一种很有前途的将CO2转化为高附加值产品的技术。然而,缺乏对设计和操作条件如何影响CO2电解槽性能的定量理解是其优化和扩大的障碍。在这种情况下,数学建模和模拟可以发挥重要作用。然而,模型参数的不确定性给模型设计带来了巨大的挑战。这种不确定性会传播到模型预测中,使模型验证变得困难并降低其效用。在研究模型参数中各种不确定性对模型预测的影响时,不确定性量化是必不可少的。在这项工作中,我们开发了一个电化学还原二氧化碳的UQ框架。为此,建立了一维数学模型,对模型参数的不确定性进行量化,并通过模型进行传播。对含不确定性的局部电流密度的模型预测结果与实验数据进行了比较。我们表明,在UQ分析中,动力学参数的不确定性是必须考虑的。这种不确定性源于人为偏见、极化技术和催化剂制备方法。此外,动力学参数的不确定性可以解释模型预测与实验测量之间的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reaction Chemistry & Engineering
Reaction Chemistry & Engineering Chemistry-Chemistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
227
期刊介绍: Reaction Chemistry & Engineering is a new journal reporting cutting edge research into all aspects of making molecules for the benefit of fundamental research, applied processes and wider society. From fundamental, molecular-level chemistry to large scale chemical production, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering brings together communities of chemists and chemical engineers working to ensure the crucial role of reaction chemistry in today’s world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信