Industry Insights Into Kinematics and Injury Risk for Far-Side Occupants During Electric Vehicle Side Pole Impact Accidents

IF 10.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Fang Wang;Yuanpeng Lv;Chunguang Long;Lin Hu;Zhangchi Liu;Yu Liu;Zhou Zhou
{"title":"Industry Insights Into Kinematics and Injury Risk for Far-Side Occupants During Electric Vehicle Side Pole Impact Accidents","authors":"Fang Wang;Yuanpeng Lv;Chunguang Long;Lin Hu;Zhangchi Liu;Yu Liu;Zhou Zhou","doi":"10.1109/TCE.2025.3557871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the rapid growth in the number of electric vehicles equipped with advanced consumer electronics, the rate of impact accidents has also been rising year by year. Side pole impact tests are an important method for evaluating the collision safety of these modern electric vehicles. The purpose of this study is to gain industry insights into the kinematics and injury risk for far-side occupants in electric vehicle side pole impacts. This study uses a full-scale finite element model of an electric vehicle and a human body finite element model to conduct an in-depth analysis of the occupant’s kinematic response and the risk of injury to the head, neck, chest, and internal organs under various conditions by changing the relative position and impact angle between the rigid pole and the vehicle. The results show that the seatbelt fails to effectively restrict the upper body movement of the occupants, leading to the occupants slipping out of the seatbelt; the position of the impact significantly affects the injury risk to the occupants, with the highest probability of injury occurring during an A pillar impact and a lowest probability during a C pillar impact. In 28%–40% of the cases, the risk of far-side occupants sustaining serious head and brain abbreviated injury scale AIS 3+ injuries exceeds 40%, and in 22% of the cases, the probability of occupants sustaining diffuse axonal injuries based on which metric is higher than 40%; there is no correlation between the head injury criterion HIC15 and the impact angle, but a weak correlation exists between HIC15 and maximum principal strain (MPS); a strong positive correlation is found between the impact angle and brain injury criterion BrIC/MPS. The predicted MPS of nearly 40% and 80% of the far-side occupants’ anterior longitudinal ligament and posterior longitudinal ligament exceeds the injury threshold, respectively, while in all cases, the predicted MPS of the occupants’ capsular ligament and interspinous ligament exceeds the injury threshold, which indicates an extremely high risk of ligament injury. The peak strains of the internal organs of all far-side occupants exceed the threshold, indicating that the occurrence of these internal organ injuries mainly stems from a viscous mechanism, and the peak strains have a strong positive correlation with the impact angle.","PeriodicalId":13208,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics","volume":"71 2","pages":"2407-2420"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10949628/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rapid growth in the number of electric vehicles equipped with advanced consumer electronics, the rate of impact accidents has also been rising year by year. Side pole impact tests are an important method for evaluating the collision safety of these modern electric vehicles. The purpose of this study is to gain industry insights into the kinematics and injury risk for far-side occupants in electric vehicle side pole impacts. This study uses a full-scale finite element model of an electric vehicle and a human body finite element model to conduct an in-depth analysis of the occupant’s kinematic response and the risk of injury to the head, neck, chest, and internal organs under various conditions by changing the relative position and impact angle between the rigid pole and the vehicle. The results show that the seatbelt fails to effectively restrict the upper body movement of the occupants, leading to the occupants slipping out of the seatbelt; the position of the impact significantly affects the injury risk to the occupants, with the highest probability of injury occurring during an A pillar impact and a lowest probability during a C pillar impact. In 28%–40% of the cases, the risk of far-side occupants sustaining serious head and brain abbreviated injury scale AIS 3+ injuries exceeds 40%, and in 22% of the cases, the probability of occupants sustaining diffuse axonal injuries based on which metric is higher than 40%; there is no correlation between the head injury criterion HIC15 and the impact angle, but a weak correlation exists between HIC15 and maximum principal strain (MPS); a strong positive correlation is found between the impact angle and brain injury criterion BrIC/MPS. The predicted MPS of nearly 40% and 80% of the far-side occupants’ anterior longitudinal ligament and posterior longitudinal ligament exceeds the injury threshold, respectively, while in all cases, the predicted MPS of the occupants’ capsular ligament and interspinous ligament exceeds the injury threshold, which indicates an extremely high risk of ligament injury. The peak strains of the internal organs of all far-side occupants exceed the threshold, indicating that the occurrence of these internal organ injuries mainly stems from a viscous mechanism, and the peak strains have a strong positive correlation with the impact angle.
电动汽车侧杆碰撞事故中远侧乘员运动学和伤害风险的行业洞察
随着配备先进消费电子产品的电动汽车数量的快速增长,碰撞事故的发生率也在逐年上升。侧杆碰撞试验是评价现代电动汽车碰撞安全性的重要手段。本研究的目的是了解电动汽车侧杆碰撞对远侧乘员的运动学和伤害风险。本研究采用电动汽车全尺寸有限元模型和人体有限元模型,通过改变刚性杆与车辆的相对位置和冲击角度,深入分析各种情况下乘员的运动学响应以及对头颈部、胸部和内脏的损伤风险。结果表明:安全带不能有效限制乘员上半身的运动,导致乘员滑出安全带;撞击位置对乘员的伤害风险有显著影响,A柱撞击时发生伤害的概率最高,C柱撞击时发生伤害的概率最低。在28%-40%的病例中,远侧乘员发生严重头部和脑部AIS 3+损伤的风险超过40%,22%的病例中,乘员发生弥漫性轴索损伤的概率高于40%;头部损伤判据HIC15与撞击角度无相关性,但HIC15与最大主应变(MPS)有弱相关性;撞击角度与脑损伤标准BrIC/MPS之间存在很强的正相关。远侧乘员前纵韧带和后纵韧带的MPS预测值分别有近40%和80%超过损伤阈值,而乘员囊韧带和棘间韧带的MPS预测值均超过损伤阈值,表明其韧带损伤风险极高。所有远侧乘员的内脏峰值应变均超过阈值,说明这些内脏损伤的发生主要源于粘性机制,且峰值应变与撞击角度有较强的正相关关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.30%
发文量
59
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The main focus for the IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics is the engineering and research aspects of the theory, design, construction, manufacture or end use of mass market electronics, systems, software and services for consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信