Gender disparities in Chinese middle school science textbooks: A semiotic analysis

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES
Jialu Zhao , Christine Min Wotipka
{"title":"Gender disparities in Chinese middle school science textbooks: A semiotic analysis","authors":"Jialu Zhao ,&nbsp;Christine Min Wotipka","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gender representations in school textbooks can perpetuate biases or promote equity, influencing students' academic engagement and career aspirations. This is particularly important in China, where gender disparities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education present a complex picture that evolves from primary school to higher education. This study investigates gender representation in 149 human images from 12 Chinese middle school science textbooks. Unlike traditional quantitative methods, it employs a novel approach that combines a social semiotics framework with a large language model, enabling a deeper exploration of implicit gender biases in textbook content. The findings suggest an underrepresentation of females compared with males, as well as distinct gender differences in the role distribution of males and females. Findings from the analyses of interactive and compositional meanings further reveal gender differences but not always as expected. These results underscore the impact of cultural and educational norms on textbook content, showing that Chinese textbooks align with both traditional and changing gender norms. This study contributes to the academic discourse on gender bias in educational materials by highlighting the intersection of visual and textual gender representations. The paper concludes by suggesting areas for future research and ways to develop textbook content that fosters gender equality, potentially influencing future science curricula and policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 103192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539525001414","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gender representations in school textbooks can perpetuate biases or promote equity, influencing students' academic engagement and career aspirations. This is particularly important in China, where gender disparities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education present a complex picture that evolves from primary school to higher education. This study investigates gender representation in 149 human images from 12 Chinese middle school science textbooks. Unlike traditional quantitative methods, it employs a novel approach that combines a social semiotics framework with a large language model, enabling a deeper exploration of implicit gender biases in textbook content. The findings suggest an underrepresentation of females compared with males, as well as distinct gender differences in the role distribution of males and females. Findings from the analyses of interactive and compositional meanings further reveal gender differences but not always as expected. These results underscore the impact of cultural and educational norms on textbook content, showing that Chinese textbooks align with both traditional and changing gender norms. This study contributes to the academic discourse on gender bias in educational materials by highlighting the intersection of visual and textual gender representations. The paper concludes by suggesting areas for future research and ways to develop textbook content that fosters gender equality, potentially influencing future science curricula and policies.
中国中学科学教科书中的性别差异:符号学分析
学校教科书中的性别表现可能会延续偏见或促进公平,影响学生的学业参与和职业抱负。这在中国尤其重要,因为从小学到高等教育,科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教育中的性别差异呈现出一种复杂的局面。本研究调查了12本中国中学科学教科书中149幅人体图像的性别代表性。与传统的定量方法不同,它采用了一种新颖的方法,将社会符号学框架与大型语言模型相结合,从而能够更深入地探索教科书内容中的隐性性别偏见。研究结果表明,与男性相比,女性的代表性不足,男性和女性在角色分配上也存在明显的性别差异。互动意义和构成意义的分析结果进一步揭示了性别差异,但并不总是如预期的那样。这些结果强调了文化和教育规范对教科书内容的影响,表明中国教科书与传统和不断变化的性别规范保持一致。本研究通过强调视觉和文本性别表征的交集,为教材中性别偏见的学术论述做出了贡献。该论文最后提出了未来研究的领域和开发促进性别平等的教科书内容的方法,这可能会影响未来的科学课程和政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
63
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信