Current research trends in macro-level perspectives on loneliness in older adults

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Fredrica Nyqvist , Laura Coll-Planas , Joanna McHugh Power
{"title":"Current research trends in macro-level perspectives on loneliness in older adults","authors":"Fredrica Nyqvist ,&nbsp;Laura Coll-Planas ,&nbsp;Joanna McHugh Power","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this article, we review and categorize recent evidence exploring loneliness in older adults from a macro-level perspective to i) provide insights into current research and ii) propose future research directions. We categorize recent studies into three types: observational studies, intervention studies, and conceptual papers. Recent observational studies analyze loneliness using large European datasets such as SHARE, or harmonized datasets from other continents — mostly from a cross-sectional perspective, but also using longitudinal designs. In contrast, macro-level intervention studies are infrequent and mostly focused on the negative impact of COVID restrictive policies on loneliness. Current conceptual papers highlight the very need for macro-level perspectives and emphasize the importance of integrating these approaches into future research to more accurately identify etiological and sustaining factors shaping loneliness. Although macro-level causes of loneliness have been theoretically recognized, more empirical evidence confirming their role is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 101583"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154625001020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we review and categorize recent evidence exploring loneliness in older adults from a macro-level perspective to i) provide insights into current research and ii) propose future research directions. We categorize recent studies into three types: observational studies, intervention studies, and conceptual papers. Recent observational studies analyze loneliness using large European datasets such as SHARE, or harmonized datasets from other continents — mostly from a cross-sectional perspective, but also using longitudinal designs. In contrast, macro-level intervention studies are infrequent and mostly focused on the negative impact of COVID restrictive policies on loneliness. Current conceptual papers highlight the very need for macro-level perspectives and emphasize the importance of integrating these approaches into future research to more accurately identify etiological and sustaining factors shaping loneliness. Although macro-level causes of loneliness have been theoretically recognized, more empirical evidence confirming their role is needed.
老年人孤独感宏观层面的研究现状
在这篇文章中,我们从宏观的角度回顾和分类了最近关于老年人孤独的研究证据,以i)为当前的研究提供见解,ii)提出未来的研究方向。我们将最近的研究分为三种类型:观察性研究、干预研究和概念性论文。最近的观察性研究使用SHARE等大型欧洲数据集或来自其他大陆的统一数据集分析孤独感——主要是从横截面角度分析,但也使用纵向设计。相比之下,宏观层面的干预研究很少,而且主要集中在COVID限制政策对孤独感的负面影响上。目前的概念性论文强调了宏观层面视角的必要性,并强调了将这些方法整合到未来研究中的重要性,以更准确地识别形成孤独感的病因和持续因素。虽然孤独的宏观原因在理论上已经得到承认,但还需要更多的经验证据来证实它们的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信