Willingness to pay for and economic feasibility of solid waste management in Cape Maclear, Malawi

IF 6.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Elena Abgottspon, Jan Freihardt, Jakub Tkaczuk, Elizabeth Tilley
{"title":"Willingness to pay for and economic feasibility of solid waste management in Cape Maclear, Malawi","authors":"Elena Abgottspon,&nbsp;Jan Freihardt,&nbsp;Jakub Tkaczuk,&nbsp;Elizabeth Tilley","doi":"10.1016/j.rcradv.2025.200281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Improving solid waste management (SWM) can better public health locally and mitigate climate change globally. However, it requires thorough financing and business models. This study assessed the willingness to pay (WTP) of four stakeholder groups in the village Cape Maclear, Malawi, using the double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation method as well as direct questions. Households (N <span><math><mo>=</mo></math></span> 259) would be willing to pay an average of MWK 1507 (USD 0.90) per month if they did not have to separate their waste themselves, as opposed to MWK 899 (USD 0.54) per month if they had to separate their waste at the collection point. Lodges were willing to pay USD 13.00 per month for their own waste management and an additional USD 4.22 for public waste removal. The WTP of businesses was assumed to be zero due to an unrepresentative sample. Tourists were found to have an average WTP of USD 1.75 per day. We recommend a sustainable business model based on all cost and revenue streams of the system. Thereby, tourists show the greatest potential. Nevertheless, it is recommended to make the monthly operation of the system independent from external sources, but to use these sources for long-term investments and infrastructure improvements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74689,"journal":{"name":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 200281"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667378925000380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving solid waste management (SWM) can better public health locally and mitigate climate change globally. However, it requires thorough financing and business models. This study assessed the willingness to pay (WTP) of four stakeholder groups in the village Cape Maclear, Malawi, using the double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation method as well as direct questions. Households (N = 259) would be willing to pay an average of MWK 1507 (USD 0.90) per month if they did not have to separate their waste themselves, as opposed to MWK 899 (USD 0.54) per month if they had to separate their waste at the collection point. Lodges were willing to pay USD 13.00 per month for their own waste management and an additional USD 4.22 for public waste removal. The WTP of businesses was assumed to be zero due to an unrepresentative sample. Tourists were found to have an average WTP of USD 1.75 per day. We recommend a sustainable business model based on all cost and revenue streams of the system. Thereby, tourists show the greatest potential. Nevertheless, it is recommended to make the monthly operation of the system independent from external sources, but to use these sources for long-term investments and infrastructure improvements.
马拉维麦克利尔角固体废物管理的支付意愿和经济可行性
改善固体废物管理可以改善地方公共卫生,减缓全球气候变化。然而,这需要彻底的融资和商业模式。本研究评估了马拉维麦克利尔角村四个利益相关者群体的支付意愿(WTP),采用双界二分类选择或有估值法以及直接问题。259户家庭如果不需要自己分类垃圾,每月平均愿意支付1507新西兰元(0.90美元),而如果他们必须在收集点分类垃圾,每月平均愿意支付899新西兰元(0.54美元)。旅馆愿意为自己的废物管理每月支付13.00美元,为公共废物清除额外支付4.22美元。由于样本不具代表性,假设企业的WTP为零。游客平均每天的WTP为1.75美元。我们建议基于系统的所有成本和收入流的可持续商业模式。因此,游客显示出最大的潜力。尽管如此,建议使系统的每月运行独立于外部来源,但将这些来源用于长期投资和基础设施改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources, conservation & recycling advances
Resources, conservation & recycling advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信