Resistance training performed in the fasted state compared to the fed state on body composition and strength in adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis

IF 1.4 Q3 REHABILITATION
Alexandra Ferreira Vieira, Eduarda Blanco-Rambo, Rodrigo Cauduro Oliveira Macedo, Eduardo Lusa Cadore
{"title":"Resistance training performed in the fasted state compared to the fed state on body composition and strength in adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis","authors":"Alexandra Ferreira Vieira,&nbsp;Eduarda Blanco-Rambo,&nbsp;Rodrigo Cauduro Oliveira Macedo,&nbsp;Eduardo Lusa Cadore","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Fasting has been used as a strategy to promote reduction in body fat and enhance adaptations to physical training, but there is no consensus in the literature regarding the effects of resistance training when sessions are performed while fasting. The aim was to systematically review the effects of resistance training performed in the fasted state on body composition and physical performance.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We included clinical trials that comparing resistance training performed in fasted state <em>versus</em> fed state on fat free mass, body fat mass, muscle hypertrophy and strength in adults. The search was performed using databases, gray literature and manual search. Methodological quality was assessed using the risk of bias tool for randomized trials. The pooled effect estimates were computed from the standardized mean difference and the 95 % confidence interval using random effects models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four studies were included, three of which were assessed as having high risk of bias. No significant differences were found between fasted and fed states in fat free mass (SMD: 0.529; 95 % CI: −0.801 to 1.859; p = 0.436), muscle hypertrophy (SMD: 0.645; 95 % CI: −0.753 to 2.042; p = 0.366), or strength (SMD: 0.415; 95 % CI: −0.399 to 1.228; p = 0.318). However, the fasted state was associated with greater changes in body fat mass (SMD: −1.001; 95 % CI: −1.970 to −0.032; p = 0.043).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Resistance training performed in fasted and fed states appears to have similar effects on body composition, muscle hypertrophy and strength, particularly when sessions follow an overnight fast.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"45 ","pages":"Pages 99-109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225003043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Fasting has been used as a strategy to promote reduction in body fat and enhance adaptations to physical training, but there is no consensus in the literature regarding the effects of resistance training when sessions are performed while fasting. The aim was to systematically review the effects of resistance training performed in the fasted state on body composition and physical performance.

Method

We included clinical trials that comparing resistance training performed in fasted state versus fed state on fat free mass, body fat mass, muscle hypertrophy and strength in adults. The search was performed using databases, gray literature and manual search. Methodological quality was assessed using the risk of bias tool for randomized trials. The pooled effect estimates were computed from the standardized mean difference and the 95 % confidence interval using random effects models.

Results

Four studies were included, three of which were assessed as having high risk of bias. No significant differences were found between fasted and fed states in fat free mass (SMD: 0.529; 95 % CI: −0.801 to 1.859; p = 0.436), muscle hypertrophy (SMD: 0.645; 95 % CI: −0.753 to 2.042; p = 0.366), or strength (SMD: 0.415; 95 % CI: −0.399 to 1.228; p = 0.318). However, the fasted state was associated with greater changes in body fat mass (SMD: −1.001; 95 % CI: −1.970 to −0.032; p = 0.043).

Conclusion

Resistance training performed in fasted and fed states appears to have similar effects on body composition, muscle hypertrophy and strength, particularly when sessions follow an overnight fast.
在禁食状态下与进食状态下进行的阻力训练对成年人身体成分和力量的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
禁食已被用作一种促进体脂减少和增强体能训练适应性的策略,但关于在禁食期间进行阻力训练的效果,文献中尚无共识。目的是系统地回顾在禁食状态下进行的阻力训练对身体成分和身体表现的影响。方法我们纳入临床试验,比较在禁食状态和进食状态下进行的阻力训练对成人无脂量、体脂量、肌肉肥大和力量的影响。检索采用数据库、灰色文献和手工检索。使用随机试验的偏倚风险工具评估方法学质量。使用随机效应模型从标准化平均差和95%置信区间计算合并效应估计。结果纳入4项研究,其中3项被评估为具有高偏倚风险。在无脂肪量(SMD: 0.529; 95% CI: - 0.801至1.859;p = 0.436)、肌肉肥大(SMD: 0.645; 95% CI: - 0.753至2.042;p = 0.366)或力量(SMD: 0.415; 95% CI: - 0.399至1.228;p = 0.318)方面,禁食状态和进食状态之间没有显著差异。然而,禁食状态与体脂量的较大变化相关(SMD: - 1.001; 95% CI: - 1.970至- 0.032;p = 0.043)。结论:在禁食和进食状态下进行的阻力训练似乎对身体成分、肌肉肥大和力量有相似的影响,特别是在禁食一晚后进行的训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信