Progress and inequality in cervical cancer screening in Lesotho (2009–2024): Decomposing within- and between-group inequality

SSM - Health Systems Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100120
Denis Okova , Plaxcedes Chiwire , Akim Tafadzwa Lukwa
{"title":"Progress and inequality in cervical cancer screening in Lesotho (2009–2024): Decomposing within- and between-group inequality","authors":"Denis Okova ,&nbsp;Plaxcedes Chiwire ,&nbsp;Akim Tafadzwa Lukwa","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cervical cancer is a preventable and treatable disease, yet it remains a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality among women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Lesotho. Despite its high cervical cancer burden, Lesotho’s cervical cancer screenings (CCS) rates are still low. This study examines trends in CCS uptake over 15 years and evaluates socioeconomic and geographic disparities using data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from nationally representative Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in 2009, 2014, and 2023/24 were analysed to assess CCS trends among women aged 15–49 years. Lifetime and past-year CCS prevalence were the primary outcomes. Inequalities were quantified using the Erreygers Normalized Concentration Index (ENCI) and Theil index to measure and decompose disparities by socioeconomic status (SES) and place of residence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Lifetime CCS prevalence increased significantly from 6 % in 2009 to 21 % in 2023/24, while past-year screening prevalence rose from 2 % to 9 %. Socioeconomic and rural-urban disparities decreased substantially, with past-year screening among the poorest women achieving near-equity by 2023/24. However, lifetime CCS continued to show slight pro-wealthy and urban biases. The reducing overall inequalities were due to the near elimination of between-group inequalities. However, within-group disparities remained significant, highlighting heterogeneity in access barriers within SES and residence groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Lesotho has made significant progress in CCS uptake, driven by targeted public health interventions and equity-focused strategies. However, persistent barriers and within-group disparities underscore the need for systemic reforms, including transitioning to organized screening programs, scaling up the integration of CCS with HIV care, and addressing structural and sociocultural barriers to achieve universal and equitable screening access.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM - Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949856225000728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cervical cancer is a preventable and treatable disease, yet it remains a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality among women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Lesotho. Despite its high cervical cancer burden, Lesotho’s cervical cancer screenings (CCS) rates are still low. This study examines trends in CCS uptake over 15 years and evaluates socioeconomic and geographic disparities using data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS).

Methods

Data from nationally representative Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in 2009, 2014, and 2023/24 were analysed to assess CCS trends among women aged 15–49 years. Lifetime and past-year CCS prevalence were the primary outcomes. Inequalities were quantified using the Erreygers Normalized Concentration Index (ENCI) and Theil index to measure and decompose disparities by socioeconomic status (SES) and place of residence.

Results

Lifetime CCS prevalence increased significantly from 6 % in 2009 to 21 % in 2023/24, while past-year screening prevalence rose from 2 % to 9 %. Socioeconomic and rural-urban disparities decreased substantially, with past-year screening among the poorest women achieving near-equity by 2023/24. However, lifetime CCS continued to show slight pro-wealthy and urban biases. The reducing overall inequalities were due to the near elimination of between-group inequalities. However, within-group disparities remained significant, highlighting heterogeneity in access barriers within SES and residence groups.

Conclusion

Lesotho has made significant progress in CCS uptake, driven by targeted public health interventions and equity-focused strategies. However, persistent barriers and within-group disparities underscore the need for systemic reforms, including transitioning to organized screening programs, scaling up the integration of CCS with HIV care, and addressing structural and sociocultural barriers to achieve universal and equitable screening access.
莱索托宫颈癌筛查的进展和不平等(2009-2024年):分解群体内部和群体之间的不平等
宫颈癌是一种可预防和可治疗的疾病,但它仍然是包括莱索托在内的中低收入国家(LMICs)妇女癌症相关发病率和死亡率的主要原因。尽管莱索托的宫颈癌负担很高,但其宫颈癌筛查率仍然很低。本研究考察了15年来CCS吸收的趋势,并利用人口与健康调查(DHS)的数据评估了社会经济和地理差异。方法分析2009年、2014年和2023/24年进行的具有全国代表性的人口与健康调查数据,评估15-49岁女性的CCS趋势。一生和过去一年的CCS患病率是主要结局。采用Erreygers归一化浓度指数(ENCI)和Theil指数对不平等进行量化,以社会经济地位(SES)和居住地衡量和分解差异。结果终生CCS患病率由2009年的6 %上升至2023/24年的21 %,而过去一年的筛查患病率由2 %上升至9 %。社会经济和城乡差距大幅缩小,到2023/24年,过去一年对最贫困妇女的筛查接近平等。然而,终生CCS继续显示出轻微的亲富人和城市偏见。总体不平等的减少是由于几乎消除了群体之间的不平等。然而,群体内的差异仍然很大,突出了SES和居住群体之间获取障碍的异质性。结论在有针对性的公共卫生干预措施和注重公平的战略的推动下,莱索托在碳捕集和封存方面取得了重大进展。然而,持续存在的障碍和群体内部差异凸显了系统性改革的必要性,包括向有组织的筛查项目过渡,扩大CCS与艾滋病毒护理的整合,以及解决结构性和社会文化障碍,以实现普遍和公平的筛查机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书