Evaluating digital intervention approaches for supporting immigrant women with intimate partner violence experiences: Findings from the It's weWomen plus sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART)
Bushra Sabri , Jian Li , Subhash Aryal , Theresa Mata , Sarah M. Murray , Nancy Glass , Jacquelyn C. Campbell
{"title":"Evaluating digital intervention approaches for supporting immigrant women with intimate partner violence experiences: Findings from the It's weWomen plus sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART)","authors":"Bushra Sabri , Jian Li , Subhash Aryal , Theresa Mata , Sarah M. Murray , Nancy Glass , Jacquelyn C. Campbell","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intimate partner violence (IPV) disproportionately affects immigrant women, who often face barriers to accessing in-person services. Digital interventions offer a promising alternative by providing tailored, remote support.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this SMART trial, 1265 foreign-born immigrant women across the U.S. were randomized to a personalized online (<em>n</em> = 660) or standard online safety information (<em>n</em> = 605) intervention. At 3 months, low responders (<em>n</em> = 366) were re-randomized to receive text-only (<em>n</em> = 183) or text + phone support (<em>n</em> = 183). Outcomes were assessed at 6 and 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All groups showed reduced physical and sexual IPV over time, with no significant differences between first-stage conditions. Low responders in the text + phone group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in physical and sexual IPV (<em>d</em> = −0.25, <em>p</em> < 0.01), depression (<em>d</em> = −0.22, <em>p</em> < 0.01), and increased empowerment (<em>d</em> = 0.22, <em>p</em> < 0.01), from 3 to 12 months, compared to responders. These between-group effects were supported by significant within-group improvements, with the text + phone group narrowing or closing the gap with responders in most outcomes by 12 months. Among low responders initially assigned to the personalized online intervention, those re-randomized to text + phone support outperformed those receiving text-only support—showing significantly greater reductions in IPV (<em>d</em> = −0.32, <em>p</em> < 0.05), depression (<em>d</em> = −0.33, <em>p</em> < 0.05), and greater gains in empowerment (<em>d</em> = 0.27, <em>p</em> < 0.05). The text-only group also improved, particularly in depression and PTSD, with outcomes approaching those of responders by 12 months. Across conditions, low responders also showed substantial improvements in safety behaviors (<em>d</em> = 0.24–0.25; <em>p</em> < 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings highlight the value of stepped-care, adaptive approaches in addressing persistent IPV-related needs. Integrating personalized phone support into digital interventions can enhance outcomes for survivors who do not respond to brief, initial support alone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 101539"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865425001139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Intimate partner violence (IPV) disproportionately affects immigrant women, who often face barriers to accessing in-person services. Digital interventions offer a promising alternative by providing tailored, remote support.
Methods
In this SMART trial, 1265 foreign-born immigrant women across the U.S. were randomized to a personalized online (n = 660) or standard online safety information (n = 605) intervention. At 3 months, low responders (n = 366) were re-randomized to receive text-only (n = 183) or text + phone support (n = 183). Outcomes were assessed at 6 and 12 months.
Results
All groups showed reduced physical and sexual IPV over time, with no significant differences between first-stage conditions. Low responders in the text + phone group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in physical and sexual IPV (d = −0.25, p < 0.01), depression (d = −0.22, p < 0.01), and increased empowerment (d = 0.22, p < 0.01), from 3 to 12 months, compared to responders. These between-group effects were supported by significant within-group improvements, with the text + phone group narrowing or closing the gap with responders in most outcomes by 12 months. Among low responders initially assigned to the personalized online intervention, those re-randomized to text + phone support outperformed those receiving text-only support—showing significantly greater reductions in IPV (d = −0.32, p < 0.05), depression (d = −0.33, p < 0.05), and greater gains in empowerment (d = 0.27, p < 0.05). The text-only group also improved, particularly in depression and PTSD, with outcomes approaching those of responders by 12 months. Across conditions, low responders also showed substantial improvements in safety behaviors (d = 0.24–0.25; p < 0.05).
Conclusion
These findings highlight the value of stepped-care, adaptive approaches in addressing persistent IPV-related needs. Integrating personalized phone support into digital interventions can enhance outcomes for survivors who do not respond to brief, initial support alone.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is an international peer reviewed open access journal that publishes articles pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, life science, pharmaceutical science, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioral science, and bioethics. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is unique in that it is outside the confines of disease specifications, and it strives to increase the transparency of medical research and reduce publication bias by publishing scientifically valid original research findings irrespective of their perceived importance, significance or impact. Both randomized and non-randomized trials are within the scope of the Journal. Some common topics include trial design rationale and methods, operational methodologies and challenges, and positive and negative trial results. In addition to original research, the Journal also welcomes other types of communications including, but are not limited to, methodology reviews, perspectives and discussions. Through timely dissemination of advances in clinical trials, the goal of Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is to serve as a platform to enhance the communication and collaboration within the global clinical trials community that ultimately advances this field of research for the benefit of patients.