Facility-Level Variation Underlying Low Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval in the United States.

Premal Trivedi, Lei Wang, Evan Carey, Richard Lindrooth, Maria Puello Baron, Jonathan Lindquist, P Michael Ho
{"title":"Facility-Level Variation Underlying Low Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval in the United States.","authors":"Premal Trivedi, Lei Wang, Evan Carey, Richard Lindrooth, Maria Puello Baron, Jonathan Lindquist, P Michael Ho","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Timely retrieval of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters is recommended to reduce complications and optimize outcomes. This study aims to quantify facility-level variation in risk-adjusted IVC filter retrieval across US hospitals and to identify patient- and hospital-level factors associated with nonretrieval.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medicare beneficiaries undergoing IVC filter implantation were identified in the 100% claims files for years 2016 to 2020. Facility-level variation in device retrieval was quantified using Bayesian hospital profiling. Patient- and hospital-level factors associated with nonretrieval were assessed using logistic regression, adjusting for diagnostic indication, comorbidities, and implantation year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IVC filters were implanted in 119,613 Medicare beneficiaries across 2,485 facilities. Retrieval rates were low: median 6.2% within 3 months and 14.8% within 1 year. Excluding deaths within 3 months (30.2%), retrieval ranged from 0% to 100% across facilities. Among high-volume hospitals (top 25th percentile, implanting ≥13 filters per year), 1-year risk-adjusted retrieval ranged from 0% to 74.5%, mean 20% ± 14.2% (positive skew 0.95). Patient factors associated with IVC filter nonretrieval included age > 80 years (odds ratio 2.98, 95% confidence interval [2.73-3.24]), Black race (1.62, [1.51-1.72]), and Hispanic ethnicity (1.45, [1.16-1.80]). Among hospital factors, nonteaching (1.45 [1.37-1.53]), small bed size (1.37 [1.24-1.50]), and safety-net (1.42 [1.34-1.50]) facilities were strongly associated with IVC filter nonretrieval.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>High mortality within 3 months of IVC filter implantation suggests opportunity to improve patient selection and, potentially, device type choice. There is large facility-level variance underlying low aggregate IVC filter retrieval nationally; a focus on standardizing device surveillance and identifying best practices from high-performing facilities is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2025.08.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Timely retrieval of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters is recommended to reduce complications and optimize outcomes. This study aims to quantify facility-level variation in risk-adjusted IVC filter retrieval across US hospitals and to identify patient- and hospital-level factors associated with nonretrieval.

Methods: Medicare beneficiaries undergoing IVC filter implantation were identified in the 100% claims files for years 2016 to 2020. Facility-level variation in device retrieval was quantified using Bayesian hospital profiling. Patient- and hospital-level factors associated with nonretrieval were assessed using logistic regression, adjusting for diagnostic indication, comorbidities, and implantation year.

Results: IVC filters were implanted in 119,613 Medicare beneficiaries across 2,485 facilities. Retrieval rates were low: median 6.2% within 3 months and 14.8% within 1 year. Excluding deaths within 3 months (30.2%), retrieval ranged from 0% to 100% across facilities. Among high-volume hospitals (top 25th percentile, implanting ≥13 filters per year), 1-year risk-adjusted retrieval ranged from 0% to 74.5%, mean 20% ± 14.2% (positive skew 0.95). Patient factors associated with IVC filter nonretrieval included age > 80 years (odds ratio 2.98, 95% confidence interval [2.73-3.24]), Black race (1.62, [1.51-1.72]), and Hispanic ethnicity (1.45, [1.16-1.80]). Among hospital factors, nonteaching (1.45 [1.37-1.53]), small bed size (1.37 [1.24-1.50]), and safety-net (1.42 [1.34-1.50]) facilities were strongly associated with IVC filter nonretrieval.

Discussion: High mortality within 3 months of IVC filter implantation suggests opportunity to improve patient selection and, potentially, device type choice. There is large facility-level variance underlying low aggregate IVC filter retrieval nationally; a focus on standardizing device surveillance and identifying best practices from high-performing facilities is warranted.

在美国,低下腔静脉过滤器检索的设施水平变化。
目的:建议及时取出下腔静脉(IVC)滤器,减少并发症,优化预后。本研究旨在量化美国各医院风险调整后IVC滤器回收的设施水平差异,并确定与非回收相关的患者和医院水平因素。方法:在2016-2020年100%的索赔档案中确定接受IVC过滤器植入的医疗保险受益人。使用贝叶斯医院分析量化设备检索的设施水平变化。采用逻辑回归方法评估患者和医院层面与不回收相关的因素,调整诊断指征、合并症和植入年份。结果:IVC过滤器植入119,613医疗保险受益人在2485个设施。检索率低:3个月内中位数为6.2%,1年内中位数为14.8%。不包括3个月内的死亡(30.2%),各设施的回收率从0-100%不等。在大容量医院(前25%,植入≥13个过滤器/年)中,1年风险校正检索范围为0-74.5%,平均值为20% +/- 14.2%(正偏度0.95)。与IVC滤镜未取回相关的患者因素包括:年龄100 - 80岁(OR 2.98, 95% CI[2.73-3.24])、黑人(1.62,[1.51-1.72])和西班牙裔(1.45,[1.16-1.80])。在医院因素中,非教学设施(1.45[1.37-1.53])、小床位(1.37[1.24-1.50])和安全网(1.42[1.34-1.50])设施与IVC滤器未取物密切相关。讨论:IVC过滤器植入3个月内的高死亡率提示有机会改善患者选择,并可能改善设备类型的选择。在全国范围内,总体IVC滤波检索较低的基础上存在较大的设施水平差异;将重点放在设备监控的标准化上,并从高性能设施中确定最佳实践是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信