Improving Standardization of Care Using the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Calculation Tool

IF 1.5
Jillian Jemison, Tracy Brown, Nadia Pile
{"title":"Improving Standardization of Care Using the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Calculation Tool","authors":"Jillian Jemison,&nbsp;Tracy Brown,&nbsp;Nadia Pile","doi":"10.1016/j.nwh.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To standardize care by implementing the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) calculation tool in clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Quality improvement project guided by the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle.</div></div><div><h3>Setting/Local Problem</h3><div>Two outpatient obstetrics and gynecology clinics with need for a standardized process for potential VBAC candidates.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions/Measurements</h3><div>A standardized process was developed using the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network VBAC calculation tool to promote shared decision-making. This process includes interventions aimed at training 100% of perinatal providers and ensuring that providers counsel 90% of women with a previous cesarean birth on birth mode options at the initial prenatal visit, use the tool before the 28-week prenatal visit, and provide counseling on scores to 90% of potential VBAC candidates. Success was measured by assessing the percentage of individuals meeting each intervention target.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All seven providers received training. Birth mode options were discussed with 34 of 38 women (89.5%) with a previous cesarean at the initial prenatal visit. Of 22 women interested in a VBAC, 90.9% (<em>n</em> = 20) had predicted success scores calculated and documented, with all but 1 assessed before the 28-week prenatal visit due to a transfer into the practice at the 29-week prenatal visit. Of the 20 women counseled, 95% (<em>n</em> = 19) had their scores discussed. After counseling, 16 women opted to pursue a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). Birth outcomes included nine repeated cesarean births for various reasons, two failed TOLACs, and one successful VBAC. Outcomes for four women are still pending at the time of this writing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>An improvement in standardization of care surrounding counseling VBAC candidates was observed after implementation of this quality improvement project. Adherence to screening and discussion of birth mode options for women who had a previous cesarean birth demonstrates the clinics’ commitment to delivering evidence-based care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39985,"journal":{"name":"Nursing for Women''s Health","volume":"29 5","pages":"Pages 293-300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing for Women''s Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751485125001436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To standardize care by implementing the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) calculation tool in clinical practice.

Design

Quality improvement project guided by the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle.

Setting/Local Problem

Two outpatient obstetrics and gynecology clinics with need for a standardized process for potential VBAC candidates.

Interventions/Measurements

A standardized process was developed using the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network VBAC calculation tool to promote shared decision-making. This process includes interventions aimed at training 100% of perinatal providers and ensuring that providers counsel 90% of women with a previous cesarean birth on birth mode options at the initial prenatal visit, use the tool before the 28-week prenatal visit, and provide counseling on scores to 90% of potential VBAC candidates. Success was measured by assessing the percentage of individuals meeting each intervention target.

Results

All seven providers received training. Birth mode options were discussed with 34 of 38 women (89.5%) with a previous cesarean at the initial prenatal visit. Of 22 women interested in a VBAC, 90.9% (n = 20) had predicted success scores calculated and documented, with all but 1 assessed before the 28-week prenatal visit due to a transfer into the practice at the 29-week prenatal visit. Of the 20 women counseled, 95% (n = 19) had their scores discussed. After counseling, 16 women opted to pursue a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). Birth outcomes included nine repeated cesarean births for various reasons, two failed TOLACs, and one successful VBAC. Outcomes for four women are still pending at the time of this writing.

Conclusion

An improvement in standardization of care surrounding counseling VBAC candidates was observed after implementation of this quality improvement project. Adherence to screening and discussion of birth mode options for women who had a previous cesarean birth demonstrates the clinics’ commitment to delivering evidence-based care.
利用母胎医学单位网络剖宫产后阴道分娩计算工具提高护理规范化。
目的:在临床实践中实施母胎医学单位网络剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)计算工具,以规范护理。设计:以计划-执行-研究-行动循环为指导的质量改进项目。环境/当地问题:两家门诊妇产科诊所需要对潜在的VBAC候选人进行标准化流程。干预/测量:使用母胎医学单位网络VBAC计算工具制定了标准化流程,以促进共同决策。这一过程包括旨在培训100%围产期提供者的干预措施,并确保提供者在初次产前检查时向90%曾经剖腹产的妇女提供有关分娩方式选择的咨询,在28周产前检查前使用该工具,并向90%的潜在VBAC候选人提供分数咨询。通过评估达到每个干预目标的个人百分比来衡量成功。结果:7名医务人员均接受了培训。在最初的产前检查中,38名有过剖宫产史的妇女中有34名(89.5%)讨论了分娩方式的选择。在22名对VBAC感兴趣的妇女中,90.9% (n = 20)的预测成功得分被计算并记录下来,除了1人之外,所有人都在28周产前检查之前进行了评估,因为在29周产前检查时转移到了实践中。在接受咨询的20名女性中,95% (n = 19)的得分得到了讨论。在咨询后,16名妇女选择进行剖宫产后分娩试验(TOLAC)。分娩结果包括9例因各种原因重复剖腹产,2例tolac失败,1例VBAC成功。在撰写本文时,四名妇女的结果仍未确定。结论:实施该质量改善项目后,VBAC考生辅导护理的规范化程度有所提高。坚持筛查和讨论分娩方式选择的妇女谁曾有过剖宫产表明诊所的承诺,提供循证护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing for Women''s Health
Nursing for Women''s Health Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Nursing for Women"s Health publishes the most recent and compelling health care information on women"s health, newborn care and professional nursing issues. As a refereed, clinical practice journal, it provides professionals involved in providing optimum nursing care for women and their newborns with health care trends and everyday issues in a concise, practical, and easy-to-read format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信