Komal Abdul Rahim, Kantesh Kumar, Aiman Arif, Kinzah Razzak Ghazi, Saad Bin Zafar Mahmood, Saqib Kamran Bakhshi, Mushayda Ali, Zainab Samad, Adil Haider
{"title":"Does Time Matter? Impact of Residency Start Month on EGS Outcome in Pakistan.","authors":"Komal Abdul Rahim, Kantesh Kumar, Aiman Arif, Kinzah Razzak Ghazi, Saad Bin Zafar Mahmood, Saqib Kamran Bakhshi, Mushayda Ali, Zainab Samad, Adil Haider","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trainee turnover in hospitals with induction of new, less experienced residents and changeover in the clinical teams has been considered an essential factor for increased morbidity and mortality. In high-income countries (HICs), this is known as the July effect-the time for new inductees. We aim to study the January effect (time of new inductees in our setting) and patient outcomes in an Emergency General Surgery (EGS) cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used secondary data from adult patients with EGS diagnosis from a tertiary care center in Pakistan (2010-2019). The outcomes of interest were severe adverse events (SAEs), inpatient mortality, length of stay [LOS], and failure to rescue (FTR). Multiple logistic and linear regressions was performed to assess their association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 32,280 patients analyzed, 7.94% were admitted in January. There was significantly higher elective admission (61.06% vs. 53.51%) and surgical interventions (74.80% vs. 72.92%) in January compared to other months. Inpatient mortality, SAEs, FTRs, and LOS did not significantly differ between the two groups. Multivariable analysis showed no significant association of January admission with SAE (AOR 1.06; 95% CI 0.97-1.16), inpatient mortality (AOR 1.09; 95% CI 0.83-1.43), FTR (AOR 1.04; 95% CI 0.78-1.38), and LOS (β 0.12; 95% CI -0.05-0.29).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the study, which has no evidence of the January effect for EGS patients, suggest that this effect is not universally applicable, necessitating context-specific evaluation to understand the temporal trends in the overall health outcomes of the admitted patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2752-2759"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Trainee turnover in hospitals with induction of new, less experienced residents and changeover in the clinical teams has been considered an essential factor for increased morbidity and mortality. In high-income countries (HICs), this is known as the July effect-the time for new inductees. We aim to study the January effect (time of new inductees in our setting) and patient outcomes in an Emergency General Surgery (EGS) cohort.
Methods: We used secondary data from adult patients with EGS diagnosis from a tertiary care center in Pakistan (2010-2019). The outcomes of interest were severe adverse events (SAEs), inpatient mortality, length of stay [LOS], and failure to rescue (FTR). Multiple logistic and linear regressions was performed to assess their association.
Results: Of the 32,280 patients analyzed, 7.94% were admitted in January. There was significantly higher elective admission (61.06% vs. 53.51%) and surgical interventions (74.80% vs. 72.92%) in January compared to other months. Inpatient mortality, SAEs, FTRs, and LOS did not significantly differ between the two groups. Multivariable analysis showed no significant association of January admission with SAE (AOR 1.06; 95% CI 0.97-1.16), inpatient mortality (AOR 1.09; 95% CI 0.83-1.43), FTR (AOR 1.04; 95% CI 0.78-1.38), and LOS (β 0.12; 95% CI -0.05-0.29).
Conclusion: The results of the study, which has no evidence of the January effect for EGS patients, suggest that this effect is not universally applicable, necessitating context-specific evaluation to understand the temporal trends in the overall health outcomes of the admitted patients.
背景:医院的见习人员更替与新入职经验不足的住院医生和临床团队的转换被认为是发病率和死亡率增加的重要因素。在高收入国家(HICs),这被称为“七月效应”——新人入选者的时间。我们的目的是研究急诊普通外科(EGS)队列中的1月份效应(我们设置的新入组时间)和患者预后。方法:我们使用了来自巴基斯坦一家三级医疗中心(2010-2019)诊断为EGS的成年患者的二次数据。我们关注的结果是严重不良事件(sae)、住院死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和抢救失败(FTR)。采用多元逻辑回归和线性回归来评估其相关性。结果:分析的32,280例患者中,7.94%于1月份入院。1月份的选择性住院率(61.06%比53.51%)和手术干预率(74.80%比72.92%)明显高于其他月份。两组间住院死亡率、SAEs、ftr和LOS无显著差异。多变量分析显示1月份入院与SAE无显著相关性(AOR 1.06;95% CI 0.97-1.16),住院病人死亡率(AOR 1.09;95% ci 0.83-1.43), FTR (aor 1.04;95% CI 0.78-1.38), LOS (β 0.12;95% ci -0.05-0.29)。结论:研究结果没有证据表明EGS患者的1月效应,表明这种效应不是普遍适用的,需要根据具体情况进行评估,以了解住院患者整体健康结局的时间趋势。
期刊介绍:
World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.