Development and classification accuracy of an automated cognitive screening tool combining working memory and connected speech tasks for early detection of cognitive impairment in primary care
Robin C. Hilsabeck, Jeffrey N. Keller, Maya L. Henry, Junyi Jessy Li, Lokesh Pugalenthi, Paul Toprac, Patrick Chang, Joshua Chang, Suzanne Schmitz, Avery Largent, Heather Foil, Robert Brouillette, Rosemary A. Lester-Smith, Paul J. Rathouz
{"title":"Development and classification accuracy of an automated cognitive screening tool combining working memory and connected speech tasks for early detection of cognitive impairment in primary care","authors":"Robin C. Hilsabeck, Jeffrey N. Keller, Maya L. Henry, Junyi Jessy Li, Lokesh Pugalenthi, Paul Toprac, Patrick Chang, Joshua Chang, Suzanne Schmitz, Avery Largent, Heather Foil, Robert Brouillette, Rosemary A. Lester-Smith, Paul J. Rathouz","doi":"10.1002/trc2.70145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>Cognitive screening to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in primary care settings has proven to be a challenging task. The ideal solution would be a brief, yet sensitive, tool appropriate for use with individuals from diverse educational and cultural backgrounds that requires limited time and expertise from clinic staff. The purpose of this project was (1) to develop an automated cognitive screening tool incorporating cognitive and speech/language data using machine learning techniques for potential use in primary care settings and (2) to compare its classification accuracy to an established cognitive screening measure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>Participants were 53 cognitively normal and 51 cognitively impaired older adults. Each completed a working memory (WM) and four speaking tasks, followed by a second administration of WM to investigate the added utility of practice effects. Bayesian additive regression trees were used to test nine models, and the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment screen was administered as a comparator.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>The top feature set consisted of both administrations of the WM task and a personal narrative task and achieved a cross-validated classification accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve) of 0.84, which was slightly better than the comparator.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>Combining WM and acoustic and linguistic variables derived from connected speaking tasks discriminated cognitively normal from cognitively impaired groups with a high degree of accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Working memory and speaking tasks were used for detection of cognitive impairment.</li>\n \n <li>This combination distinguished cognitively normal from impaired older adults.</li>\n \n <li>This automated tool may overcome barriers to cognitive screening in primary care.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.70145","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.70145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Cognitive screening to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in primary care settings has proven to be a challenging task. The ideal solution would be a brief, yet sensitive, tool appropriate for use with individuals from diverse educational and cultural backgrounds that requires limited time and expertise from clinic staff. The purpose of this project was (1) to develop an automated cognitive screening tool incorporating cognitive and speech/language data using machine learning techniques for potential use in primary care settings and (2) to compare its classification accuracy to an established cognitive screening measure.
METHODS
Participants were 53 cognitively normal and 51 cognitively impaired older adults. Each completed a working memory (WM) and four speaking tasks, followed by a second administration of WM to investigate the added utility of practice effects. Bayesian additive regression trees were used to test nine models, and the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment screen was administered as a comparator.
RESULTS
The top feature set consisted of both administrations of the WM task and a personal narrative task and achieved a cross-validated classification accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve) of 0.84, which was slightly better than the comparator.
DISCUSSION
Combining WM and acoustic and linguistic variables derived from connected speaking tasks discriminated cognitively normal from cognitively impaired groups with a high degree of accuracy.
Highlights
Working memory and speaking tasks were used for detection of cognitive impairment.
This combination distinguished cognitively normal from impaired older adults.
This automated tool may overcome barriers to cognitive screening in primary care.
期刊介绍:
Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (TRCI) is a peer-reviewed, open access,journal from the Alzheimer''s Association®. The journal seeks to bridge the full scope of explorations between basic research on drug discovery and clinical studies, validating putative therapies for aging-related chronic brain conditions that affect cognition, motor functions, and other behavioral or clinical symptoms associated with all forms dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish findings from diverse domains of research and disciplines to accelerate the conversion of abstract facts into practical knowledge: specifically, to translate what is learned at the bench into bedside applications. The journal seeks to publish articles that go beyond a singular emphasis on either basic drug discovery research or clinical research. Rather, an important theme of articles will be the linkages between and among the various discrete steps in the complex continuum of therapy development. For rapid communication among a multidisciplinary research audience involving the range of therapeutic interventions, TRCI will consider only original contributions that include feature length research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, brief reports, narrative reviews, commentaries, letters, perspectives, and research news that would advance wide range of interventions to ameliorate symptoms or alter the progression of chronic neurocognitive disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish on topics related to medicine, geriatrics, neuroscience, neurophysiology, neurology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, bioinformatics, pharmaco-genetics, regulatory issues, health economics, pharmacoeconomics, and public health policy as these apply to preclinical and clinical research on therapeutics.