Immunotherapy in older adults with gynecologic cancers: rethinking age as a limiting factor.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-19 DOI:10.1080/14656566.2025.2548887
Yoshio Yoshida, Makoto Orisaka, Daisuke Inoue, Hiromasa Sasaki
{"title":"Immunotherapy in older adults with gynecologic cancers: rethinking age as a limiting factor.","authors":"Yoshio Yoshida, Makoto Orisaka, Daisuke Inoue, Hiromasa Sasaki","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2025.2548887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As the global population ages, understanding immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy and safety in the older cancer patients is critical. ICIs represent a major advance, but their effectiveness relative to age-related immune changes warrants investigation.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review synthesizes current clinical and preclinical evidence examining how aging influences ICIs response. We discuss age-related immunological changes (immunosenescence), alterations in the tumor microenvironment, mechanistic insights from preclinical aging models, and clinical trial/real-world data on ICIs efficacy and safety including immune-related adverse events (irAEs) across various cancers in older patient, referencing meta-analyses and specific trial outcomes.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Extensive clinical data suggest ICIs often provide significant survival benefits and are generally well-tolerated in appropriately selected older patients, with outcomes frequently comparable to younger cohorts, although efficacy can vary by tumor type, performance status (PS), and biomarkers. While irAEs require careful management considering comorbidities and frailty, overall incidence is not consistently higher in older adults. Treatment decisions should be individualized, integrating biological age indicators, PS, and comorbidities, rather than relying solely on chronological age. Future research should focus on identifying robust biomarkers and tailored strategies to optimize ICIs use in this demographic.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1311-1320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2025.2548887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: As the global population ages, understanding immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy and safety in the older cancer patients is critical. ICIs represent a major advance, but their effectiveness relative to age-related immune changes warrants investigation.

Areas covered: This review synthesizes current clinical and preclinical evidence examining how aging influences ICIs response. We discuss age-related immunological changes (immunosenescence), alterations in the tumor microenvironment, mechanistic insights from preclinical aging models, and clinical trial/real-world data on ICIs efficacy and safety including immune-related adverse events (irAEs) across various cancers in older patient, referencing meta-analyses and specific trial outcomes.

Expert opinion: Extensive clinical data suggest ICIs often provide significant survival benefits and are generally well-tolerated in appropriately selected older patients, with outcomes frequently comparable to younger cohorts, although efficacy can vary by tumor type, performance status (PS), and biomarkers. While irAEs require careful management considering comorbidities and frailty, overall incidence is not consistently higher in older adults. Treatment decisions should be individualized, integrating biological age indicators, PS, and comorbidities, rather than relying solely on chronological age. Future research should focus on identifying robust biomarkers and tailored strategies to optimize ICIs use in this demographic.

老年妇科癌症患者的免疫治疗:重新考虑年龄是一个限制因素。
导读:随着全球人口老龄化,了解免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)在老年癌症患者中的疗效和安全性至关重要。ICIs是一项重大进展,但其相对于年龄相关免疫变化的有效性值得调查。涵盖领域:本综述综合了当前的临床和临床前证据,研究了衰老如何影响ICIs的反应。我们讨论了年龄相关的免疫变化(免疫衰老),肿瘤微环境的改变,临床前衰老模型的机制见解,以及临床试验/真实世界的数据,包括老年患者各种癌症的免疫相关不良事件(irAEs),并参考了荟萃分析和特定试验结果。专家意见:广泛的临床数据表明,ICIs通常提供显着的生存益处,并且在适当选择的老年患者中通常具有良好的耐受性,其结果通常与年轻队列相当,尽管疗效可能因肿瘤类型,表现状态(PS)和生物标志物而异。虽然考虑到合并症和虚弱,irae需要仔细管理,但老年人的总体发病率并不一贯较高。治疗决策应个性化,综合生物年龄指标、PS和合并症,而不是仅仅依赖实足年龄。未来的研究应侧重于确定强大的生物标志物和量身定制的策略,以优化这一人口统计学中的ICIs使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on newly approved/near to launch compounds mainly of chemical/synthetic origin, providing expert opinion on the likely impact of these new agents on existing pharmacotherapy of specific diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信